Bohmian mechanics, developed by Bohm in 1952, provides an alternative interpretation to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics [1-3]. In the hydrodynamic formulation of quantum mechanics, the continuity equation and the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation (QHJE) are obtained by substituting the wave function expressed in terms of the real amplitude and the real action function into the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. Bohm’s analytical approach has been used to compute and interpret realvalued quantum trajectories from a precomputed wave function for a diverse range of physical processes [3-8]. In the synthetic approach, the quantum trajectory method has been developed as a computational tool to generate the wave function by evolving ensembles of real-valued quantum trajectories through the integration of the hydrodynamic equations on the fly [9]. Remarkable progress has been made in the use of T&F Cat # K11224, Chapter 18, Page 284, 15-9-2010 real-valued quantum trajectories for solving a wide range of quantum mechanical problems [10].
Bohmian mechanics, developed by Bohm in 1952, provides an alternative interpretation to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics [1-3]. In the hydrodynamic formulation of quantum mechanics, the continuity equation and the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation (QHJE) are obtained by substituting the wave function expressed in terms of the real amplitude and the real action function into the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. Bohm’s analytical approach has been used to compute and interpret realvalued quantum trajectories from a precomputed wave function for a diverse range of physical processes [3-8]. In the synthetic approach, the quantum trajectory method has been developed as a computational tool to generate the wave function by evolving ensembles of real-valued quantum trajectories through the integration of the hydrodynamic equations on the fly [9]. Remarkable progress has been made in the use of T&F Cat # K11224, Chapter 18, Page 284, 15-9-2010 real-valued quantum trajectories for solving a wide range of quantum mechanical problems [10].
Complex-extended Bohmian mechanics is investigated by analytically continuing the wave function in polar form into the complex plane. We derive the complex-extended version of the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation and the continuity equation in Bohmian mechanics. Complex-extended Bohmian mechanics recovers the standard real-valued Bohmian mechanics on the real axis. The trajectories on the real axis are in accord with the standard real-valued Bohmian trajectories. The trajectories launched away from the real axis never intersect the real axis, and they display symmetry with respect to the real axis. Trajectories display hyperbolic deflection around nodes of the wave function in the complex plane.
In a recent publication, Goldfarb et al. have proposed a new trajectory scheme to solve quantum problems: Bohmian mechanics with complex action BOMCA . According to these authors, their contribution represents “a novel formulation of Bohmian mechanics.” In our opinion, rather than a new formulation of Bohmian mechanics, the proposal of Goldfarb et al. consists of a novel quantum computational scheme, which is based on solving the complex trajectory equations resulting from an already known complex version of Bohmian dynamics. On the other hand, Goldfarb et al. also claimed that their numerical scheme describes “fully local complex quantum trajectories,” with the reward of a significantly higher degree of localization than in the conventional Bohmian mechanics by lowering the magnitude of the quantum potential. At least from a theoretical and interpretative point of view, we consider that it is very important to clarify what “fully local quantum trajectories” means. Bohmian mechanics is a nonlocal theory because standard quantum mechanics is a nonlocal theory. This nonlocality manifests via the presence of a quantum potential, and therefore the corresponding quantum trajectories will display features that reflect such nonlocality. Something similar should also occur for any trajectory-based approach that intends to be equivalent to standard quantum mechanics. In this Comment we would like to provide a general discussion on these two aspects arising from the work of Goldfarb et al., which can be of much interest to the Chemical Physics community. In particular, we would like to stress the special interest relying on how the term locality should be employed. The approach of Goldfarb et al. starts with the timedependent quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation. This equation was considered by Leacock and Padgett in 1983 within the context of the quantum transformation theory as a way to obtain bound-state energy levels of quantum systems with no need to calculate the corresponding eigenfunctions. According to Leacock and Padgett, the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation can be either stated as a postulate as done by these authors or derived from the Schrodinger equation through a simple connection formula. In the second case, the quantum action corresponds to the complex phase of the wave function when the latter is expressed as a pure complex exponential function. This relationship allows one to pass straightforwardly from the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi formalism to the standard one in terms of the time-dependent Schrodinger and vice versa . Although both the Ansatz and the formulation used by Leacock and Padgett are similar to those considered in the standard quantum WKB semiclassical approximation, as pointed out by these authors, their approach conceptually differs from the WKB one. Within Bohmian mechanics, energy eigenstates present an inconvenience: they give rise to zero velocity fields. Hence, when particles are described by this type of states, they will remain steady motionless . To overcome this problem, Floyd and Faraggi and Matone developed timeindependent quantum Hamilton-Jacobi-like formulations starting from real bipolar Ansatze, though they did not claim full equivalence with standard quantum mechanics regarding their predictions. Later, John proposed a timedependent complex quantum trajectory formalism based on the same connection formula mentioned by Leacock and Padgett to study the dynamics associated with some simple analytical cases, such as the harmonic oscillator or the step barrier. This “modified de Broglie–Bohm approach to quantum mechanics,” as termed by John, is formally equivalent to the BOMCA formulation of Goldfarb et al. Nevertheless, we would like to specify that, due to the fundamental theoretical nature of John’s contribution, a separate calculation of the wave function is required in order to obtain the corresponding trajectories John makes use of the “guiding wave” idea from Bohmian mechanics . Meanwhile, in the version of Goldfarb et al. the modified de Broglie–Bohm approach is formulated in terms of a closed set of equations in the spirit of quantum hydrodynamical formalisms , which avoids the calculation of the wave functions, thus providing a new, practical use to such an approach. Furthermore, within the approach of Goldfarb et al., the expression for the quantum force happens to be typically much smaller than in standard Bohmian mechanics. On the other hand, we would also like to note that a related formulation has also been used by Chou and Wyatt, though they developed a different, novel numerical scheme to tackle the problem of bound-energy levels and scattering in one dimension. When trying to understand the quantum-classical correspondence from the perspective of a WKB-like formulation of Bohmian mechanics WKB-BM , Sanz and co-workers reached the complex quantum HamiltonJacobi equation the same year as John, but independently. The WKB-BM formulation constitutes an excellent, compreTHE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 127, 197101 2007
