Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics

The Quantum Mechanical Harmonic Oscillator in the Phase Representation and the Uncertainty Relation Between the Number of Quanta and the Phase

V. M. Faǐn

Published Dec 1, 1967• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

QUANTUM HARMONIC OSCILLATOR IN THE PHASE REPRESENTATION AND THE UNCERTAINTY RELATION BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF QUANTA AND PHASE.

V. M. Faǐn

•Jan 1, 1967•3 citations

Generalized Uncertainty Relations: Theory, Examples, and Lorentz Invariance

Samuel L. Braunstein, Carlton M. Caves, Gerard J Milburn

The quantum-mechanical framework in which observables are associated with Hermitian operators is too narrow to discuss measurements of such important physical quantities as elapsed time or harmonic-oscillator phase. We introduce a broader framework that allows us to derive quantum-mechanical limits on the precision to which a parameter---e.g., elapsed time---may be determined via arbitrary data analysis of arbitrary measurements on N identically prepared quantum systems. The limits are expressed as generalized Mandelstam-Tamm uncertainty relations, which involve the operator that generates displacements of the parameter---e.g., the Hamiltonian operator in the case of elapsed time. This approach avoids entirely the problem of associating a Hermitian operator with the parameter. We illustrate the general formalism, first, with nonrelativistic uncertainty relations for spatial displacement and momentum, harmonic-oscillator phase and number of quanta, and time and energy and, second, with Lorentz-invariant uncertainty relations involving the displacement and Lorentz-rotation parameters of the Poincar\\'e group.

•Jul 7, 1995•331 citations

Covariant phase-space representation for harmonic oscillators

Y. S. Kim, Eugene Paul Wigner

It is shown that, in the phase-space representation of quantum mechanics, the uncertainty relation can be stated in terms of the integral invariant of Poincar\'e. The uncertainty relation for spreading free wave packets is discussed as an illustrative example. This phase-space approach can be extended to the relativistic regime. It is shown that Lorentz boosts are area-preserving canonical transformations in the phase space of the light-cone variables. The harmonic oscillator is discussed in detail as an illustrative example for the covariant realization of the uncertainty principle.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1988•38 citations

Phase of the quantum harmonic oscillator

R. Shepard Scott

Massachusetts Institute of Technology eBooks•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Elliptic eigenstates for the quantum harmonic oscillator

J Pollett, O. Méplan, Claude Gignoux

A new family of stationary coherent states for the two-dimensional harmonic oscillator is presented. These states are coherent in the sense that they minimize an uncertainty relation for observables related to the orientation and the eccentricity of an ellipse. The wavefunction of these states is particularly simple and well localized on the corresponding classical elliptical trajectory. As the number of quanta increases, the localization on the classical invariant structure is more pronounced. These coherent states give a useful tool to compare classical and quantum mechanics and form a convenient basis to study weak perturbations.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Dec 21, 1995•28 citations

Quantum Mechanics of the Harmonic Oscillator

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Mar 1, 2006•1 citation
The quantum-mechanical framework in which observables are associated with Hermitian operators is too narrow to discuss measurements of such important physical quantities as elapsed time or harmonic-oscillator phase. We introduce a broader framework that allows us to derive quantum-mechanical limits on the precision to which a parameter---e.g., elapsed time---may be determined via arbitrary data analysis of arbitrary measurements on N identically prepared quantum systems. The limits are expressed as generalized Mandelstam-Tamm uncertainty relations, which involve the operator that generates displacements of the parameter---e.g., the Hamiltonian operator in the case of elapsed time. This approach avoids entirely the problem of associating a Hermitian operator with the parameter. We illustrate the general formalism, first, with nonrelativistic uncertainty relations for spatial displacement and momentum, harmonic-oscillator phase and number of quanta, and time and energy and, second, with Lorentz-invariant uncertainty relations involving the displacement and Lorentz-rotation parameters of the Poincar\\'e group.
It is shown that, in the phase-space representation of quantum mechanics, the uncertainty relation can be stated in terms of the integral invariant of Poincar\'e. The uncertainty relation for spreading free wave packets is discussed as an illustrative example. This phase-space approach can be extended to the relativistic regime. It is shown that Lorentz boosts are area-preserving canonical transformations in the phase space of the light-cone variables. The harmonic oscillator is discussed in detail as an illustrative example for the covariant realization of the uncertainty principle.
A new family of stationary coherent states for the two-dimensional harmonic oscillator is presented. These states are coherent in the sense that they minimize an uncertainty relation for observables related to the orientation and the eccentricity of an ellipse. The wavefunction of these states is particularly simple and well localized on the corresponding classical elliptical trajectory. As the number of quanta increases, the localization on the classical invariant structure is more pronounced. These coherent states give a useful tool to compare classical and quantum mechanics and form a convenient basis to study weak perturbations.