Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A mathematical study of the non-relativistic limit in quantum mechanics

Ross J. Cirincione

Published Jan 1, 1979• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Mathematical Formulation of Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Valter Moretti

Unitext•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Mathematical formulation of non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Valter Moretti

Unitext•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Rutherford Scattering: a comparison between Classical Mechanics, Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, and Quantum Field Theory

José Orlando Rodrigues da Cunha Filho, Lucas de Castro Rodrigues Barros

This is a review article that investigates the three approaches to Rutherford Scattering Theory - Classical Mechanics, Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, and Quantum Field Theory - and their distinctions. In the first sections, the mathematical models are demonstrated and a qualitative analysis of the main differences in each interpretation of the phenomenon is performed. Next, numerical simulations show the effects of dealing with relativistic or non-relativistic limits. The results make it clear that no theory is essentially wrong, but the newer ones are just more complete and consider more relevant parameters.

•Dec 21, 2021•0 citations

The Theory of Special Relativity

P. Strange

Relativistic quantum mechanics is the unification into a consistent theory of Einstein's theory of relativity and the quantum mechanics of physicists such as Bohr, Schrödinger, and Heisenberg. Evidently, to appreciate relativistic quantum theory it is necessary to have a good understanding of these component theories. Apart from this chapter we assume the reader has this understanding. However, here we are going to recall some of the important points of the classical theory of special relativity. There is good reason for doing this. As you will discover all too soon, relativistic quantum mechanics is a very mathematical subject and my experience has been that the complexity of the mathematics often obscures the physics being described. To facilitate the interpretation of the mathematics here, appropriate limits are taken wherever possible, to obtain expressions with which the reader should be familiar. Clearly, when this is done it is useful to have the limiting expressions handy. Presenting them in this chapter means they can be referred to easily. Taking the above argument to its logical conclusion means we should include a chapter on non-relativistic quantum mechanics as well. However, that is too vast a subject to include in a single chapter. Furthermore, there already exists a plethora of good books on the subject.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 17, 1998•0 citations

Semi-classical limit of relativistic quantum mechanics

Ladislav Kocis

Pramana•Jul 1, 2005•1 citation

Classical mechanics as the high-entropy limit of quantum mechanics

Gabriele Carcassi, Manuele Landini, C. Aidala

Abstract We show that classical mechanics can be recovered as the high-entropy limit of quantum mechanics. That is, the high entropy masks quantum effects, and mixed states of high enough entropy can be approximated with classical distributions. The mathematical limit ℏ → 0 can be reinterpreted as setting the zero entropy of pure states to −∞, in the same way that non-relativistic mechanics can be recovered mathematically with c → ∞. Physically, these limits are more appropriately defined as S ≫ 0 and v ≪ c . Both limits can then be understood as approximations independently of what circumstances allow those approximations to be valid. Consequently, the limit presented is independent of possible underlying mechanisms and of what interpretation is chosen for both quantum states and entropy.

arXiv:2411.00972•Physica Scripta•Jan 19, 2026•0 citations
This is a review article that investigates the three approaches to Rutherford Scattering Theory - Classical Mechanics, Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, and Quantum Field Theory - and their distinctions. In the first sections, the mathematical models are demonstrated and a qualitative analysis of the main differences in each interpretation of the phenomenon is performed. Next, numerical simulations show the effects of dealing with relativistic or non-relativistic limits. The results make it clear that no theory is essentially wrong, but the newer ones are just more complete and consider more relevant parameters.
Relativistic quantum mechanics is the unification into a consistent theory of Einstein's theory of relativity and the quantum mechanics of physicists such as Bohr, Schrödinger, and Heisenberg. Evidently, to appreciate relativistic quantum theory it is necessary to have a good understanding of these component theories. Apart from this chapter we assume the reader has this understanding. However, here we are going to recall some of the important points of the classical theory of special relativity. There is good reason for doing this. As you will discover all too soon, relativistic quantum mechanics is a very mathematical subject and my experience has been that the complexity of the mathematics often obscures the physics being described. To facilitate the interpretation of the mathematics here, appropriate limits are taken wherever possible, to obtain expressions with which the reader should be familiar. Clearly, when this is done it is useful to have the limiting expressions handy. Presenting them in this chapter means they can be referred to easily. Taking the above argument to its logical conclusion means we should include a chapter on non-relativistic quantum mechanics as well. However, that is too vast a subject to include in a single chapter. Furthermore, there already exists a plethora of good books on the subject.
Abstract We show that classical mechanics can be recovered as the high-entropy limit of quantum mechanics. That is, the high entropy masks quantum effects, and mixed states of high enough entropy can be approximated with classical distributions. The mathematical limit ℏ → 0 can be reinterpreted as setting the zero entropy of pure states to −∞, in the same way that non-relativistic mechanics can be recovered mathematically with c → ∞. Physically, these limits are more appropriately defined as S ≫ 0 and v ≪ c . Both limits can then be understood as approximations independently of what circumstances allow those approximations to be valid. Consequently, the limit presented is independent of possible underlying mechanisms and of what interpretation is chosen for both quantum states and entropy.