Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Optics

Interaction between sources and the superposition principle in interference phenomena

Reinaldo Welti

Published Oct 15, 2021• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract In the explanations of the double slit experiment it is usually assumed that the superposition of the diffracted waves by two separate slits (one open and another closed) is the same as superimposing the diffracted waves when both slits are open at the same time. This naïve use of the superposition principle is generally not valid in either classical electromagnetism or quantum mechanics. As we will see, the diffraction diagram of one of the slits is altered when the other is open and when the slits are closer, the interaction between them is greater. In this work we will analyse the interaction between different types of sources (antennas, loudspeakers and, of course, slits) and we will show how this interaction explains the apparent anomalies in energy conservation and also the recent results of Young’s interference that show that the total diffracted intensity is reduced or increased depending on the distance between the slits. We also make a brief comment on the contributions of our work to the supposed looped trajectories of energy in interference phenomena.

DOI
10.1088/2040-8986/ac2fd1

Related papers

Young's Double-slit Experiment, correction on the misconception.

Harsha Kumar Suriyaarachchi

In Young's Double Slit Experiment (YDE) and improved versions, waves causing interference travel different distances.As speed of light is constant, waves require different time spans to reach the point of interference.Thereby, if the waves are generated simultaneously at the slits/source, they cannot meet on the screen anywhere outside the mid-line.Formation of fringes is commonly interpreted as interference caused by the meeting (super-positioning) of two waves generated simultaneously.The reality is that fringes are formed by interference of waves generated at different times.However, unless impacted by other phenomena, two waves generated at different times converging to form fringes, as this paper shows, will mandatorily come in same phase to the interference point, producing constructive interference.Interference observed, however, is not only constructive.The effect on the phase of waves while bending (diffraction) is also to be considered.Consequently, it addresses three phenomena causing phase shifts: (1)different starting times,(2)bending at slits, and (3)distances traveled (In contrast, the first two are overlooked by the conventional approach).(Dirac and Feynman Path Integral methods on quantum particles have different approaches).The paper reveals the widespread misconception in the analysis of YDE and would impact the wave/particle and other YDE interpretations.

•Dec 5, 2023•0 citations

Nonclassical Paths in Quantum Interference Experiments

Rahul Sawant, Joseph Samuel, Aninda Sinha +2 more

In a double slit interference experiment, the wave function at the screen with both slits open is not exactly equal to the sum of the wave functions with the slits individually open one at a time. The three scenarios represent three different boundary conditions and as such, the superposition principle should not be applicable. However, most well-known text books in quantum mechanics implicitly and/or explicitly use this assumption that is only approximately true. In our present study, we have used the Feynman path integral formalism to quantify contributions from nonclassical paths in quantum interference experiments that provide a measurable deviation from a naive application of the superposition principle. A direct experimental demonstration for the existence of these nonclassical paths is difficult to present. We find that contributions from such paths can be significant and we propose simple three-slit interference experiments to directly confirm their existence.

arXiv:1308.2022•Physical Review Letters•Sep 19, 2014•94 citations

An analysis of Young’s double slit experiment in the light of Schrodinger’s cat

Abhijit Hazarika, L.K. Rajkhowa, Bibhas Kumar Dutta +3 more

Quantum interference is a challenging phenomenon in quantum optics. According to this principle of superposition of quantum mechanics, elementary particles such as photon can not only be in more than one place at a given time, but that an individual particle can cross its own trajectory and interfere with the direction of its path. Thomas Young devised the double slit experiment to prove that light consisted of waves. Analysis of the double slit experiment and the interference pattern indicates that each photon not only goes through both the slits simultaneously, but traverses every possible trajectory on the way to the target, not just in theory, but in fact. In the present work we have analysed the situation in terms of quantum superposition and Schrodinger cat states in quantum optics. The nature of photon in this analysis is examined

Archives of physics research•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Superposition of the diffraction fields of apertures: an experimental test