Bohmian mechanics is an alternative formulation of quantum mechanics that incorporates the familiar and intuitive picture of particles moving along trajectories and yet predicts the same results as the more widely accepted Copenhagen interpretation. In recent years there has been renewed interest in this Bohmian view, in part for the novel approach that it suggests to certain problems, such as decay processes, both from a theoretical and computational stand point. In this thesis we focus on using the concepts introduced by the Bohmian framework as a practical computational tool. I evaluate a number of implementations of the Bohmian method, get a sense of their strengths and weaknesses and attempt to overcome some stability issues that arise. For problems in one-dimension (lD), accurate solutions of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation produce a wave function from which Bohmian trajectories can be computed by integrating along flux lines. For direct integration of the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equations, the main problems that arise are related to evauating the quantum potential (QP), especially in regions of low probability density. Sufficient accuracy is required to avoid unphysical trajectory crossings. A number of interpolation schemes were investigated, and smoothed splines with special treatment of edge effects gave the best results. For problems in 2D the alternating direction implicit (ADI) method was employed to produce the wave function. Ways of dealing with unphysical reflections from the boundaries of a finite size domain were studied. The use of cellular automata, especially the lattice-Boltzmann method (LBM) were also considered. Here Bohm trajectories would be propagated by following a small set of rules. The main problem identified is that, unless a scheme can be found in which the quantum potential is self-generating from an equation of continuity, the overhead of computing the QP at each time step, is prohibitive.
Bohmian mechanics as formulated originally in 1952, has been useful in the implementation of numerical methods applied to quantum mechanics. The scientific community though has had ever since a critical thought about it. Therefore, there are still points to be clarified and rectified. The two main problems are basically: Bohmian mechanics gives a privilege role to the position representation. Secondly, the current interpretation of Bohmian trajectories has been recently proven wrong. In this context, in Chapter 2, new complex Bohmian quantities are defined; so that they allow the capacity to formulate Bohmian mechanics in any arbitrary continuous representation, for instance, the momentum representation. This Chapter is fully based on two articles, regarding the proposed complex Bohmian formulation and its extension into momentum space. Chapter 3 deals with a redefinition and reinterpretation of the Bohmian trajectories from the handling of the continuity equation, this is done without any need of additional postulates or interpretations. Also, it is proved that Bohmian mechanics is actually more than a projective aspect of the Wigner function. As a third point, Chapter 4 presents a sytematic treatment of the hydrodynamic scheme of Bohmian mechanics. Then, a brief summary of the transport equations in Bohmian mechanics is done. Next, a unified hydrodynamic treatment is found for the Bohmian mechanics. This treatment is useful to sketch, a Bohmian treatment to efficiently find the steady value of the transmission integral. In Chapter 5 conclusions of this thesis are drawn.
Transcending its origin in the debate on the interpretation of quantum theory, the continuous deterministic trajectory has proved a potent tool in computational quantum mechanics (an excellent introduction to numerical trajectory techniques is provided by Wyatt’s text [1]). It is straightforward to develop a method to derive the timedependent Schrödinger equation from a single-valued continuum of spacetime trajectories, and supply a corresponding exact formula for the wavefunction [2].Anatural language for this theory of evolution is offered by the hydrodynamic analogy, in which wave mechanics corresponds to the Eulerian picture (as shown by Madelung [3]) and the trajectory theory to the Lagrangian picture. The Lagrangian model for the quantum fluid may be developed from a variational principle involving a specific interaction potential (the quantum internal potential energy), and the Euler-Lagrange equations imply a nonlinear partial differential equation to calculate the trajectories of the fluid particles as functions of their initial coordinates and the initial wavefunction. The latter supplies two sets of data to the particle model: the initial density (via the amplitude) and the initial velocity (via the phase). The time-dependent wavefunction is then computed via the standard map between the Lagrangian coordinates and the Eulerian fields.
This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the Bohmian formulation of quantummechanics. It starts with a historical review of the difficulties found by Louis de Broglie, David Bohm, and John S. Bell to convince the scientific community about the validity and utility of Bohmian mechanics. Then, a formal explanation of Bohmian mechanics for nonrelativistic, single-particle quantum systems is presented. The generalization to many-particle systems, where the exchange interaction and the spin play an important role, is also presented. After that, the measurement process in Bohmian mechanics is discussed. It is emphasized that Bohmian mechanics exactly reproduces the mean value and temporal and spatial correlations obtained from the standard, that is the Copenhagen or orthodox, formulation. The ontological characteristics of Bohmian mechanics provide a description of measurements as another type of interaction without the need for introducing the wave function collapse. Several solved problems are presented at the end of the chapter, giving additional mathematical support to some particular issues. A detailed description of computational algorithms to obtain Bohmian trajectories from the numerical solution of the Schro¨dinger or the Hamilton-Jacobi equations are presented in an appendix. The motivation of this chapter is twofold: first, as a didactic introduction to Bohmian formalism, which is used in the subsequent chapters, and second, as a self-contained summary for any newcomer interested in using Bohmian mechanics in his or her daily research activity.