Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Japanese Journal of Applied Physics

Ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic polarization in the extended Hubbard model.

Wei G-Z, Nie H-Q, Zhang K-Y

Published Jan 1, 1987• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in the One- and Two-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Models

Akiomi Mishima

金沢工業大学研究紀要 A•Jan 1, 1978•0 citations

Antiferromagnetism, ferromagnetism and superconductivity in the Hubbard model with repulsion

Victor Nikolaevich Popov

Journal of Mathematical Sciences•Dec 1, 1992•1 citation

Hubbard-model: Instabilities of the paramagnetic phase towards ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic ordering

Otto Krisement

The European Physical Journal A•Dec 1, 1974•3 citations

Stability of Itinerant Ferromagnetism versus Antiferromagnetism in the Single Band Hubbard Model

H. Capellmann

De Gruyter eBooks•Dec 31, 1974•0 citations

Competition between Singlet and Triplet Superconductivity in the Extended Hubbard Model with Exchange Interaction on a Square Lattice

Yoshiki Hori, Akira Goto

Phase boundary between spin singlet and triplet superconductivity in the extended Hubbard model with exchange interaction on a square lattice is calculated within meanfield approximation. Basically, antiferromagnetic exchange interaction J is advantageous for the singlet pairing, while ferromagnetic J prefers the triplet pairing. When off-site interaction V is repulsive, the singlet phase and the triplet phase are separated by normal state in the phase diagram against V and J . If V is effectively attractive, however, the singlet and triplet states can compete against each other. We calculate the phase boundary between singlet and triplet phase for various band filling. It is shown that the triplet phase penetrates rather deeply into antiferromagnetic exchange regime for lower band filling, whereas the penetration of the singlet phase is confined in a narrow range of ferromagnetic exchange regime.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Dec 17, 2012•1 citation

Ferromagnetism in the Hubbard model

Andreas Mielke, Hal Tasaki

Communications in Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1993•369 citations
Phase boundary between spin singlet and triplet superconductivity in the extended Hubbard model with exchange interaction on a square lattice is calculated within meanfield approximation. Basically, antiferromagnetic exchange interaction J is advantageous for the singlet pairing, while ferromagnetic J prefers the triplet pairing. When off-site interaction V is repulsive, the singlet phase and the triplet phase are separated by normal state in the phase diagram against V and J . If V is effectively attractive, however, the singlet and triplet states can compete against each other. We calculate the phase boundary between singlet and triplet phase for various band filling. It is shown that the triplet phase penetrates rather deeply into antiferromagnetic exchange regime for lower band filling, whereas the penetration of the singlet phase is confined in a narrow range of ferromagnetic exchange regime.