Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Comparison of energy minimization and variance minimization methods for optimizing variational parameters in many body wave functions

Cyrus J. Umrigar, Claudia Filippi

Published Mar 21, 2005• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Monte Carlo energy and variance-minimization techniques for optimizing many-body wave functions

Paul R. C. Kent, Richard J. Needs, Gunaretnam Rajagopal

We investigate Monte Carlo energy and variance-minimization techniques for optimizing many-body wave functions. Several variants of the basic techniques are studied, including limiting the variations in the weighting factors that arise in correlated sampling estimations of the energy and its variance. We investigate the numerical stability of the techniques and identify two reasons why variance minimization exhibits superior numerical stability to energy minimization. The characteristics of each method are studied using a noninteracting 64-electron model of crystalline silicon. While our main interest is in solid-state systems, the issues investigated are relevant to Monte Carlo studies of atoms, molecules, and solids. We identify a robust and efficient variance-minimization scheme for optimizing wave functions for large systems.

arXiv:cond-mat/9902300•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•May 15, 1999•109 citations

Variational Optimization of Many-Body Wave Functions

Ryo Maezono

Springer eBooks•Nov 8, 2025•0 citations

Energy and Variance Optimization of Many-Body Wave Functions

Cyrus J. Umrigar, Claudia Filippi

We present a simple, robust, and efficient method for varying the parameters in a many-body wave function to optimize the expectation value of the energy. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated by optimizing the parameters in flexible Jastrow factors that include 3-body electron-electron-nucleus correlation terms for the NO2 and decapentaene (C10H12) molecules. The basic idea is to add terms to the straightforward expression for the Hessian of the energy that have zero expectation value, but that cancel much of the statistical fluctuations for a finite Monte Carlo sample. The method is compared to what is currently the most popular method for optimizing many-body wave functions, namely, minimization of the variance of the local energy. The most efficient wave function is obtained by optimizing a linear combination of the energy and the variance.

arXiv:cond-mat/0412634•Physical Review Letters•Apr 21, 2005•196 citations

Optimization of Variational Wave Functions

Federico Becca, Sandro Sorella

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 29, 2017•2 citations

Stochastic method of optimizing the basis for variational calculations of many-particle systems

V. I. Kukulin

•Jan 1, 1975•0 citations

Optimization of quantum Monte Carlo wave functions by energy minimization

Julien Toulouse, Cyrus J. Umrigar

We study three wave function optimization methods based on energy minimization in a variational Monte Carlo framework: the Newton, linear, and perturbative methods. In the Newton method, the parameter variations are calculated from the energy gradient and Hessian, using a reduced variance statistical estimator for the latter. In the linear method, the parameter variations are found by diagonalizing a nonsymmetric estimator of the Hamiltonian matrix in the space spanned by the wave function and its derivatives with respect to the parameters, making use of a strong zero-variance principle. In the less computationally expensive perturbative method, the parameter variations are calculated by approximately solving the generalized eigenvalue equation of the linear method by a nonorthogonal perturbation theory. These general methods are illustrated here by the optimization of wave functions consisting of a Jastrow factor multiplied by an expansion in configuration state functions (CSFs) for the C2 molecule, including both valence and core electrons in the calculation. The Newton and linear methods are very efficient for the optimization of the Jastrow, CSF, and orbital parameters. The perturbative method is a good alternative for the optimization of just the CSF and orbital parameters. Although the optimization is performed at the variational Monte Carlo level, we observe for the C2 molecule studied here, and for other systems we have studied, that as more parameters in the trial wave functions are optimized, the diffusion Monte Carlo total energy improves monotonically, implying that the nodal hypersurface also improves monotonically.

arXiv:physics/0701039•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 22, 2007•290 citations
We investigate Monte Carlo energy and variance-minimization techniques for optimizing many-body wave functions. Several variants of the basic techniques are studied, including limiting the variations in the weighting factors that arise in correlated sampling estimations of the energy and its variance. We investigate the numerical stability of the techniques and identify two reasons why variance minimization exhibits superior numerical stability to energy minimization. The characteristics of each method are studied using a noninteracting 64-electron model of crystalline silicon. While our main interest is in solid-state systems, the issues investigated are relevant to Monte Carlo studies of atoms, molecules, and solids. We identify a robust and efficient variance-minimization scheme for optimizing wave functions for large systems.
We present a simple, robust, and efficient method for varying the parameters in a many-body wave function to optimize the expectation value of the energy. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated by optimizing the parameters in flexible Jastrow factors that include 3-body electron-electron-nucleus correlation terms for the NO2 and decapentaene (C10H12) molecules. The basic idea is to add terms to the straightforward expression for the Hessian of the energy that have zero expectation value, but that cancel much of the statistical fluctuations for a finite Monte Carlo sample. The method is compared to what is currently the most popular method for optimizing many-body wave functions, namely, minimization of the variance of the local energy. The most efficient wave function is obtained by optimizing a linear combination of the energy and the variance.
We study three wave function optimization methods based on energy minimization in a variational Monte Carlo framework: the Newton, linear, and perturbative methods. In the Newton method, the parameter variations are calculated from the energy gradient and Hessian, using a reduced variance statistical estimator for the latter. In the linear method, the parameter variations are found by diagonalizing a nonsymmetric estimator of the Hamiltonian matrix in the space spanned by the wave function and its derivatives with respect to the parameters, making use of a strong zero-variance principle. In the less computationally expensive perturbative method, the parameter variations are calculated by approximately solving the generalized eigenvalue equation of the linear method by a nonorthogonal perturbation theory. These general methods are illustrated here by the optimization of wave functions consisting of a Jastrow factor multiplied by an expansion in configuration state functions (CSFs) for the C2 molecule, including both valence and core electrons in the calculation. The Newton and linear methods are very efficient for the optimization of the Jastrow, CSF, and orbital parameters. The perturbative method is a good alternative for the optimization of just the CSF and orbital parameters. Although the optimization is performed at the variational Monte Carlo level, we observe for the C2 molecule studied here, and for other systems we have studied, that as more parameters in the trial wave functions are optimized, the diffusion Monte Carlo total energy improves monotonically, implying that the nodal hypersurface also improves monotonically.