Classical cryptography has been around for a long time in the documented human history, but most classical ciphers were broken and even solved by hand. Shannon introduced the notion of perfect secrecy that formally defines confidentiality in the information-theoretic sense, which is only possible in the restricted scenarios where the message is no longer than the encryption key. The invention of public-key cryptography (the Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocol in 1976 and the RSA crypto-system in 1977) marks the birth of modern cryptography, allowing parties to exchange messages securely without sharing any secrets in advance. Furthermore, it provides computational security based on the conjectured hardness of mathematical problems such as factorization and the discrete logarithm. Public-key cryptography has found numerous applications in the Internet, financial and banking industry, and blockchains, and it plays a crucial role in protecting information security and asset safety. Unfortunately, in the 1990s, Shor proposed efficient quantum algorithms that solve number-theoretic problems, including factorization and discrete logarithms in polynomial time. Once a quantum computer of a particular scale becomes a reality, it will cause a devastating blow to the existing public-key infrastructure. To deal with such a ‘quantum crisis’, academia and industry are looking into the design, analysis and standardization of cryptographic algorithms that can resist quantum computers referred to as post-quantum cryptography (PQC). The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been soliciting proposals for the post-quantum public-key algorithms since 2016. More recently, the Chinese Association for Cryptologic Research (CACR) held a competition on designing cryptographic algorithms whose public-key cryptography track focused on post-quantum cryptographic algorithms. Lattice-based cryptography is considered by most to be the mainstream technical route of post-quantum cryptography, which is reflected in the number of proposals (and their percentage of the total) received in the NIST PQC process. To reflect the status quo of post-quantum cryptography, we invite leading experts in this area to contribute three technical perspectives that aim to help readers understand the algorithms, the underlying basic techniques and different technical routes to achieve quantum resistance. The first perspective, presented by Lu and Zhang, introduces public-key cryptographic algorithms whose quantum security is reducible from the conjectured quantum hardness of lattice problems. In particular, they mainly focus on public-key encryption (PKE) and the key encapsulation mechanism (KEM), which are essential building blocks for securing the confidentiality of communication without pre-shared secrets. Both types of crypto-systems are solicited by the NIST PQC standardization and the CACR algorithm design competition. This perspective gives a comprehensive survey on practical lattice-based PKEs/KEMs, and their best-known quantum and classical attacks. Another important post-quantum crypto-system is digital signature, which ensures that three goals of information security are met other than confidentiality, namely, integrity, authentication and non-repudiation. The second perspective is on lattice-based signature by Lyubashevsky. In this perspective, he surveys different techniques in building lattice-based post-quantum crypto-systems, discusses the challenges in overcoming performance issues and gives us state-of-the-art digital signature schemes. In addition to ensuring the ‘static’ security of information in storage and transmission, advanced cryptographic algorithms and protocols can guarantee information security during the computation process (possibly among multiple parties), referred to as privacy-preserving computation. Cryptographic techniques involved in privacy-preserving computation include secure multi-party computation, zero-knowledge proof and fully homomorphic encryption. There is a pressing need to migrate them to the post-quantum era. The third perspective, by Yu and Xie, presents practical instantiations of these algorithms and discusses possible ways to migrate them to their quantum-resistant counterparts. To summarize, post-quantum cryptography has received widespread attention and made significant progress in recent years. Some post-quantum cryptographic algorithms, such as the lattice-based candidate, also have other advantages (e.g., computational efficiency and full homomorphism) over their classical counterparts. Lattice-based cryptography is an emerging field with high theoretical value and wide application, and we encourage young researchers to enter and explore this new and exciting field.
