Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

De Gruyter eBooks

Expansion of Physics through Nanoscience

Wolfram Schommers

Published Sep 18, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In contrast to other publications this work discusses Nanoscience strictly at the ultimate level where the properties of atomic matter emerge. The renowned author presents an interdisciplinary approach leading to the forefront of research of quantum-theoretical aspects of time, selforganizing nanoprocesses, brain functions, the matter-mind problem, behaviour research and philosophical questions.

DOI
10.1515/9783110525595

Related papers

Contextuality from Quantum Physics to Psychology

Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Jordan Scott, Ru Zhang +1 more

The book explores the variety of meanings of contextuality across different disciplines, with the emphasis on quantum physics and on psychology.

Advanced series on mathematical psychology•Sep 15, 2015•61 citations

Who or What Is Participating in Reality Formation? Beyond Mind, Matter, and Measurement

Yeshayahu Ben-Yehudah

Who or What Is Participating in Reality Formation? Beyond Mind, Matter, and Measurement Author: Yeshayahu Ben-Yehudah Affiliation: THE BEN-YEHUDAH INSTITUTE Original Publication Date: June 26, 2026 This interdisciplinary scientific and philosophical research paper examines the fundamental relationship between consciousness, observation, quantum measurement, and the formation of physical reality. Building upon the Ben-Yehudah Field Theory, the research investigates whether consciousness may function as an active participant in probabilistic state selection rather than merely emerging as a secondary product of biological processes. Central to this investigation is the Observer Problem in modern physics. Although quantum mechanics provides highly accurate mathematical descriptions of probabilistic physical systems, significant interpretive questions remain concerning measurement, observation, and the transition from quantum possibilities to definite observable outcomes. The research critically examines conventional frameworks of mind, matter, and measurement, questioning whether these approaches adequately explain the nature of the observer. It distinguishes physical measurement from conscious awareness and explores the possibility that the true observer is neither the biological brain, cognitive activity, nor the egoic self, but a deeper observing principle identified as the Subject or Witness. Within the proposed framework, consciousness is examined as a potentially fundamental aspect of existence rather than exclusively as an emergent property of matter. The brain and cognitive systems are considered possible biological interfaces or transducers through which consciousness participates in physical experience. The paper introduces a theoretical participatory sequence describing the proposed relationship between quantum possibility, observation, and manifested reality: Potential Field → Probabilistic States → Observation → State Selection → Manifest Reality This model proposes that reality formation may arise through interactions between consciousness and probabilistic physical systems rather than through purely material or purely subjective processes. The research further examines Cognitive Coherence, attentional stability, and observer alignment as proposed factors influencing the interaction between consciousness and probabilistic states. Within the Ben-Yehudah Field Theory, greater cognitive coherence is hypothesized to correspond with increased efficiency in conscious participation, although these relationships remain theoretical. Drawing upon the contributions of Niels Bohr, John Archibald Wheeler, Eugene Wigner, David Bohm, and contemporary consciousness researchers, the paper integrates quantum foundations, philosophy of mind, ontology, and consciousness studies to reconsider the relationship between the observer and observed reality. The investigation also explores the philosophical implications of distinguishing the experiencing self from the observing witness, suggesting that the nature of consciousness may require examination beyond thought, perception, memory, and individual identity. The proposed participatory model represents a theoretical and philosophical inquiry rather than an experimentally established mechanism of quantum state selection. Its central propositions require further empirical investigation and independent scientific evaluation. By examining the possible relationship between the Observer Problem and the fundamental nature of consciousness, this research advances a broader interdisciplinary inquiry into the architecture of reality and the role of conscious awareness within physical existence. Central Research Question: Who or what is participating in reality formation?

•Jun 26, 2026•0 citations

The Ben-Yehudah Framework on the Nature of Reality: Consciousness, Observation, and the Architecture of Existence

