In recent years, several experimental groups have claimed demonstrations of ``quantum supremacy'' or computational quantum advantage. A notable first claim by Google Quantum AI revolves around a metric called the Linear Cross Entropy Benchmarking (Linear XEB), which has been used in many quantum supremacy experiments since. The complexity-theoretic hardness of spoofing Linear XEB, however, depends on the Cross-Entropy Quantum Threshold (XQUATH) conjecture put forth by Aaronson and Gunn, which has been disproven for sublinear depth circuits. In the efforts on demonstrating quantum supremacy by quantum Hamiltonian simulation, a similar benchmarking metric called the System Linear Cross Entropy Score (sXES) holds firm in light of the aforementioned negative result due to its fundamental distinction with Linear XEB. Moreover, the complexity-theoretic hardness of spoofing sXES rests on the System Linear Cross-Entropy Quantum Threshold Assumption (sXQUATH), the formal relationship of which to XQUATH is unclear. Despite the promises offered by sXES for future demonstration of quantum supremacy, in this work we show that it can be classically simulated efficiently in certain regimes.
A major milestone in the era of noisy intermediate scale quantum computers is \textit{quantum supremacy} [Nature \textbf{574}, 505 (2019)] claimed on the Sycamore quantum processor of
53 qubits, which can perform a random circuit sampling task within
200 seconds while the same task is estimated to require a runtime of
10,000 years on Summit. This record has been renewed with two recent experiments on the Zuchongzhi
2.0 (
56 qubits) and Zuchongzhi
2.1 (
60 qubits) quantum processors. On the other front of quantum supremacy comparison, there has also been continuous improvements on both the classical simulation algorithm as well as the underlying hardware. And a fair justification of the computational advantages for those quantum supremacy experiments would require to practically simulate the same problems on current top supercomputers, which is still in lack. Here we report the full-scale simulations of these problems on new generation Sunway supercomputer, based on a customized tensor network contraction algorithm. Our benchmark shows that the most challenging sampling task performed on Sycamore can be accomplished within
1 week, thus collapsing the quantum supremacy claim of Sycamore. Additionally, we show that the XEB fidelities of the \textit{quantum supremacy circuits} with up to
14 cycles can be verified in minutes, which also provides strong consistency check for quantum supremacy experiments. Our results redefine quantum supremacy baseline using the new generation Sunway supercomputer.
In October 2019, Nature published a paper [6] describing an experimental work that was performed at Google. The paper claims to demonstrate quantum (computational) supremacy on a 53-qubit quantum computer. Since then we have been involved in a long-term project to study various statistical aspects of the Google experiment. In [30] we studied Google's statistical framework that we found to be very sound and offered some technical improvements. This document describes three main concerns (based on statistical analysis) about the Google 2019 experiment. The first concern is that the data do not agree with Google's noise model (or any other specific model). The second concern is that a crucial simple formula for a priori estimation of the fidelity seems to involve an unexpected independence assumption, and yet it gives very accurate predictions. The third concern is about statistical properties of the calibration process.