Classical cryptography has been around for a long time in the documented human history, but most classical ciphers were broken and even solved by hand. Shannon introduced the notion of perfect secrecy that formally defines confidentiality in the information-theoretic sense, which is only possible in the restricted scenarios where the message is no longer than the encryption key. The invention of public-key cryptography (the Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocol in 1976 and the RSA crypto-system in 1977) marks the birth of modern cryptography, allowing parties to exchange messages securely without sharing any secrets in advance. Furthermore, it provides computational security based on the conjectured hardness of mathematical problems such as factorization and the discrete logarithm. Public-key cryptography has found numerous applications in the Internet, financial and banking industry, and blockchains, and it plays a crucial role in protecting information security and asset safety. Unfortunately, in the 1990s, Shor proposed efficient quantum algorithms that solve number-theoretic problems, including factorization and discrete logarithms in polynomial time. Once a quantum computer of a particular scale becomes a reality, it will cause a devastating blow to the existing public-key infrastructure. To deal with such a ‘quantum crisis’, academia and industry are looking into the design, analysis and standardization of cryptographic algorithms that can resist quantum computers referred to as post-quantum cryptography (PQC). The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been soliciting proposals for the post-quantum public-key algorithms since 2016. More recently, the Chinese Association for Cryptologic Research (CACR) held a competition on designing cryptographic algorithms whose public-key cryptography track focused on post-quantum cryptographic algorithms. Lattice-based cryptography is considered by most to be the mainstream technical route of post-quantum cryptography, which is reflected in the number of proposals (and their percentage of the total) received in the NIST PQC process. To reflect the status quo of post-quantum cryptography, we invite leading experts in this area to contribute three technical perspectives that aim to help readers understand the algorithms, the underlying basic techniques and different technical routes to achieve quantum resistance. The first perspective, presented by Lu and Zhang, introduces public-key cryptographic algorithms whose quantum security is reducible from the conjectured quantum hardness of lattice problems. In particular, they mainly focus on public-key encryption (PKE) and the key encapsulation mechanism (KEM), which are essential building blocks for securing the confidentiality of communication without pre-shared secrets. Both types of crypto-systems are solicited by the NIST PQC standardization and the CACR algorithm design competition. This perspective gives a comprehensive survey on practical lattice-based PKEs/KEMs, and their best-known quantum and classical attacks. Another important post-quantum crypto-system is digital signature, which ensures that three goals of information security are met other than confidentiality, namely, integrity, authentication and non-repudiation. The second perspective is on lattice-based signature by Lyubashevsky. In this perspective, he surveys different techniques in building lattice-based post-quantum crypto-systems, discusses the challenges in overcoming performance issues and gives us state-of-the-art digital signature schemes. In addition to ensuring the ‘static’ security of information in storage and transmission, advanced cryptographic algorithms and protocols can guarantee information security during the computation process (possibly among multiple parties), referred to as privacy-preserving computation. Cryptographic techniques involved in privacy-preserving computation include secure multi-party computation, zero-knowledge proof and fully homomorphic encryption. There is a pressing need to migrate them to the post-quantum era. The third perspective, by Yu and Xie, presents practical instantiations of these algorithms and discusses possible ways to migrate them to their quantum-resistant counterparts. To summarize, post-quantum cryptography has received widespread attention and made significant progress in recent years. Some post-quantum cryptographic algorithms, such as the lattice-based candidate, also have other advantages (e.g., computational efficiency and full homomorphism) over their classical counterparts. Lattice-based cryptography is an emerging field with high theoretical value and wide application, and we encourage young researchers to enter and explore this new and exciting field.
The invention of public-key cryptography (PKC) by Diffie and Hellman in 1976 is one of two milestones marking the beginning of modern cryptography. The security of a PKC system requires that it should be infeasible to compute the private key from a given public key, which in turn is typically guaranteed by the difficulty in solving some cryptographic-friendly mathematical problems. Among those problems, the integer factorization and discrete logarithm problems play pivotal roles in the development of public-key cryptography. In particular, the assumption that there is no polynomial time (classical) algorithm that solves the above two problems constitutes the basis for the security of almost all currently used public-key cryptosystems, such as RSA and ElGamal. However, Shor [1] found an efficient quantum solving algorithm for the integer factorization and discrete logarithm problems in 1994, which would