Yeshayahu Ben-Yehudah

The Ben-Yehudah Framework on the Nature of Reality: Consciousness, Observation, and the Architecture of Existence Author: Yeshayahu Ben-Yehudah Affiliation: THE BEN-YEHUDAH INSTITUTE Original Publication Date: June 25, 2026 This interdisciplinary scientific and philosophical research paper introduces the Ben-Yehudah Framework on the Nature of Reality, a theoretical model examining the foundational relationship between consciousness, observation, perception, and the underlying architecture of existence. The research challenges conventional philosophical materialism by proposing that consciousness is not merely an emergent byproduct of physical matter but may represent the primary field through which observable reality, information, energy, and material existence become possible. Drawing upon classical philosophy, modern philosophical inquiry, quantum physics, and contemporary consciousness studies, the paper examines the contributions of Plato, Aristotle, René Descartes, and Immanuel Kant to understanding reality, perception, causality, and the relationship between the observer and the observed. Central to the framework is the proposition that physical reality represents the measurable expression of deeper informational and energetic structures. The research introduces a proposed hierarchical architecture of existence: Source / Ultimate Reality → Consciousness → Information → Energy → Matter The paper further investigates the quantum measurement problem, the observer effect, and the unresolved question of whether consciousness plays a fundamental role in the manifestation of observable physical states. An additional component of the framework distinguishes ego-based perception from higher-order awareness. It examines how psychological conditioning, attachment, fragmented thinking, and identification with form may introduce distortions into human observation, while stillness, awareness, and disciplined observation may contribute to greater perceptual clarity. The research integrates ontology, epistemology, quantum foundations, philosophy of mind, and consciousness studies to establish an interdisciplinary foundation for further investigation into the relationship between consciousness and physical reality. The proposed framework is theoretical and philosophical in nature. Its central propositions concerning consciousness as a foundational field and its relationship to physical manifestation remain subjects for future empirical investigation rather than established scientific conclusions. At the center of this inquiry remains the fundamental question: Who—or what—is the observer behind the eyes?

•Jun 25, 2026•0 citations

Atoms

David Tong

The universe we live in is both strange and interesting. This strangeness comes about because, at the most fundamental level, the universe is governed by the laws of quantum mechanics. This is the most spectacularly accurate and powerful theory ever devised, one that has given us insights into many aspects of the world, from the structure of matter to the meaning of information. This textbook provides a comprehensive account of all things quantum. It starts by introducing the wavefunction and its interpretation as an ephemeral wave of complex probability, before delving into the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics and exploring its diverse applications, from atomic physics and scattering, to quantum computing. Designed to be accessible, this volume is suitable for both students and researchers, beginning with the basics before progressing to more advanced topics.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jun 19, 2025•0 citations

Why Physics Should Care about the Mind, and How to Think about it Without Worrying about the Mind-Body Problem

Jenann Ismael

Abstract Physics has a somewhat uneasy relationship to the mind. On the one hand, minds are part of the natural universe and although much of physics is concerned with the non-minded parts of reality, recently a set of problems has emerged in physics that has placed a special focus on observers. In quantum mechanics, the contrast between what the deterministic dynamics yields and what the observer sees is at the forefront of the theory’s difficulties. In the controversies surrounding time, questions about whether the relativistic image of time can account for the subjective experience of passage and flow have been central. In general, reconciling the manifest image of the world with the image presented by science requires at least some tacit understanding of how minds work. And because the evidence for our theories ultimately comes from experience, eventually we have to be able to bring the mind itself firmly under the scope of our physical theories. On the other hand, there is a set of philosophical controversies about the relationship between the mental and the physical that many people believe physics would do well to steer clear of. This chapter argues for a division between the aspects of the mind that physics must cope with and those that it can ignore. I argue the most difficult unresolved questions about the mind can be ignored without affecting progress in physics.

•Jul 18, 2022•0 citations

‘Advance’ quantum mechanics

John Swanson

To the true physicist, there is surely no area of life that lies beyond the illumination of physical thinking.

