In this study, we propose an improved theoretical model for the phase estimation scheme with inverse operations and compare it with the conventional phase estimation model in terms of the Fisher information and error propagation equation. In addition, we analyse the phase sensitivity of Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) and SU(1,1) interferometer (SU(1,1)I) with the coherent or squeezed states as input for intensity detection. We also discuss the phase sensitivity of MZI and SU(1,1)I with inverse displaced and inverse squeezed operations for intensity detection, and extensively compare them with and without the inverse operation scheme. Accordingly, we conclude that the phase sensitivity of interferometers can be significantly enhanced by embedding additional inverse operations.
In this study, we propose an improved theoretical model for the phase estimation scheme with inverse operations and compare it with the conventional phase estimation model in terms of the Fisher information and error propagation equation. In addition, we analyse the phase sensitivity of Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) and SU(1,1) interferometer (SU(1,1)I) with the coherent or squeezed states as input for intensity detection. We also discuss the phase sensitivity of MZI and SU(1,1)I with inverse displaced and inverse squeezed operations for intensity detection, and extensively compare them with and without the inverse operation scheme. Accordingly, we conclude that the phase sensitivity of interferometers can be significantly enhanced by embedding additional inverse operations.
Improving interferometric phase sensitivity is crucial for high-precision measurements in rapidly developing quantum technologies. The Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) is a versatile tool for analyzing this phenomenon. By splitting and recombining a light beam using beam splitters, the MZI allows for precise phase sensitivity analysis using tools like the quantum Cramér–Rao bound (QCRB) and the quantum Fisher information (QFI). This paper analyzes the phase sensitivity of an MZI in various scenarios using different detection schemes and input states. We compare the single- and two-parameter quantum estimation and their associated QCRB for three phase-shift situations: in both arms; only in the upper arm (asymmetric); and in both arms symmetrically. We then investigate the phase sensitivity under three detection schemes: intensity difference; single-mode intensity; and balanced homodyne. Additionally, we explore the use of Perelomov and Barut–Girardello coherent states, two types of SU(1,1) coherent states, in all scenarios. Notably, we demonstrate that, under optimal conditions, all detection schemes can achieve the QCRB by utilizing SU(1,1) coherent states as input states.
We theoretically study the phase estimation based on a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) with a two-mode squeezed coherent state. By maximizing the quantum Fisher information, we find that the quantum Cramér-Rao bounds (QCRB) can reach sub-Heisenberg limit under the phase-matched condition. The optimal phase sensitivity can reach the sub-shot noise limit (SNL) and approach the QCRB by employing the intensity difference detection. Meanwhile, compared with the MZI fed with a coherent plus a single-mode squeezed vacuum state, this scheme can have better performance by adjusting the squeezing parameter and the mean photon number. With the same parameter, our scheme shows more sensitive phase measurement than the SU(1,1) interferometer with a coherent plus a vacuum state. We also show that the phase sensitivity of our proposal can still reach the SNL when the loss of the photon is 36%. This scheme can provide potential applications in optical sensors.
For the precision-based measurements, Mach-Zehnder interferometry is a widely used technique. There are various ways to enhance the precision of Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), e.g., having a non-classical input state is one of the ways to enhance the precision of the phase estimation performed by MZI. The phase estimation performed by MZI is investigated here by considering that the input states of MZI are different combinations of photon added and subtracted squeezed coherent states (PASCS and PSSCS). Using quantum Fisher information, it is shown that the use of PASCS in both the input modes of MZI, provides the most precise estimate of the unknown phase. This system is also analyzed in two different measurement scenarios -- single intensity detection (SID) and intensity difference detection (IDD). Systematic analysis has established that the intensity measurement might not be an optimal measurement scheme for phase estimation in MZI as phase and intensity correspond to non-commuting observables. The impact of the photon loss on the MZI-based phase estimation setup is also studied and it is found that PASCS is robust against photon loss, when the loss in MZI is low.
