Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Lesson of Quantum Theory

Jorrit de Boer, Erik Dal, Ole Ulfbeck

Published Jan 1, 1986• 61 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The quantum physics'lesson

Graziano Cavallini, Marco Giliberti

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Lessons From Quantum Mechanics

Daniel M. Hausman

Synthese•Nov 1, 1999•10 citations

Learning a quantum lesson

R. Michael Bokeno

Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal•Oct 5, 2010•0 citations

The correspondence principle in light of holographic correspondence and the law of large numbers

Blind Review

The main philosophical lesson of holographic gravity is that spatiotemporal descriptions of a field theory may not be respected by observational reality. We apply this lesson to the correspondence principle, and then later justify the lesson (holographic correspondence) without necessitating such spatiotemporal deviations via the law of large numbers in statistics, applied to an average of n quantum measurements. Classical observables are considered to emerge as n approaches infinity. The averaging approach can be interpreted both as a generalization of Bohr's correspondence principle (large number limit) and Planck's correspondence principle (Planck's constant approaching zero). Holographic correspondence and the averaging approach are then re-analyzed in light of preceding works in the correspondence principle. A key consequential lesson is that we should not conflate the nature of fundamental theory observables with that of emergent theory observables, and once this confusion is avoided, the correspondence principle has a solid standing.

•Sep 8, 2023•0 citations

Bohr's Epistemological Lesson of Quantum Physics

Hans Halvorson

I argue here that progress in understanding the lessons of quantum physics has been hindered by the tendency to cast Niels Bohr as a villain. Building on the work of Favrholdt, Faye, and Howard, I present a more accurate view of Bohr's proposal for the "epistemological lesson" of quantum physics. I then argue that several interpretive programs -- often presented as alternatives to Copenhagen -- are, after substantial conceptual work, arriving at a view that is notably similar to Bohr's. Using Maudlin’s formulation of the measurement problem as a foil, I argue that it relies on a notion of wave-function completeness that is inappropriate for a genuinely indeterministic theory, and one that Bohr consistently rejected. On Bohr's view, quantum theory permits concrete agents, situated within specific experimental contexts, to make objective descriptions, while refusing the demand for a single, context-free "description from nowhere".

•Dec 19, 2025•0 citations

On quantum theory

Berthold‐Georg Englert

arXiv:1308.5290•The European Physical Journal D•Nov 1, 2013•56 citations
The main philosophical lesson of holographic gravity is that spatiotemporal descriptions of a field theory may not be respected by observational reality. We apply this lesson to the correspondence principle, and then later justify the lesson (holographic correspondence) without necessitating such spatiotemporal deviations via the law of large numbers in statistics, applied to an average of n quantum measurements. Classical observables are considered to emerge as n approaches infinity. The averaging approach can be interpreted both as a generalization of Bohr's correspondence principle (large number limit) and Planck's correspondence principle (Planck's constant approaching zero). Holographic correspondence and the averaging approach are then re-analyzed in light of preceding works in the correspondence principle. A key consequential lesson is that we should not conflate the nature of fundamental theory observables with that of emergent theory observables, and once this confusion is avoided, the correspondence principle has a solid standing.
I argue here that progress in understanding the lessons of quantum physics has been hindered by the tendency to cast Niels Bohr as a villain. Building on the work of Favrholdt, Faye, and Howard, I present a more accurate view of Bohr's proposal for the "epistemological lesson" of quantum physics. I then argue that several interpretive programs -- often presented as alternatives to Copenhagen -- are, after substantial conceptual work, arriving at a view that is notably similar to Bohr's. Using Maudlin’s formulation of the measurement problem as a foil, I argue that it relies on a notion of wave-function completeness that is inappropriate for a genuinely indeterministic theory, and one that Bohr consistently rejected. On Bohr's view, quantum theory permits concrete agents, situated within specific experimental contexts, to make objective descriptions, while refusing the demand for a single, context-free "description from nowhere".