Preparing a quantum circuit that implements a given sparse state is an important building block that is necessary for many different quantum algorithms. In the context of fault-tolerant quantum computing, the so-called non-Clifford gates are much more expensive to perform than the Clifford ones. We hence provide an algorithm for synthesizing sparse quantum states with a special care for quantum resources. The circuit depth, ancilla count, and crucially non-Clifford count of the circuit produced by the algorithm are all linear in the sparsity when access to arbitrary-angled rotations is given. When compiled down to the standard Clifford+T gate set, several constructions can be given for increasingly better T-count and depth at the expense of a larger number of ancillae. The most optimised construction for T-count reaches
O(s+log2(1/ε)) T gates for error
ε. The constructions are broken into two parts, one that synthesises a generalized W-state, well studied in the literature; and the second which is a classical reversible circuit implementing a permutation that maps the basis states of the W-state to those of the target sparse quantum state. We reduce this problem to the diagonalization of a binary matrix, using a specific set of elementary matrix operations corresponding to the classical reversible gates. We then solve this problem using a new version of Gauss-Jordan elimination, that minimizes the circuit complexities including circuit depth using parallel elimination steps. When the circuit is applied in one direction, we notice that all occurrences of (the expensive) Toffoli gates can all be replaced by adaptive Clifford circuits, leading to a better non-Clifford count.
Quantum state preparation is an important subroutine for quantum computing. We show that any n-qubit quantum state can be prepared with a Θ(n)-depth circuit using only single- and two-qubit gates, although with a cost of an exponential amount of ancillary qubits. On the other hand, for sparse quantum states with d⩾2 nonzero entries, we can reduce the circuit depth to Θ(log(nd)) with O(ndlogd) ancillary qubits. The algorithm for sparse states is exponentially faster than best-known results and the number of ancillary qubits is nearly optimal and only increases polynomially with the system size. We discuss applications of the results in different quantum computing tasks, such as Hamiltonian simulation, solving linear systems of equations, and realizing quantum random access memories, and find cases with exponential reductions of the circuit depth for all these three tasks. In particular, using our algorithm, we find a family of linear system solving problems enjoying exponential speedups, even compared to the best-known quantum and classical dequantization algorithms.
The preparation of quantum states is one of the most fundamental tasks in quantum computing, and a key primitive in many quantum algorithms. Of particular interest to areas such as quantum simulation and linear-system solvers are sparse quantum states, which contain only a small number
s of non-zero computational basis states compared to a generic state. In this work, we present an approach that prepares
s-sparse states on
n qubits, reducing the number of Toffoli gates required compared to prior art. We work in the established framework of first preparing a dense state on a
⌈log(s)⌉-qubit sub-register, and then mapping this state to the target state via an isometry, with the latter step dominating the cost of the full algorithm. The speed-up is achieved by designing an efficient algorithm for finding and implementing the isometry. The worst-case Toffoli cost of our isometry circuit, which may be viewed as a batched version of an approach by Malvetti et al., is essentially
2s for sufficiently large values of
n, yielding roughly a
log(s)/2 improvement factor over the state-of-the-art. In numerical benchmarks on randomly chosen states, the cost is closer to
s. With the improved isometry circuit, we examine the dense-state preparation step and present ways to optimize the joint cost of both steps, particularly in the case of target states with purely real coefficients, by outsourcing some sub-tasks from the dense-state preparation to the isometry.
State preparation is a fundamental routine in quantum computation, for which many algorithms have been proposed. Among them, perhaps the simplest one is the Grover-Rudolph algorithm. In this paper we analyze the performance of this algorithm when the state to prepare is sparse. We show that the gate complexity is linear in the number of nonzero amplitudes in the state and quadratic in the number of qubits. We then introduce a simple modification of the algorithm, which makes the dependence on the number of qubits also linear. This is competitive with the best known algorithms for sparse state preparation.
In quantum computing, state preparation is the problem of synthesizing circuits that initialize quantum systems to specific states. It has been shown that there are states that require circuits of exponential size to be prepared (when not using measurements), and consequently, despite extensive research on this problem, the existing computer-aided design (CAD) methods produce circuits of exponential size. In this paper, we show how CAD based state preparation can be made scalable by using techniques that are unique to quantum computing: measurements, and the resulting state collapses. With this approach, we are able to produce wide classes of states in polynomial time, resulting in an exponential improvement over existing CAD methods.
State preparation is a fundamental routine in quantum computation, for which many algorithms have been proposed. Among them, perhaps the simplest one is the Grover-Rudolph algorithm. In this paper, we analyse the performance of this algorithm when the state to prepare is sparse. We show that the gate complexity is linear in the number of non-zero amplitudes in the state and quadratic in the number of qubits. We then introduce a simple modification of the algorithm, which makes the dependence on the number of qubits also linear. This is competitive with the best known algorithms for sparse state preparation