Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics Conference Series

Quantum corrections to classical trajectories

A. Gersten, Amnon Moalem

Published Jul 1, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract A consistent formalism with quantum mechanics, different from Bohmian mechanics, which describes the quantum corrections to classical trajectories, is developed. The quantum potential of Bohmian mechanics is part of the kinetic energy in our formalism. The difficulties of the Bohmian mechanics formalism are pointed out.
DOI
10.1088/1742-6596/1956/1/012013

Related papers

Global existence and uniqueness of Bohmian trajectories

Karin Berndl

It is shown that Bohmian mechanics is internally consistent in the sense that the equations of motion typically have global solutions despite the fact that the velocity field is singular at the nodes of the wave function and at other points. This result is fundamental for the derivation of the quantum formalism. The role of the quantum flux is emphasized.

arXiv:quant-ph/9509009•Sep 18, 1995•0 citations

Basic elements of Bohmian mechanics

Emmanuel E. Haven, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Short introduction to Bohmian mechanics Sheldon Goldstein in a Foundations of Physics paper [1] indicates (p. 341): “Since macroscopic objects are normally regarded as built out of microscopic constituents …there can be no problem of macroscopic reality per se in Bohmian mechanics.” Goldstein in the same paper remarks (p. 342) that this | ψ | 2 has “a status very much the same as that of a thermodynamic equilibrium.” Basil Hiley the closest collaborator of David Bohm, says the following (Hiley [2] (p. 2)): “What Bohm (1952a; 1952b) did was to show how to retain a description of all the usual properties of a classical world and yet remain completely within the quantum formalism.” The Bohm (1952) [3] [4] references in that quote refer to the original work of Bohm in which he sets out the basics of the Bohmian mechanics. As we will see later in the next section of this chapter, the appearance of an “additional term” in the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, is the hallmark of Bohmian mechanics and it is very often termed the “quantum potential.” Hiley [2] (p. 2) remarks that since the Bohmian momentum is a well-defined function of position and time, an ensemble of trajectories can be found when the quantum potential is non-zero. A unique, classical path is found when the quantum potential is zero. From the outset, we hope the reader can savor the beauty of this simple but very powerful result. Bohmian mechanics indeed shows this very gentle transition from quantum mechanics to classical mechanics via the value of the quantum potential.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 17, 2013•0 citations

Developments of Bohmian Mechanics

James P. Finley

Bohmian mechanics is a deterministic theory of quantum mechanics that is based on a set of n velocity functions for n particles, where these functions depend on the wavefunction from the n-body time-dependent Schroedinger equation. It is well know that Bohmian mechanics is not applicable to stationary states, since the velocity field for stationary states is the zero function. Recently, an alternative to Bohmian mechanics has been formulated, based on a conservation of energy equation, where the velocity fields are not the zero function, but this formalism is only applicable to stationary states with real valued wavefunctions. In this paper, Bohmian mechanics is merged with the alternative to Bohmian mechanics. This is accomplished by introducing an interpretation of the Bohm quantum potential. The final formalism gives dynamic particles for all states, including stationary states. The final main working equation contains two kinetic energy terms and a term that contains a factor that can be interpreted as a pressure. The derivation is a simple n-body generalization of the recent generalization, or refinement, of the Madelung equations.

arXiv:2110.01143•Oct 4, 2021•1 citation

The Role of Trajectories in Quantum Chemistry and Chemical Physics

Ángel S. Sanz, Salvador Miret-Artés

This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the Bohmian formulation of quantummechanics. It starts with a historical review of the difficulties found by Louis de Broglie, David Bohm, and John S. Bell to convince the scientific community about the validity and utility of Bohmian mechanics. Then, a formal explanation of Bohmian mechanics for nonrelativistic, single-particle quantum systems is presented. The generalization to many-particle systems, where the exchange interaction and the spin play an important role, is also presented. After that, the measurement process in Bohmian mechanics is discussed. It is emphasized that Bohmian mechanics exactly reproduces the mean value and temporal and spatial correlations obtained from the standard, that is the Copenhagen or orthodox, formulation. The ontological characteristics of Bohmian mechanics provide a description of measurements as another type of interaction without the need for introducing the wave function collapse. Several solved problems are presented at the end of the chapter, giving additional mathematical support to some particular issues. A detailed description of computational algorithms to obtain Bohmian trajectories from the numerical solution of the Schro¨dinger or the Hamilton-Jacobi equations are presented in an appendix. The motivation of this chapter is twofold: first, as a didactic introduction to Bohmian formalism, which is used in the subsequent chapters, and second, as a self-contained summary for any newcomer interested in using Bohmian mechanics in his or her daily research activity.

