The Effect of Measurement on Quantum Optical Systems (With 2 Figures)

Gerard J Milburn

Robert B. A. Adamson, Lynden K. Shalm, Aephraim M. Steinberg

Nonclassical joint measurements can hugely improve the efficiency with which certain figures of merit of quantum systems are measured. We use such a measurement to determine a particular figure of merit, the purity, for a polarization qubit. In the process we highlight some of subtleties involved in common methods for generating decoherence in quantum optics.

Miguel Orszag, R. Ramírez

Pieter Kok, Brendon W. Lovett

Before we begin our detailed discussion of optical quantum information processing, we need to introduce certain figures of merit that quantify how well our information processor is performing. For a quantum computer, the time and resources it takes to complete a task are good measures, but we are faced with the problem that we do not know what the final design for a quantum computer will be. We therefore need additional figures of merit that are applicable in a wide range of situations. We first introduce the concept of the ‘density operator’, which will be used to describe quantum states about which we have incomplete knowledge. We then define the ‘fidelity’, which is used for assessing how close we are to a particular desired quantum state, and we discuss different measures of entanglement. The later part of the chapter will focus on figures of merit that are particularly relevant for assessing optical states, namely the first-order correlation functions, and the visibility of interference phenomena. Density operators and superoperators Classical physics often confronts us with situations where we can say only a limited amount about the state of a system: we can measure certain ‘bulk’ variables such as the temperature and pressure, but we do not know all of the details of the microscopic make-up of the state. For example, we typically have very little knowledge of the positions and velocities of all the atoms that constitute the system.

Stig Stenholm

Morgan W. Mitchell, Marco Koschorreck, Marcin Kubasik +2 more

An extensive debate on quantum non-demolition (QND) measurement, reviewed in Grangier et al (1998 Nature 396 537), finds that true QND measurements must have both non-classical state-preparation capability and non-classical information-damage tradeoff. Existing figures of merit for these non-classicality criteria require direct measurement of the signal variable and are thus difficult to apply to optically-probed material systems. Here we describe a method to demonstrate both criteria without need for to direct signal measurements. Using a covariance matrix formalism and a general noise model, we compute meter observables for QND measurement triples, which suffice to compute all QND figures of merit. The result will allow certified QND measurement of atomic spin ensembles using existing techniques.