John Frederick Nye, Wei Ge Liang

In Kirchhoff diffraction theory it is assumed that the effects of separate apertures in a screen are superposable. Thus, for example, a two-slit pattern is the (complex) superposition of the two individual single-slit patterns. The validity of the assumption has been tested with 10 GHz microwaves (λ = 30 mm) incident at 45° on two parallel slits, of width ½λ, in a conducting screen, their spacing being λ. The diffraction pattern immediately behind the screen was measured by using the optically modulated scatterer technique. With the electric field in the incident wave parallel to the slits there was, on average, a 7 per cent discrepancy in amplitude from what would be predicted by superposition of the effects of the two separate apertures. With the electric field perpendicular to the slits the discrepancy increased to 25 per cent in amplitude. The results may be interpreted by saying that the two–slit pattern is indeed the result of interference between two separate single–slit patterns, but their phases and amplitudes are different from what would be expected from simple theory. It is as if the wave emitted from each slit is affected (by 10 or 30 per cent) by whether the other slit is open or closed. The difference between the results for the two polarizations is explained by the boundary condition on the surface of the screen, which tends to suppress communication between the slits when the polarization of the incident wave is parallel to the slits.

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Sep 8, 1997•3 citations

Light transmission through two slits: the Young experiment revisited

Reinaldo Welti

In the traditional analysis of Young interference it is supposed that the two slits radiate in the same way for any distance between them. In this work, the phenomenon of interference is studied within the framework of the classical electromagnetic theory and in a context that takes into account the mutual interactions between the slits. The results obtained are in agreement with recent experimental values showing how the total transmitted power is enhanced or reduced as a function of the distance between the two slits.

Journal of Optics A Pure and Applied Optics•May 26, 2006•12 citations

Interference and diffraction

P A Davidson

Abstract In Chapter 21, we turn to interference and diffraction. We start by describing the interference pattern in Young’s classic two-slit experiment, whose analysis is subsequently generalised to determine the interference pattern behind a multi-slit grating. The diffraction pattern for a single slit is then estimated using Huygens’ principle, and this is combined with the interference pattern for a multi-slit grating to get the entire wave pattern generated by a diffraction grating. Next, we turn to the diffraction of electrons. This starts with a brief introduction to quantum mechanics, focussed on Schrodinger’s wave equation, de Broglie waves, and the collapse of the wavefunction following measurements. Finally, we use these elementary quantum concepts to describe the diffraction of electrons.