Physics World•May 1, 2014•6 citations
In contrast to other publications this work discusses Nanoscience strictly at the ultimate level where the properties of atomic matter emerge. The renowned author presents an interdisciplinary approach leading to the forefront of research of quantum-theoretical aspects of time, selforganizing nanoprocesses, brain functions, the matter-mind problem, behaviour research and philosophical questions.
Who or What Is Participating in Reality Formation? Beyond Mind, Matter, and Measurement Author: Yeshayahu Ben-Yehudah Affiliation: THE BEN-YEHUDAH INSTITUTE Original Publication Date: June 26, 2026 This interdisciplinary scientific and philosophical research paper examines the fundamental relationship between consciousness, observation, quantum measurement, and the formation of physical reality. Building upon the Ben-Yehudah Field Theory, the research investigates whether consciousness may function as an active participant in probabilistic state selection rather than merely emerging as a secondary product of biological processes. Central to this investigation is the Observer Problem in modern physics. Although quantum mechanics provides highly accurate mathematical descriptions of probabilistic physical systems, significant interpretive questions remain concerning measurement, observation, and the transition from quantum possibilities to definite observable outcomes. The research critically examines conventional frameworks of mind, matter, and measurement, questioning whether these approaches adequately explain the nature of the observer. It distinguishes physical measurement from conscious awareness and explores the possibility that the true observer is neither the biological brain, cognitive activity, nor the egoic self, but a deeper observing principle identified as the Subject or Witness. Within the proposed framework, consciousness is examined as a potentially fundamental aspect of existence rather than exclusively as an emergent property of matter. The brain and cognitive systems are considered possible biological interfaces or transducers through which consciousness participates in physical experience. The paper introduces a theoretical participatory sequence describing the proposed relationship between quantum possibility, observation, and manifested reality: Potential Field → Probabilistic States → Observation → State Selection → Manifest Reality This model proposes that reality formation may arise through interactions between consciousness and probabilistic physical systems rather than through purely material or purely subjective processes. The research further examines Cognitive Coherence, attentional stability, and observer alignment as proposed factors influencing the interaction between consciousness and probabilistic states. Within the Ben-Yehudah Field Theory, greater cognitive coherence is hypothesized to correspond with increased efficiency in conscious participation, although these relationships remain theoretical. Drawing upon the contributions of Niels Bohr, John Archibald Wheeler, Eugene Wigner, David Bohm, and contemporary consciousness researchers, the paper integrates quantum foundations, philosophy of mind, ontology, and consciousness studies to reconsider the relationship between the observer and observed reality. The investigation also explores the philosophical implications of distinguishing the experiencing self from the observing witness, suggesting that the nature of consciousness may require examination beyond thought, perception, memory, and individual identity. The proposed participatory model represents a theoretical and philosophical inquiry rather than an experimentally established mechanism of quantum state selection. Its central propositions require further empirical investigation and independent scientific evaluation. By examining the possible relationship between the Observer Problem and the fundamental nature of consciousness, this research advances a broader interdisciplinary inquiry into the architecture of reality and the role of conscious awareness within physical existence. Central Research Question: Who or what is participating in reality formation?
The Ben-Yehudah Framework on the Nature of Reality: Consciousness, Observation, and the Architecture of Existence Author: Yeshayahu Ben-Yehudah Affiliation: THE BEN-YEHUDAH INSTITUTE Original Publication Date: June 25, 2026 This interdisciplinary scientific and philosophical research paper introduces the Ben-Yehudah Framework on the Nature of Reality, a theoretical model examining the foundational relationship between consciousness, observation, perception, and the underlying architecture of existence. The research challenges conventional philosophical materialism by proposing that consciousness is not merely an emergent byproduct of physical matter but may represent the primary field through which observable reality, information, energy, and material existence become possible. Drawing upon classical philosophy, modern philosophical inquiry, quantum physics, and contemporary consciousness studies, the paper examines the contributions of Plato, Aristotle, René Descartes, and Immanuel Kant to understanding reality, perception, causality, and the relationship between the observer and the observed. Central to the framework is the proposition that physical reality represents the measurable expression of deeper informational and energetic structures. The research introduces a proposed hierarchical architecture of existence: Source / Ultimate Reality → Consciousness → Information → Energy → Matter The paper further investigates the quantum measurement problem, the observer effect, and the unresolved question of whether consciousness plays a fundamental role in the manifestation of observable physical states. An additional component of the framework distinguishes ego-based perception from higher-order awareness. It examines how psychological conditioning, attachment, fragmented thinking, and identification with form may introduce distortions into human observation, while stillness, awareness, and disciplined observation may contribute to greater perceptual clarity. The research integrates ontology, epistemology, quantum foundations, philosophy of mind, and consciousness studies to establish an interdisciplinary foundation for further investigation into the relationship between consciousness and physical reality. The proposed framework is theoretical and philosophical in nature. Its central propositions concerning consciousness as a foundational field and its relationship to physical manifestation remain subjects for future empirical investigation rather than established scientific conclusions. At the center of this inquiry remains the fundamental question: Who—or what—is the observer behind the eyes?
The universe we live in is both strange and interesting. This strangeness comes about because, at the most fundamental level, the universe is governed by the laws of quantum mechanics. This is the most spectacularly accurate and powerful theory ever devised, one that has given us insights into many aspects of the world, from the structure of matter to the meaning of information. This textbook provides a comprehensive account of all things quantum. It starts by introducing the wavefunction and its interpretation as an ephemeral wave of complex probability, before delving into the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics and exploring its diverse applications, from atomic physics and scattering, to quantum computing. Designed to be accessible, this volume is suitable for both students and researchers, beginning with the basics before progressing to more advanced topics.
Abstract Physics has a somewhat uneasy relationship to the mind. On the one hand, minds are part of the natural universe and although much of physics is concerned with the non-minded parts of reality, recently a set of problems has emerged in physics that has placed a special focus on observers. In quantum mechanics, the contrast between what the deterministic dynamics yields and what the observer sees is at the forefront of the theory’s difficulties. In the controversies surrounding time, questions about whether the relativistic image of time can account for the subjective experience of passage and flow have been central. In general, reconciling the manifest image of the world with the image presented by science requires at least some tacit understanding of how minds work. And because the evidence for our theories ultimately comes from experience, eventually we have to be able to bring the mind itself firmly under the scope of our physical theories. On the other hand, there is a set of philosophical controversies about the relationship between the mental and the physical that many people believe physics would do well to steer clear of. This chapter argues for a division between the aspects of the mind that physics must cope with and those that it can ignore. I argue the most difficult unresolved questions about the mind can be ignored without affecting progress in physics.