Abstract John Wheeler's delayed choice thought experiment is often invoked in discussions of the wave-particle duality of quantum physics. Every so often interpretations are offered that do not restrict to straight physics. The key element of the 'Gedankenexperiment' is a Mach–Zehnder interferometer composed of two optical beam splitters. The quantum description of these devices and the treatment of delayed choice experiment in the framework of quantum optics are discussed here.
Abstract John Wheeler's delayed choice thought experiment is often invoked in discussions of the wave-particle duality of quantum physics. Every so often interpretations are offered that do not restrict to straight physics. The key element of the 'Gedankenexperiment' is a Mach–Zehnder interferometer composed of two optical beam splitters. The quantum description of these devices and the treatment of delayed choice experiment in the framework of quantum optics are discussed here.
Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment demonstrates wave-particle duality of particles using different experimental configurations of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In a quantum version of this experiment, the wave-particle behavior of photons can be observed by controlling presence or absence of the second beam splitter. Here, we implement a delayed-choice experiment with dual selections based on entangled photons, experimentally controlling both of two beam splitters in the Mach-Zehnder interferometer, where the presence and absence of the second beam splitter are simultaneously controlled through path encoding. Our experiment reveals the wave-particle behavior of single photons under different configurations of two beam splitters. We further discuss the scenario when two beam splitters are in a quantum superposition of being present and absent, photons will be in a wave-particle quantum superposition state.
Here, we present an analysis and interpretation of the experiment performed by Jacques et al. (2007 Science 315, 966), which represents a realization of Wheeler's delayed-choice Gedankenexperiment. Our analysis is based on the evolution of the photon state, since the photon enters into the Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a removable beam-splitter until it exits. Given the same incident photon state onto the output beam-splitter, BS_output, the photon's state at the exit will be very different depending on whether BS_output is on or off. Hence, the statistics of photon counts collected by the two detectors, positioned along orthogonal directions at the exit of the interferometer, is also going to be very different in either case. Therefore, it is not that the choice of inserting (on) or removing (off) a beam-splitter leads to a delayed influence on the photon behavior before arriving at the beam-splitter, but that such a choice influences the photon state at and after BS_output, i.e., after it has exited from the Mach-Zehnder interferometer. The random on/off choice at BS_output has no delayed effect on the photon to behave as a wave or a corpuscle at the entrance and inside the interferometer, but influences the subsequent evolution of the photon state incident onto BS_output.
Here, we present an analysis and interpretation of the experiment performed by Jacques et al. (2007 Science 315 966), which represents a realization of Wheeler's delayed-choice Gedankenexperiment.Our analysis is based on the evolution of the photon state, since the photon enters into the Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a removable beam-splitter until it exits.Given the same incident photon state onto the output beam-splitter, BSoutput, the photon's state at the exit will be very different depending on whether BSoutput is on or off.Hence, the statistics of photon counts collected by the two detectors, positioned along orthogonal directions at the exit of the interferometer, is also going to be very different in either case.Therefore, it is not that the choice of inserting (on) or removing (off) a beam-splitter leads to a delayed influence on the photon behavior before arriving at the beam-splitter, but that such a choice influences the photon state at and after BSoutput, i.e., after it has exited from the Mach-Zehnder interferometer.The random on/off choice at BSoutput has no delayed effect on the photon to behave as a wave or a corpuscle at the entrance and inside the interferometer, but influences the subsequent evolution of the photon state incident onto BSoutput.
A quantum system can behave as a wave or as a particle, depending on the experimental arrangement. When, for example, measuring a photon using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, the photon acts as a wave if the second beam splitter is inserted, but as a particle if this beam splitter is omitted. The decision of whether or not to insert this beam splitter can be made after the photon has entered the interferometer, as in Wheeler's famous delayed-choice thought experiment. In recent quantum versions of this experiment, this decision is controlled by a quantum ancilla, while the beam splitter is itself still a classical object. Here, we propose and realize a variant of the quantum delayed-choice experiment. We configure a superconducting quantum circuit as a Ramsey interferometer, where the element that acts as the first beam splitter can be put in a quantum superposition of its active and inactive states, as verified by the negative values of its Wigner function. We show that this enables the wave and particle aspects of the system to be observed with a single setup, without involving an ancilla that is not itself a part of the interferometer. We also study the transition of this quantum beam splitter from a quantum to a classical object due to decoherence, as observed by monitoring the interferometer output.
Wheeler’s gedanken experiment is the most fascinating and subtle illustration of wave-particle duality [1]. If we consider a single-photon light pulse in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, one can either measure the interference at the output – evidencing the “wave-like” behavior of the photon- or one can detect the path followed by the photon – evidencing its “particle-like” behavior. In order to pinpoint how surprising this is, John Wheeler considered a “delayed-choice” regime where the choice of measuring either property is done only after the photon has entered the interferometer.
The Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) is used to illustrate the long-standing wave-particle duality problem. How can the photon divide at the first beam splitter and yet terminate on either arm with its undiminished energy? Why is which-way (welcher weg) information incompatible with wave interference? How do we explain Wheeler’s delayed choice experiment? The position adopted is that the photon has two identities, one supporting particle features and the other wave features. There is photon kinetic energy that never splits (on half-silvered mirrors) or diffracts (in pinholes or slits). Then there is photon probability waves that do diffract and can reinforce or cancel. Interpretations of these two identities are suggested.