•Dec 23, 2025•0 citations
Abstract In the explanations of the double slit experiment it is usually assumed that the superposition of the diffracted waves by two separate slits (one open and another closed) is the same as superimposing the diffracted waves when both slits are open at the same time. This naïve use of the superposition principle is generally not valid in either classical electromagnetism or quantum mechanics. As we will see, the diffraction diagram of one of the slits is altered when the other is open and when the slits are closer, the interaction between them is greater. In this work we will analyse the interaction between different types of sources (antennas, loudspeakers and, of course, slits) and we will show how this interaction explains the apparent anomalies in energy conservation and also the recent results of Young’s interference that show that the total diffracted intensity is reduced or increased depending on the distance between the slits. We also make a brief comment on the contributions of our work to the supposed looped trajectories of energy in interference phenomena.
In Young's Double Slit Experiment (YDE) and improved versions, waves causing interference travel different distances.As speed of light is constant, waves require different time spans to reach the point of interference.Thereby, if the waves are generated simultaneously at the slits/source, they cannot meet on the screen anywhere outside the mid-line.Formation of fringes is commonly interpreted as interference caused by the meeting (super-positioning) of two waves generated simultaneously.The reality is that fringes are formed by interference of waves generated at different times.However, unless impacted by other phenomena, two waves generated at different times converging to form fringes, as this paper shows, will mandatorily come in same phase to the interference point, producing constructive interference.Interference observed, however, is not only constructive.The effect on the phase of waves while bending (diffraction) is also to be considered.Consequently, it addresses three phenomena causing phase shifts: (1)different starting times,(2)bending at slits, and (3)distances traveled (In contrast, the first two are overlooked by the conventional approach).(Dirac and Feynman Path Integral methods on quantum particles have different approaches).The paper reveals the widespread misconception in the analysis of YDE and would impact the wave/particle and other YDE interpretations.
In a double slit interference experiment, the wave function at the screen with both slits open is not exactly equal to the sum of the wave functions with the slits individually open one at a time. The three scenarios represent three different boundary conditions and as such, the superposition principle should not be applicable. However, most well-known text books in quantum mechanics implicitly and/or explicitly use this assumption that is only approximately true. In our present study, we have used the Feynman path integral formalism to quantify contributions from nonclassical paths in quantum interference experiments that provide a measurable deviation from a naive application of the superposition principle. A direct experimental demonstration for the existence of these nonclassical paths is difficult to present. We find that contributions from such paths can be significant and we propose simple three-slit interference experiments to directly confirm their existence.
Quantum interference is a challenging phenomenon in quantum optics. According to this principle of superposition of quantum mechanics, elementary particles such as photon can not only be in more than one place at a given time, but that an individual particle can cross its own trajectory and interfere with the direction of its path. Thomas Young devised the double slit experiment to prove that light consisted of waves. Analysis of the double slit experiment and the interference pattern indicates that each photon not only goes through both the slits simultaneously, but traverses every possible trajectory on the way to the target, not just in theory, but in fact. In the present work we have analysed the situation in terms of quantum superposition and Schrodinger cat states in quantum optics. The nature of photon in this analysis is examined
In Kirchhoff diffraction theory it is assumed that the effects of separate apertures in a screen are superposable. Thus, for example, a two-slit pattern is the (complex) superposition of the two individual single-slit patterns. The validity of the assumption has been tested with 10 GHz microwaves (λ = 30 mm) incident at 45° on two parallel slits, of width ½λ, in a conducting screen, their spacing being λ. The diffraction pattern immediately behind the screen was measured by using the optically modulated scatterer technique. With the electric field in the incident wave parallel to the slits there was, on average, a 7 per cent discrepancy in amplitude from what would be predicted by superposition of the effects of the two separate apertures. With the electric field perpendicular to the slits the discrepancy increased to 25 per cent in amplitude. The results may be interpreted by saying that the two–slit pattern is indeed the result of interference between two separate single–slit patterns, but their phases and amplitudes are different from what would be expected from simple theory. It is as if the wave emitted from each slit is affected (by 10 or 30 per cent) by whether the other slit is open or closed. The difference between the results for the two polarizations is explained by the boundary condition on the surface of the screen, which tends to suppress communication between the slits when the polarization of the incident wave is parallel to the slits.
In the traditional analysis of Young interference it is supposed that the two slits radiate in the same way for any distance between them. In this work, the phenomenon of interference is studied within the framework of the classical electromagnetic theory and in a context that takes into account the mutual interactions between the slits. The results obtained are in agreement with recent experimental values showing how the total transmitted power is enhanced or reduced as a function of the distance between the two slits.
Abstract In Chapter 21, we turn to interference and diffraction. We start by describing the interference pattern in Young’s classic two-slit experiment, whose analysis is subsequently generalised to determine the interference pattern behind a multi-slit grating. The diffraction pattern for a single slit is then estimated using Huygens’ principle, and this is combined with the interference pattern for a multi-slit grating to get the entire wave pattern generated by a diffraction grating. Next, we turn to the diffraction of electrons. This starts with a brief introduction to quantum mechanics, focussed on Schrodinger’s wave equation, de Broglie waves, and the collapse of the wavefunction following measurements. Finally, we use these elementary quantum concepts to describe the diffraction of electrons.