Phase estimation has a wide range of applications. Over the years, several strategies have been studied to improve precision in phase estimation. These strategies include using exotic quantum states to quantum detection schemes. This dissertation summarizes my effort in improving the precision of phase estimation with a linear and nonlinear interferometer. Chapter 1 introduces quantum optics and quantum metrology. I introduce all relevant quantum states of light used. We also look into tools and terminologies of quantum metrology such as Fisher information, shot-noise limit, Heisenberg limit, etc., along with examples of phase estimation with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In Chapter 2, I discuss multiple phase estimation using a multimode interferometer. Building upon previous work, our scheme consists of a multimode interferometer with single-photon inputs. By using a quantum Fisher information analysis, we show that our scheme gives a constant improvement over other schemes. We also show that our scheme with photon-number-resolving detection approaches the quantum Cram\'er-Rao bound. Moreover, we also consider the probabilistic nature of photon emission at the input, and we study its effect on phase sensitivity. I discuss phase estimation with SU(1,1) interferometer in Chapter 3. We look at phase sensitivity in this interferometer with different input states. Namely, we consider two different phase estimation scheme, one using thermal and squeezed states, and others using coherent and displaced squeezed states with parity and on-off as a detection scheme. We also look into the effect of photon loss inside the interferometer. In Chapter 4, we revisit phase estimation in SU(1,1) interferometer from the perspective of quantum Fisher information. I discuss in detail a longstanding confusion regarding the use of quantum Fisher information in SU(1,1) interferometer. We show that phase averaging or quantum Fisher information matrix method is needed in general for calculating the phase sensitivity which resolves inconsistencies reported in previously published articles.
We study the phase super–sensitivity of a Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) with the squeezed Kerr state (SKS) and coherent state as the inputs. We discuss the lower bound in phase sensitivity by considering the quantum Fisher information and the corresponding quantum Cramér–Rao bound. With the help of single intensity detection, intensity difference detection, and homodyne detection schemes, we find that our scheme gives a better sensitivity under both lossless and lossy conditions as compared to the well–known results of the combinations of inputs, such as coherent plus vacuum, coherent plus squeezed vacuum, and double coherent states. Because of the possibility of the generation of SKS with the present available quantum optical techniques, we expect that SKS may be an alternative nonclassical resource for the improvement in the phase super–sensitivity of the MZI in realistic scenarios.
Phase-shifting interferometry (PSI) promises excellent performance for quantitative phase measurement. However, the PSI is commonly realized by utilizing the Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) fed with classical resources, and hence its phase sensitivity is hindered by the photon shot noise. In this paper, we propose to introduce specific phase-shifting algorithms into the well-established quantum-enhanced MZI, seeded by coherent and squeezed vacuum states and followed by single-mode intensity detection and difference intensity detection, to achieve quantitative phase measurement with sensitivity beyond that achieved by the corresponding Mach-Zehnder-type PSI with classical input. We show that when the average photon number of the coherent state is dominant, the optimal phase sensitivity of the Mach-Zehnder-type PSI with coherent plus squeezed vacuum input is better than the phase sensitivity of the Mach-Zehnder-type PSI with single coherent input under the same phase-sensing intensity condition in both of detection setups. We also show that for the typical MZI seeded with a high-power coherent state and a finitely squeezed vacuum state, the combination of intensity detection and phase-shifting algorithm can still improve the sensitivity of quantitative phase measurement. Furthermore, we derive the phase sensitivity of the fixed MZI as well as the quantum Cramér-Rao bound for two detection schemes. Finally, we explore the impacts of photon losses on the phase sensitivity enhancements of the Mach-Zehnder-type PSI and the fixed MZI in the high-intensity regime for each detection setup. The robustness to losses is compared between the Mach-Zehnder-type PSI and the fixed MZI. Our results may be helpful to promote the exploration of quantum-enhanced quantitative phase sensing.