Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Quantum mechanics does not allow violation of the pigeon counting principle

G. Kunstatter, Jonathan Ziprick

Published Aug 20, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127642

Related papers

Measuring the past of quantum systems: from counting quantum pigeons to watching atoms as they tunnel

Aephraim M. Steinberg

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 6, 2018•0 citations

Quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle and the nature of quantum correlations

Yakir Aharonov, Fabrizio Colombo, Sandu Popescu +3 more

The pigeonhole principle: "If you put three pigeons in two pigeonholes, at least two of the pigeons end up in the same hole," is an obvious yet fundamental principle of nature as it captures the very essence of counting. Here however we show that in quantum mechanics this is not true! We find instances when three quantum particles are put in two boxes, yet no two particles are in the same box. Furthermore, we show that the above "quantum pigeonhole principle" is only one of a host of related quantum effects, and points to a very interesting structure of quantum mechanics that was hitherto unnoticed. Our results shed new light on the very notions of separability and correlations in quantum mechanics and on the nature of interactions. It also presents a new role for entanglement, complementary to the usual one. Finally, interferometric experiments that illustrate our effects are proposed.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences•Jan 4, 2016•76 citations

The quantum pigeonhole principle as a violation of the principle of bivalence

Arkady Bolotin

arXiv:1709.08977•Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations•Feb 14, 2018•1 citation

Variable-strength nonlocal measurements reveal quantum violations of classical counting principles

Noah Lupu-Gladstein, Ou Teen Arthur Pang, Hugo Ferretti +4 more

We implement a variant of the quantum pigeonhole paradox thought experiment to study whether classical counting principles survive in the quantum domain. We observe strong measurements significantly violate the pigeonhole principle (that among three pigeons in two holes, at least one pair must be in the same hole) and the sum rule (that the number of pigeon pairs in the same hole is the sum of the number of pairs across each of the holes) in an ensemble that is pre- and postselected into particular separable states. To investigate whether measurement disturbance is a viable explanation for these counterintuitive phenomena, we employ a we employ variable-strength nonlocal measurements. As we decrease the measurement strength, we find the violation of the sum rule decreases, yet the pigeonhole principle remains violated. In the weak limit, the sum rule is restored due to the cancellation between two weak values with equal and opposite imaginary parts. We observe the same kind of cancellation at higher measurement strengths, thus raising the question: do strong measurements have imaginary parts?

arXiv:2408.03398•Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences•Feb 14, 2025•0 citations

Coherent Viewpoint on Quantum Violations of the Pigeonhole Principle

Xi-Jun Ren, Pei Wang

•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Photons reveal a weird effect called the quantum pigeonhole paradox

Emily Conover

Access Science•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations
The pigeonhole principle: "If you put three pigeons in two pigeonholes, at least two of the pigeons end up in the same hole," is an obvious yet fundamental principle of nature as it captures the very essence of counting. Here however we show that in quantum mechanics this is not true! We find instances when three quantum particles are put in two boxes, yet no two particles are in the same box. Furthermore, we show that the above "quantum pigeonhole principle" is only one of a host of related quantum effects, and points to a very interesting structure of quantum mechanics that was hitherto unnoticed. Our results shed new light on the very notions of separability and correlations in quantum mechanics and on the nature of interactions. It also presents a new role for entanglement, complementary to the usual one. Finally, interferometric experiments that illustrate our effects are proposed.
We implement a variant of the quantum pigeonhole paradox thought experiment to study whether classical counting principles survive in the quantum domain. We observe strong measurements significantly violate the pigeonhole principle (that among three pigeons in two holes, at least one pair must be in the same hole) and the sum rule (that the number of pigeon pairs in the same hole is the sum of the number of pairs across each of the holes) in an ensemble that is pre- and postselected into particular separable states. To investigate whether measurement disturbance is a viable explanation for these counterintuitive phenomena, we employ a we employ variable-strength nonlocal measurements. As we decrease the measurement strength, we find the violation of the sum rule decreases, yet the pigeonhole principle remains violated. In the weak limit, the sum rule is restored due to the cancellation between two weak values with equal and opposite imaginary parts. We observe the same kind of cancellation at higher measurement strengths, thus raising the question: do strong measurements have imaginary parts?