destroy the security basis for most real deployed PKC systems if large-scale quantum computers become available. The rapid development of quantum technology in recent years suggests that we are getting closer to the quantum crisis of current PKC systems. As a response to the quantum crisis, the research community has made many efforts to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) that are believed to resist quantum computer attacks. Lattice-based cryptography is one of the main directions in this area, and has become the most promising PQC candidate for standardization. The research of lattice-based cryptography dates back to the seminal work of Ajtai [2], which first based the security of cryptographic primitives on the difficulty of solving some lattice problems such as the approximate shortest vector problem and the closest vector problem. After more than two decades of development, lattice-based cryptography has gained substantial progress. In theory, we have witnessed the construction of many powerful cryptographic primitives that were not known before. In practice, the public key size of lattice-based cryptosystems has been significantly reduced from several gigabytes to a few kilobytes. For current applications and standardization, key exchanges, public-key encryptions (PKEs) and signatures are the most desired lattice-based cryptosystems, where the first two are often used to ensure information secrecy, while the last provides information authentication. Note that public-key encryptions are equivalent to two-round key exchanges, also known as the key encapsulation mechanism (KEM). In the following, we focus on lattice-based PKEs/KEMs. The design principle of lattice-based PKEs/KEMs follows two approaches: a trapdoor one-way function and an approximate commutative one-way function. In the first approach, a trapdoor one-way function f and its trapdoor f−1 are generated as the public key and private key. A plaintext m is encrypted as c = f(m), and the ciphertext is decrypted as m = f−1(c). The NTRU scheme and its variants follow such an approach. In the second approach, an approximate commutative function fs and a random input a are generated, the public key is (a, b = fs(a)) and the private key is s. A plaintext m is encrypted as c1 = gr(a), c2 = gr(b) + E(m), where r is a random element, g is an approximate commutative one-way function and E is the encoding of an error-correction code. The ciphertext (c1, c2) is decrypted as m = D(c2 − fs(c1)), where D is the decoding of an error-correction code. The correctness of decryption is guaranteed by the approximate commutative property (gr(b) = gr(fs(a)) ≈ fs(gr(a)) = fs(c1)) and the error-correction code. Learning with errors (LWE) problem-based PKE/KEM schemes and their variants follow such an approach. The standardization of PQC has received substantial support from national funding agencies, such as the European Union projects PQCrypto and SAFEcrypto. The USA National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST) started the post-quantum standardization project in 2012, organized a worldwide ‘competition’ in 2016 and plans to deliver draft standards before 2024. After two rounds of evaluation, seven schemes were accepted as the round-three candidates on 22 July 2020, of which five are lattice-based schemes. In 2017, the International organization for standardization started a study project of post-quantum cryptography named SD8. Most LWE-based PKE schemes such as Kyber and LAC follow the Lindner-Peikert framework [3] up to the choices of ring structure, noise distribution and parameters. As the size of noise in lattice-based PKEs/EKMs is typically larger than the lower bits of the ciphertext, many schemes often artificially drop a few lower bits to optimize the practical performance without significantly increasing the final decryption noise. Kyber [4] is one of the most promising PKE/KEM candidates in the NIST PQC standardization, whose security is provably based on the difficulty of so-called module LWE (MLWE) problems. The use of MLWE allowed Kyber to obtain additional flexibility and security advantages, while keeping the same efficiency as those based on the ring-LWE problems. The strategy of dropping some lower bits is used to compress both the public-key and ciphertext sizes. For a targeted 128-bit quantum security, the public-key and ciphertext sizes of Kyber is around a single kilobyte. LAC [5] uses several techniques to reduce the modulus as small as possible: it uses a byte-level modulus, embeds powerful error-correcting codes to maximize the noise-modulus rate, provides a different style of modulus to avoid potential attacks for special polynomial ring structures and optimizes the polynomial multiplication algorithm of the bit-level secret and noise. Based on these techniques, LAC reduces the public key to 544–1056 bytes and the ciphertext to 664–1464 bytes. Meanwhile, it achieves similar computational performance compared with NTT technique schemes. By observing the asymmetries in lattice-based cryptosystems, Zhang and Yu et al. [6] proposed asymmetric MLWE and asymmetric MSIS problems, which yield further size-optimized KEMs and signature schemes to those from standard counterparts. Compared to the seven NIST round-three candidates at Category III security, their KEM scheme has parameters (public key + ciphertext size) smaller than Classic McEliece, CRYSTALS-Kyber, NTRU and Saber; their signature scheme has parameters (public key + signature size) smaller than CRYSTALS-Dilithium and Rainbow, but slightly larger than FALCON, where CRYSTALS-Kyber, NTRU, Saber, CRYSTALS-Dilithium and FALCON are lattice-based schemes. One important application of lattice-based PKEs/KEMs is to build authenticated key exchange (AKE), which could provide additional authentication to the established session key. There are several generic ways to construct AKE from lattice-based PKEs/KEMs. In the PKE setting, Xue and Lu et al. [7] proposed a more compact KEM-based framework via a new primitive named ‘2-key KEM’, which shares some item between different ciphertexts. In the only password setting, Zhang and Yu [8] presented a two-round PAKE framework from the splittable-PKEs that can be instantiated from lattices. The only known AKE that does not rely on lattice-based PKEs/KEMs was given in Ref. [9], which has two-round messages and provides implicit authentication. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (6197239 to X.L.; 62022018 and 61932019 to J.Z.) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB0804105 to J.Z.). Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
The security of classical public-key cryptosystems, which operate based on the computational intractability of integer factorization and discrete logarithm problems, is profoundly threatened by the rapid development of quantum computing. Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) has been proposed to improve security against quantum attacks. Lattice-based cryptography is widely regarded as one of the most promising PQC method because of its proven security, efficient implementation, and functional versatility, and it has achieved significant progress in both algorithmic design and engineering implementation in recent years. This paper presents a systematic survey of the status of research on lattice-based cryptographic algorithms. First, the fundamental theory of lattices and their core hard problems are discussed. Next, the technical characteristics and performance of encryption and key encapsulation mechanisms, digital signature schemes, and key exchange protocols constructed based on lattice hard problems are reviewed and compared. Subsequently, the principles and optimization paths of two key technologies for lattice cryptography implementation, namely polynomial multiplication using the fast Number Theoretic Transform (NTT) and pre-image sampling algorithms, are discussed. Finally, considering the PQC standardization process of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an outlook on future research directions for lattice-based cryptography is presented. The research directions include the development of more "succinct" fundamental hard problems, strengthening security proofs, improving algorithm efficiency, and countering novel attacks. This review serves as a reference for promoting the practical deployment and further research of lattice-based cryptography.
Public-key cryptography is an indispensable component used in almost all of our present-day digital infrastructure. However, most if not all of it is predominantly built upon hardness guarantees of number theoretic problems that can be broken by large-scale quantum computers in the future. Sensing the imminent threat from continued advances in quantum computing, NIST has recently initiated a global-level standardization process for quantum resistant public-key cryptographic primitives such as public-key encryption, digital signatures, and key encapsulation mechanisms. While the process received proposals from various categories of post-quantum cryptography, lattice-based cryptography features most prominently among all the submissions. Lattice-based cryptography offers a very attractive alternative to traditional public-key cryptography mainly due to the variety of lattice-based schemes offering varying flavors of security and efficiency guarantees. In this article, we survey the evolution of lattice-based key-sharing schemes (public-key encryption and key encapsulation schemes) and cover various aspects ranging from theoretical security guarantees, general algorithmic frameworks, practical implementation aspects, and physical attack security, with special focus on lattice-based key-sharing schemes competing in the NIST’s standardization process.
The advent of large-scale quantum computers poses a profound and imminent threat to the foundational public-key cryptographic systems that secure modern digital communication, including RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC). These widely deployed algorithms rely on the computational intractability of factoring large integers and solving discrete logarithm problems, which are known to be efficiently solvable by Shor's algorithm on a sufficiently powerful quantum computer. This paper explores the transition to a post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) era, with a particular focus on lattice-based cryptography as a leading candidate for quantum-resistant solutions. We provide a comprehensive overview of the quantum threat, delve into the mathematical underpinnings of lattice problems, and examine prominent lattice-based schemes such as Kyber, Dilithium, and NTRU. Through a detailed literature review, theoretical analysis, and comparison with other PQC families, we highlight the security properties, efficiency considerations, and implementation challenges of lattice-based cryptography. The paper discusses the ongoing standardization efforts, particularly by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and evaluates the suitability of lattice-based schemes for securing critical infrastructure in the face of quantum adversaries. We conclude by emphasizing the urgency of cryptographic migration and the pivotal role lattice-based solutions are poised to play in safeguarding digital security in the post-RSA era.
