Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Axiomathes

A Logical Encounter of the Schrödinger’s Cat Paradox

R Azhagu Raj

Published Aug 26, 2021• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10516-021-09592-1

Related papers

The Paradox of Schrödinger’s Cat

Amit Goswami

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•1 citation

A Note On Schrödinger's Cat and the Unexpected Hanging Paradox

J.M. Holtzman

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Sep 1, 1988•3 citations

A Neutrosophic Logic View to Schrodinger's Cat Paradox

Florentín Smarandache, Victor Christianto

This article discusses Neutrosophic Logic interpretation of the Schrodinger’s cat paradox. We argue that this paradox involves some degree of indeterminacy (unknown) which Neutrosophic Logic could take into consideration, whereas other methods including Fuzzy Logic could not. For a balanced discussion, other interpretations have also been discussed.

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Oct 17, 2008•1 citation

Three perspectives on Schrödinger’s cat

John G. Loeser

The resolutions to the paradox of Schrödinger’s cat engendered by three major perspectives on quantum mechanics—quantum logic, the many worlds interpretation, and the Copenhagen interpretation—are discussed. The core of each perspective is revealed in the process. Each resolution to Schrödinger’s cat has a counterpart which solves the logical paradox known as the unexpected hanging. The rather striking parallels serve to emphasize several points. First, the quantum paradox is an epistemological and not a physical one. Second, the three interpretations mentioned, unlike some others, are faithful to this understanding. And third, the pitfalls in these two paradoxes have a somewhat universal character.

American Journal of Physics•Dec 1, 1984•5 citations

The Fate of Schrodinger’s Cat

Problem solving in mathematics and beyond•Jul 21, 2020•0 citations

The Soliloquy of Schrödinger’s Cat

Pippa Storey

Scientific American•Jun 18, 2026•0 citations
The resolutions to the paradox of Schrödinger’s cat engendered by three major perspectives on quantum mechanics—quantum logic, the many worlds interpretation, and the Copenhagen interpretation—are discussed. The core of each perspective is revealed in the process. Each resolution to Schrödinger’s cat has a counterpart which solves the logical paradox known as the unexpected hanging. The rather striking parallels serve to emphasize several points. First, the quantum paradox is an epistemological and not a physical one. Second, the three interpretations mentioned, unlike some others, are faithful to this understanding. And third, the pitfalls in these two paradoxes have a somewhat universal character.