Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Quantum Scattering Theories

K. N. Joshipura, Nigel John Mason

Published Dec 21, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1017/9781108551489.005

Related papers

Quantum Scattering Theory

Jesús Pérez‐Ríos

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2020•7 citations

Quantum Scattering Theory

S. Zienau

Nature•Apr 6, 1968•33 citations

Elements of Quantum Scattering Theory

Brian J. McParland

Springer eBooks•Aug 6, 2013•1 citation

Principles of Quantum Scattering Theory

Dževad Belkić

Institute of Physics eBooks•Jan 1, 2004•68 citations

Discrete Quantum Scattering Theory

V. I. Kukulin, O. A. Rubtsova

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 2003•16 citations

Through scattering theory with gun and camera: Coping with conventions in collision theory

Michael A. Morrison, Andrew N. Feldt

Four ambiguities are inherent in time-independent quantum-mechanical scattering theory: two in the normalization of continuum functions, and two in the relation between various scattering matrices. These ambiguities allow the use of different conventions in scattering theory. This freedom has led to inconsistencies among textbooks, monographs, review articles, and research papers. We identify these ambiguities, indicate their context and origin in scattering theory, give the key equations of scattering theory in a form that can by adapted to any convention, and show interrelations between these equations that can lead to confusion and error. We also give several diagnostic approaches for determining the conventions used in a particular source, and reference conventions adopted in widely used books on scattering theory.

American Journal of Physics•Dec 13, 2006•11 citations
Four ambiguities are inherent in time-independent quantum-mechanical scattering theory: two in the normalization of continuum functions, and two in the relation between various scattering matrices. These ambiguities allow the use of different conventions in scattering theory. This freedom has led to inconsistencies among textbooks, monographs, review articles, and research papers. We identify these ambiguities, indicate their context and origin in scattering theory, give the key equations of scattering theory in a form that can by adapted to any convention, and show interrelations between these equations that can lead to confusion and error. We also give several diagnostic approaches for determining the conventions used in a particular source, and reference conventions adopted in widely used books on scattering theory.