Abstract It is viewed as revolutionary technology, offering incredible potential in terms of computing power within different scientific and industrial sectors. Quantum computers provide remarkable computing power; however, they also present significant security risks to existing public-key cryptography systems used to secure digital communication, online banking systems, government, medical applications, cloud computing systems, and IoT systems. Security of commonly used encryption schemes like RSA, DH, and ECC depends on mathematical problems that are impossible for classical computers to solve but can be easily resolved with the help of powerful enough quantum computers by using Shor’s algorithm. Furthermore, Grover’s algorithm makes exhaustive search attacks much faster, thus effectively lowering the security level of symmetric encryption schemes since it provides the speed-up for brute-force attacks. Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) turned out to be an effective and scalable method to protect digital data from attacks using quantum computing. In contrast to quantum cryptography, which requires a special quantum communication channel, PQC uses classical cryptographic algorithms that cannot be broken down by either classical or quantum computer due to certain mathematical problems. This research paper offers an extensive exploration of post-quantum cryptography through the analysis of the development of quantum computing, weaknesses of current cryptographic techniques, and mathematics behind quantum-resistant algorithms. Moreover, this paper explores the major classes of PQC techniques such as lattice-based, code-based, hash-based, multivariate, and isogeny-based cryptography and provides details about their security and application. Moreover, the report gives an overview of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Project and analyzes recent standardizations of quantum-proof algorithms to be utilized in future digital infrastructures. Keywords: Post-Quantum Encryption, Quantum Security, Quantum-Proof Public-Key Cryptography, Lattice-Based Security Protocols, ML-KEM Key Encapsulation Mechanism, ML-DSA Digital Signature Algorithm, NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography, Contemporary Cybersecurity, Secure Communications, Cryptographic Algorithms.
Alongside the growth of technology is the increasing demand for security of data and communication channels. As attacking power grows, devices become smaller and data expands, the security needs to be stronger yet less resource-consuming than ever before. Public key cryptography (PKC) is used in the majority of today's communications systems. The security of public-key cryptographic schemes, such as RSA and elliptic curve cryptography (ECC), is based on underlying mathematical problems such as factoring large integers or solving the discrete log problem. However, the discovery of Shor's Algorithm in 1994 insinuates that these schemes will be insecure when a full-scale quantum computer is developed, as these problems will be solvable in polynomial time. Therefore attention has moved towards post-quantum, or quantum-safe, cryptography (QSC). In 2016, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced the beginning of their efforts to migrate to QSC, a standardisation process which has involved the cryptographic community worldwide. There are five main types of QSC being considered for standardisation; lattice-based, code-based, multivariate-based, hash-based and isogeny-based. Lattice-based cryptography (LBC) offers a promising alternative to today's classical approaches. Hard problems based on lattices are believed to be unsolvable, even by a quantum-computer, in a feasible amount of time. In 1995, Ajtai showed that the average case complexity of these problems is at least as hard as solving the problems in the worst case. Furthermore, lattice-based schemes are the only remaining contender in the NIST process to provide the important primitives of encryption, key encapsulation and digital signature schemes (DSSs). A well-recognised open problem surrounding quantum-safe cryptography is its increase in bandwidth and computational complexity in comparison to existing cryptography. However, in comparison to other quantum-safe schemes, LBC has been shown to be relatively efficient. In this thesis, novel software designs of lattice-based schemes are presented and shown to be competitive with existing PKC. Additionally, physical attacks are considered and countermeasures are incorporated into the designs. DSSs are required for authentication, integrity and non-repudiation of data. This thesis provides an evaluation of three leading signature schemes, BLISS-B, Dilithium and \textsc{Falcon}, which vary in terms of their key features, such as the sampling processes used, and the structure of the lattices. Physical attacks on the three schemes are considered and the effect on performance of appropriate attack countermeasures is evaluated. A novel fault attack on the NIST candidate \textsc{Falcon} is also proposed. A further advantage of LBC is the ability to support cryptographic primitives with extended capabilities to facilitate certificate management and compute on encrypted data. The complexity of today's technology advances mean applications require more sophisticated primitives, which contrastingly are required to run on even smaller platforms. This thesis presents novel quantum-safe advanced cryptographic schemes, specifically lattice-based identity-based encryption (IBE) and hierarchical identity-based encryption (HIBE). IBE removes the need for certificate management, as a user's public key depends on their public identity. IBE is currently used in vital applications such as emergency services communication and so the development of a high-performance quantum-safe alternative is imperative. This thesis also introduces the first scalable HIBE scheme based on lattices. The first HIBE scheme based on structured lattices, Latte, was proposed by the National Centre for Cyber Security (NCSC) in 2017. However, the public key and ciphertext sizes increased with each delegation and hence it was not feasible to scale the algorithm. Skinny Latte, proposed in this thesis, remedies this issue by fixing the dimension of the lattice, thereby making public key and ciphertext sizes constant. This research also shows that it is practical for real-world deployment. Overall, this thesis demonstrates that lattice-based cryptography is practical for real-world applications. It considers both theoretical and physical attacks, and presents novel designs of advanced quantum-safe cryptographic primitives, which have only yet been realised by lattices.