Pan Stanford Publishing eBooks•Jun 4, 2012•1 citation

Overview of Bohmian Mechanics

Xavier Oriols, J. Mompart

This chapter provides a fully comprehensive overview of the Bohmian formulation of quantum phenomena. It deals with a historical review of the difficulties found by Louis de Broglie, David Bohm and John Bell to convince the scientific community about the validity and utility of Bohmian mechanics. The chapter presents a formal explanation of Bohmian mechanics for nonrelativistic single-particle quantum systems. It explains a didactic introduction of the Bohmian formalism and a self-contained summary for any newcomer interested in using Bohmian mechanics in their daily research activity. The quantum theory revolves around the notions of particles and waves. Einstein died in 1955, convinced that a correct reformulation of quantum theory would preserve local causality. Aerodynamics and hydrodynamics are examples of such continuous material systems. The initial formulation of quantum mechanics with Bohmian trajectories developed by de Broglie and Bohm was performed for dynamical systems with associated velocities much slower than the speed of light.

•May 24, 2019•6 citations

Bohmian Mechanics: Towards Illuminating The Quantum Potential

Matthew J. Brown

This thesis deals with the theoretical and experimental details of trying to understand \nand infer the quantum potential from Bohmian mechanics using Bohmian trajectories. In \nthis work, some of the key components of the history of Bohmian mechanics is given, a \ntheoretical explanation of how to measure the Bohmian potential, followed by an overview \nof the experimental apparatus and its components. Some tests of the experimental apparatus \nare then presented followed by a discussion of the results. Lastly, some interesting \nfollow up experiments are de ned and discussed. \n \nBohmian mechanics, while completely agreeing with quantum mechanics could not be \nmore di erent from the standard notions such as the fact that particles retain their classical \nidentity of a point like object that have de nite and causal trajectories. In this realm, rst \ndeveloped by de Broglie, these particles move and are guided by a wave, which turns out \nto be the wave function itself. Typically, the velocity of the particles anywhere in space \nis given by spatial derivatives of the phase of this wave and the energy content of the \nparticles is given by the temporal derivative. The trajectories can bend even when there \nare no outside (classical) forces that are acting on the objects. This is due to the fact that \nthese observations of Bohmian mechanics must conform to the standard measurements in \nquantum mechanics. \n \nOne detail that has gone unmeasured (in the sense of inference) in a laboratory setting, \nis the quantum potential (the mysterious force that moves particle to make sure they \nreproduce the measurements of quantum mechanics). Using the technique of measuring \nthe trajectories of photons, the question was asked, can the quantum potential for single \nphotons in the double slit be inferred? A setup has been built in order to try and answer this \nquestion using a single photon detecting camera and a heralding spontaneous parametric \ndown conversion source. Unfortunately, the quantum potential still goes unmeasured due \nto noise in the camera pictures destroying the integrity of the signal and an interesting \nproblem of trying to stitch together the quantum potential at the varying z-planes.

