Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Danish Yearbook of Philosophy

The Correspondence Principle History and Present State

U. A. Radžabov

Published Aug 20, 1980• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1163/24689300-01701006

Related papers

History and Meaning of the Quantum Correspondence Principle

Insok Ko

철학논총•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

A brief survey of various formulations of the correspondence principle

Adam J. Makowski

Several formulations of the correspondence principle, including both the historical and contemporary ones, are presented and critically reviewed.

European Journal of Physics•Jul 17, 2006•18 citations

The correspondence principle of Niels Bohr

C.J. Fraza

“There was rarely in the history of physics a comprehensive theory which owed so much to one principle as quantum mechanics owed to Bohr's correspondence principle”

•Sep 9, 2015•0 citations

The Correspondence Principle (1918–1923)

Niels Bohr•Jan 1, 1976•21 citations

Correspondence Principle

Wladyslaw A. Krajewski

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1977•7 citations

Determinism and Correspondence Principle for Single History Systems

R. M. Angelo

The problem of deterministic predictions for individual systems is investigated in both quantum and Newtonian theories. In this context, the break time defined originally in Ehrenfest's work [P. Ehrenfest, Z. Phys. 45, 455 (1927)] emerges as the characteristic time scale of determinism, i.e., the one beyond which both theories miss their practical predictability for a single history system. Contrary to the claim of recent works, these results recover the importance of the Ehrenfest time in the understanding of the quantum-classical transition. As a consequence, the problem of breakdown in correspondence principle for closed systems turns out to be nonessential.

•Jun 14, 2005•0 citations
The problem of deterministic predictions for individual systems is investigated in both quantum and Newtonian theories. In this context, the break time defined originally in Ehrenfest's work [P. Ehrenfest, Z. Phys. 45, 455 (1927)] emerges as the characteristic time scale of determinism, i.e., the one beyond which both theories miss their practical predictability for a single history system. Contrary to the claim of recent works, these results recover the importance of the Ehrenfest time in the understanding of the quantum-classical transition. As a consequence, the problem of breakdown in correspondence principle for closed systems turns out to be nonessential.