Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Fluctuations and Noise in Photonics and Quantum Optics III

Philip Hemmer, Julio R. Gea-Banacloche, P. Heszler, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

Published May 1, 2005• 7 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Fluctuations and Noise in Photonics and Quantum Optics

Derek Abbott, Jeffrey H. Shapiro, Y. Yamamoto

SPIE eBooks•May 1, 2003•18 citations

Fluctuations and Noise in Photonics and Quantum Optics II

P. Heszler

•May 1, 2004•2 citations

Noise and Fluctuations in Photonics, Quantum Optics, and Communications

Leon W. Cohen

•Jul 1, 2007•1 citation

Fluctuations and noise in photonics and quantum optics III : 24-26 May 2005, Austin, Texas, USA

Philip Hemmer

SPIE eBooks•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Quantum-mechanical interference between optical transitions and the effect of laser phase noise

James C. Camparo, P. Lambropoulos

We consider three-photon--one-photon phase control of resonance-enhanced photonioization with a phase-diffusion field. As is well known, control is achieved because excitation via the fundamental field interferes with excitation via the third harmonic field, and the form of the interference (i.e., constructive or destructive) depends on the relative phase difference between the two fields. In the problem, the stochastic nature of the field influences control because the propagation constant of a dispersive medium depends on the field's fluctuating frequency. Here, we approach the influence of laser phase noise on control via (i) a physically intuitive zeroth-order approximation, (ii) first-order perturbation theory, and (iii) numerical simulation. Our results show that first-order perturbation theory is not attractive for the study of this problem, since it requires the evaluation of very high order correlation functions associated with the fundamental field"s fluctuating frequency. More importantly, however, numerical simulation demonstrates that highly efficient control can be attained even in the presence of very large linewidth fields.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1997•13 citations

Quantum noise and squeezing in an optical parametric oscillator with arbitrary output-mirror coupling. III. Effect of pump amplitude and phase fluctuations

Sudhakar Prasad

Quantum fluctuations and squeezing of the signal field generated by a degenerate optical parametric oscillator are sensitive to the phase and amplitude fluctuations of the second-harmonic pump. The analysis reported here extends our previous calculations for a perfectly monochromatic noise-free pump to allow for finite pump amplitude and phase fluctuations. We treat the typically intense pump field with its fluctuations as a classical Gaussian stochastic process in two limits: first, when the pump has amplitude fluctuations but its phase is fixed and second, when its phase diffuses but its amplitude is fixed. Since pump amplitude noise affects the evolution of the signal field multiplicatively, it has a lesser impact on the quantum fluctuations of the signal than pump phase diffusion which compromises such fluctuations via the extreme phase sensitivity of the parametric amplification process. For the latter limit, our calculations extend the work of Gea-Banacloche and Zubairy [Phys. Rev. A 42, 1742 (1990)] to cavities with arbitrary transmission coefficients for the bounding mirrors.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1994•7 citations
We consider three-photon--one-photon phase control of resonance-enhanced photonioization with a phase-diffusion field. As is well known, control is achieved because excitation via the fundamental field interferes with excitation via the third harmonic field, and the form of the interference (i.e., constructive or destructive) depends on the relative phase difference between the two fields. In the problem, the stochastic nature of the field influences control because the propagation constant of a dispersive medium depends on the field's fluctuating frequency. Here, we approach the influence of laser phase noise on control via (i) a physically intuitive zeroth-order approximation, (ii) first-order perturbation theory, and (iii) numerical simulation. Our results show that first-order perturbation theory is not attractive for the study of this problem, since it requires the evaluation of very high order correlation functions associated with the fundamental field"s fluctuating frequency. More importantly, however, numerical simulation demonstrates that highly efficient control can be attained even in the presence of very large linewidth fields.
Quantum fluctuations and squeezing of the signal field generated by a degenerate optical parametric oscillator are sensitive to the phase and amplitude fluctuations of the second-harmonic pump. The analysis reported here extends our previous calculations for a perfectly monochromatic noise-free pump to allow for finite pump amplitude and phase fluctuations. We treat the typically intense pump field with its fluctuations as a classical Gaussian stochastic process in two limits: first, when the pump has amplitude fluctuations but its phase is fixed and second, when its phase diffuses but its amplitude is fixed. Since pump amplitude noise affects the evolution of the signal field multiplicatively, it has a lesser impact on the quantum fluctuations of the signal than pump phase diffusion which compromises such fluctuations via the extreme phase sensitivity of the parametric amplification process. For the latter limit, our calculations extend the work of Gea-Banacloche and Zubairy [Phys. Rev. A 42, 1742 (1990)] to cavities with arbitrary transmission coefficients for the bounding mirrors.