•Feb 20, 2018•1 citation
Short introduction to Bohmian mechanics Sheldon Goldstein in a Foundations of Physics paper [1] indicates (p. 341): “Since macroscopic objects are normally regarded as built out of microscopic constituents …there can be no problem of macroscopic reality per se in Bohmian mechanics.” Goldstein in the same paper remarks (p. 342) that this | ψ | 2 has “a status very much the same as that of a thermodynamic equilibrium.” Basil Hiley the closest collaborator of David Bohm, says the following (Hiley [2] (p. 2)): “What Bohm (1952a; 1952b) did was to show how to retain a description of all the usual properties of a classical world and yet remain completely within the quantum formalism.” The Bohm (1952) [3] [4] references in that quote refer to the original work of Bohm in which he sets out the basics of the Bohmian mechanics. As we will see later in the next section of this chapter, the appearance of an “additional term” in the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, is the hallmark of Bohmian mechanics and it is very often termed the “quantum potential.” Hiley [2] (p. 2) remarks that since the Bohmian momentum is a well-defined function of position and time, an ensemble of trajectories can be found when the quantum potential is non-zero. A unique, classical path is found when the quantum potential is zero. From the outset, we hope the reader can savor the beauty of this simple but very powerful result. Bohmian mechanics indeed shows this very gentle transition from quantum mechanics to classical mechanics via the value of the quantum potential.
Bohmian mechanics is a deterministic theory of quantum mechanics that is based on a set of n velocity functions for n particles, where these functions depend on the wavefunction from the n-body time-dependent Schroedinger equation. It is well know that Bohmian mechanics is not applicable to stationary states, since the velocity field for stationary states is the zero function. Recently, an alternative to Bohmian mechanics has been formulated, based on a conservation of energy equation, where the velocity fields are not the zero function, but this formalism is only applicable to stationary states with real valued wavefunctions. In this paper, Bohmian mechanics is merged with the alternative to Bohmian mechanics. This is accomplished by introducing an interpretation of the Bohm quantum potential. The final formalism gives dynamic particles for all states, including stationary states. The final main working equation contains two kinetic energy terms and a term that contains a factor that can be interpreted as a pressure. The derivation is a simple n-body generalization of the recent generalization, or refinement, of the Madelung equations.
This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the Bohmian formulation of quantummechanics. It starts with a historical review of the difficulties found by Louis de Broglie, David Bohm, and John S. Bell to convince the scientific community about the validity and utility of Bohmian mechanics. Then, a formal explanation of Bohmian mechanics for nonrelativistic, single-particle quantum systems is presented. The generalization to many-particle systems, where the exchange interaction and the spin play an important role, is also presented. After that, the measurement process in Bohmian mechanics is discussed. It is emphasized that Bohmian mechanics exactly reproduces the mean value and temporal and spatial correlations obtained from the standard, that is the Copenhagen or orthodox, formulation. The ontological characteristics of Bohmian mechanics provide a description of measurements as another type of interaction without the need for introducing the wave function collapse. Several solved problems are presented at the end of the chapter, giving additional mathematical support to some particular issues. A detailed description of computational algorithms to obtain Bohmian trajectories from the numerical solution of the Schro¨dinger or the Hamilton-Jacobi equations are presented in an appendix. The motivation of this chapter is twofold: first, as a didactic introduction to Bohmian formalism, which is used in the subsequent chapters, and second, as a self-contained summary for any newcomer interested in using Bohmian mechanics in his or her daily research activity.
This chapter provides a fully comprehensive overview of the Bohmian formulation of quantum phenomena. It deals with a historical review of the difficulties found by Louis de Broglie, David Bohm and John Bell to convince the scientific community about the validity and utility of Bohmian mechanics. The chapter presents a formal explanation of Bohmian mechanics for nonrelativistic single-particle quantum systems. It explains a didactic introduction of the Bohmian formalism and a self-contained summary for any newcomer interested in using Bohmian mechanics in their daily research activity. The quantum theory revolves around the notions of particles and waves. Einstein died in 1955, convinced that a correct reformulation of quantum theory would preserve local causality. Aerodynamics and hydrodynamics are examples of such continuous material systems. The initial formulation of quantum mechanics with Bohmian trajectories developed by de Broglie and Bohm was performed for dynamical systems with associated velocities much slower than the speed of light.
This thesis deals with the theoretical and experimental details of trying to understand \nand infer the quantum potential from Bohmian mechanics using Bohmian trajectories. In \nthis work, some of the key components of the history of Bohmian mechanics is given, a \ntheoretical explanation of how to measure the Bohmian potential, followed by an overview \nof the experimental apparatus and its components. Some tests of the experimental apparatus \nare then presented followed by a discussion of the results. Lastly, some interesting \nfollow up experiments are de ned and discussed. \n \nBohmian mechanics, while completely agreeing with quantum mechanics could not be \nmore di erent from the standard notions such as the fact that particles retain their classical \nidentity of a point like object that have de nite and causal trajectories. In this realm, rst \ndeveloped by de Broglie, these particles move and are guided by a wave, which turns out \nto be the wave function itself. Typically, the velocity of the particles anywhere in space \nis given by spatial derivatives of the phase of this wave and the energy content of the \nparticles is given by the temporal derivative. The trajectories can bend even when there \nare no outside (classical) forces that are acting on the objects. This is due to the fact that \nthese observations of Bohmian mechanics must conform to the standard measurements in \nquantum mechanics. \n \nOne detail that has gone unmeasured (in the sense of inference) in a laboratory setting, \nis the quantum potential (the mysterious force that moves particle to make sure they \nreproduce the measurements of quantum mechanics). Using the technique of measuring \nthe trajectories of photons, the question was asked, can the quantum potential for single \nphotons in the double slit be inferred? A setup has been built in order to try and answer this \nquestion using a single photon detecting camera and a heralding spontaneous parametric \ndown conversion source. Unfortunately, the quantum potential still goes unmeasured due \nto noise in the camera pictures destroying the integrity of the signal and an interesting \nproblem of trying to stitch together the quantum potential at the varying z-planes.