Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Essays

An explanation of psychophysical interactions in the quantum double-slit experiment

Rajat Kumar Pradhan

Published Sep 10, 2015• 10 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.4006/0836-1398-28.3.324

Related papers

Independent verification of psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern

Wolfgang Baer

Physics Essays•Mar 2, 2015•9 citations

Reassessment of an independent verification of psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern

Dean I. Radin, Leena Michel, Arnaud Delorme A

Physics Essays•Dec 10, 2015•9 citations

Advanced analysis of quantum contextuality in a psychophysical double-detection experiment

Víctor H. Cervantes, Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov

arXiv:1611.04184•Journal of Mathematical Psychology•Apr 8, 2017•9 citations

Quantum measurements are physical processes. Comment on "Consciousness and the double-slit interference pattern: Six experiments," by Dean Radin et al. [Phys. Essays 25, 157 (2012)].

Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi

The validity of the assertion that some recent double-slit interference experiments, conducted by Radin et al., would have tested the possible role of the experimenter's mind in the collapse of the quantum wave function, is questioned. It is emphasized that quantum mechanics doesn't need any psychophysical ingredient to explain the measurement processes, and therefore parapsychologists shouldn't resort to the latter to support the possibility of psychokinesis, but search for more convincing explanations.

arXiv:1207.0804•Physics Essays•Mar 1, 2013•5 citations

Quantum Phenomena and the Double-Slit Experiment

Arkady Plotnitsky

Springer eBooks•Aug 3, 2009•2 citations

A New Theory of the Double-Slit Experiment

Jiankun Lai

•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations
The validity of the assertion that some recent double-slit interference experiments, conducted by Radin et al., would have tested the possible role of the experimenter's mind in the collapse of the quantum wave function, is questioned. It is emphasized that quantum mechanics doesn't need any psychophysical ingredient to explain the measurement processes, and therefore parapsychologists shouldn't resort to the latter to support the possibility of psychokinesis, but search for more convincing explanations.