Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks

The Empirical Basis of Quantum Mechanics

Tilak Sinha

Published Jun 18, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

From this chapter we start our exposition of quantum mechanics. First, we lay down the typical setting of a quantum mechanical problem. The fundamental feature of quantum indeterminism and the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics is emphasized. We proceed by constructing, from the single notion of measurement, all the essential conceptual ingredients of quantum mechanics (i.e., the concepts of observable, state and system). Then we formulate the target questions that quantum mechanics aims to solve. Next, we proceed to state the specific laws that constitute the logical premise of the subject. Finally, we demonstrate how the laws, most dominantly, the superposition principle (the fact that quantum probabilities interfere) provides an improved recipe for obtaining the answers to the target questions of quantum mechanics. This also leads to a more refined definition of the quantum state. In order to be able to quickly introduce the basic framework of quantum mechanics, we restrict the discussion to a simple scenario of “instantaneously subsequent measurements” (where there is no time evolution), and where states can be prepared by a single measurement (in the standard jargon, this would be called, “quantum mechanics without degeneracy”; these are descriptions involving CSCOs comprising just one observable).

DOI
10.1201/9781003090335-2

Related papers

Quantum mechanics

Mark E. Tuckerman

Abstract Chapter 9 begins laying a foundation for quantum statistical mechanics with a discussion of relevant topics in quantum mechanics. The fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics are reviewed, beginning with the definition of a quantum state and the introduction of the concept of a state vector in a Hilbert space. The representation of observables as Hermitian operators on Hilbert space vectors is described; it is shown that the eigenvalues of Hermitian operators are real and, therefore, constitute possible outcomes of measurements made on these observables. The notions compatible and non-compatible observables and implication for the measurement problem are presented. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is introduced as generating the time-evolution of the state vector, and it is shown how to cast the Schrödinger equation into a coordinate basis to yield the wave equation of quantum mechanics. Coordinate and momentum bases and their properties are desribed. Several analytically solvable quantum systems are presented as illustrative examples. The chapter concludes with a discussion of spin and the treatment identical particles

•Aug 1, 2023•0 citations

An Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

Tilak Sinha

The core content of even the most intricate intellectual edifices is often a simple fact or idea. So is it with quantum mechanics; the entire mathematical fabric of the formal description of quantum mechanics stems essentially from the fact that quantum probabilities interfere (i.e., from the superposition principle). This book is dedicated to substantiating this claim. In the process, the book tries to demonstrate how the factual content of quantum mechanics can be transcribed in the formal language of vector spaces and linear transformations by disentangling the empirical content from the usual formal description. More importantly, it tries to bring out what this transcription achieves. The book uses a pedagogic strategy which reverse engineers the postulates of quantum mechanics to device a schematic outline of the empirical content of quantum mechanics from which the postulates are then reconstructed step by step. This strategy is adopted to avoid the disconcerting details of actual experiments (however simplified) to spare the beginner of issues that lurk in the fragile foundations of the subject. In the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the key idea is measurement. But "measurement" carries an entirely different meaning from the connotation that the term carries elsewhere in physics. This book strives to underline this as strongly as possible. The book is intended as an undergraduate text for a first course in quantum mechanics. Since the book is self contained, it may also be used by enthusiastic outsiders interested to get a glimpse of the core content of the subject. Features: Demonstrates why linear algebra is the appropriate mathematical language for quantum mechanics. Uses a reconstructive approach to motivate the postulates of quantum mechanics. Builds the vocabulary of quantum mechanics by showing how the entire body of its conceptual ingredients can be constructed from the single notion of quantum measurement.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Jun 18, 2021•0 citations

Lectures 1, 2, 3, & 4: Comprehensive Review of Graduate Quantum Physics I & II

Travis S. Taylor

Quantum Mechanics fundamentally redefines how we understand and predict physical phenomena at the microscopic level, diverging significantly from classical physics. This chapter introduces the core principles and mathematical tools that form the basis of quantum theory, emphasizing wave-particle duality, the quantum state concept, and the mechanism of wave function collapse. These concepts challenge traditional notions of determinism and locality, replacing them with probabilistic outcomes and non-local interactions. Understanding these principles is crucial for any advanced study in physics, chemistry, and related fields, as they lay the groundwork for exploring more complex quantum phenomena discussed in subsequent chapters.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 21, 2025•0 citations

The Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Jeffrey Alan Barrett

Abstract The book starts with a description of classical mechanics then discusses the quantum phenomena that require us to give up our commonsense classical intuitions. We consider the physical and conceptual arguments that led to the standard von Neumann-Dirac formulation of quantum mechanics and how the standard theory explains quantum phenomena. This includes a discussion of how the theory’s two dynamical laws work with the standard interpretation of states to explain determinate measurement records, quantum statistics, interference effects, entanglement, decoherence, and quantum nonlocality. A careful understanding of how the standard theory works ultimately leads to the quantum measurement problem. We consider how the measurement problem threatens the logical consistency of the standard theory then turn to a discussion of the main proposals for resolving it. This includes collapse formulations of quantum mechanics like Wigner’s extension of the standard theory and the GRW approach and no-collapse formulations like pure wave mechanics, the various many-worlds theories, and Bohmian mechanics. In discussing alternative formulations of quantum mechanics we pay particular attention to the explanatory role played by each theory’s empirical ontology and associated metaphysical commitments and the conceptual trade-offs between theoretical options.

•Dec 26, 2019•57 citations

Measurement in Quantum Mechanics: Decoherence and the Pointer Basis

Anu Venugopalan

Quantum Mechanics represents one of the greatest triumphs of the scientific enterprise of the twentieth century. The stunning success of quantum theory has led to many revolutionary inventions and its extraordinary concepts describe the heart of several important real world applications like transistors and lasers. The theory makes accurate predictions about a wide range of physical phenomena and has historically withstood the tests and scrutiny of every experimental investigation. However, inspite of the fact that quantum theory is widely regarded by the scientific establishment as the fundamental theory of nature and is immensly successful and useful, its conceptual framework makes many predictions which are difficult to comprehend “classically. The theory is, pardoxically, powerful and confusing at the same time. Quantum theory’s unusual predictions originate from its basic formailsm which involves concepts like probability amplitudes and the linear superposition principle(Dirac, 1947). The quantum view appears abstract and counterintuitive and at odds with classical perceptions. Many of the conceptual problems of quantum mechanics are encompassed in what is known as the quantum measurement problem(Peres, 1986; von Neumann, 1932; Wheeler & Zurek, 1983). Conventionally, the measurement paradox is supposedly ’resolved’ by forcing a notion of a sudden collapse of the state vector of the system being measured. However, the nature of this mechanism is at odds with the basic tenets of quantum mechanics and hence may lie outside its realm thus questioning the validity of the theory it self. Closely related with the problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is the question of its connection with the emergence of classicality and the elusive boundary between quantum and classical worlds. What is the connection between the ‘classical’ and the ‘quantum’ worlds? Is there a definite relationship? Are classical mechanics and quantum mechanics two mutually exclusive incompatible theories or are they two aspects of the same underlying philosophy? Classical objects are eventually composed of elements of the microworld which can be described quantum mechanically. So, how and where can there be a boundary between the two worlds? In the following section we begin by introducing the quantum measurement problem. In the next section we will discuss attempts to understand and explain away the underlying paradoxes in quantum theory as highlighted in the quantum measurement problem and the question of the quantum-classical connection. From among the various explanations that seek a resolution to the conceptual problems of quantum mechanics, we focus on the ‘environment induced decoherence theory’ an approach that employs the methods developed by several authors to analyse the quantum mechanics of Measurement in Quantum Mechanics: Decoherence and the Pointer Basis

InTech eBooks•Feb 22, 2012•2 citations

Imprecise Measurements and Degeneracy

Tilak Sinha

From here, we start relaxing the constraints that we had imposed in the earlier chapters for simplicity, and start moving towards more general scenarios. First, measurements with inadequate resolution, employing insufficiently selective measurement devices have been introduced. In this book they have been termed imprecise measurements. Here, we admit for the first time that all measurements do not prepare quantum states. We argue how the description of imprecise observables requires the use of Hermitian operators with degenerate eigenvalues: degeneracy encodes insufficient selectiveness. The general law of state preparation, the standard jargon for which is “collapse postulate”, is described in its full glory here. We then move on to introduce the idea of compatibility of observables and demonstrate how certain groups of imprecise measurements can collaborate to prepare states. This leads to the important idea of “complete set of compatible observables” and the related concepts of “complete and incomplete measurements”. Subsequently, the association of compatible observables and commuting operators is established which also connects complete set of compatible observables and complete set of commuting operators (both of which are accronymed CSCO, without ambiguity). We also give an explicit illustration of the algebraic construction of a CSCO.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Jun 18, 2021•0 citations
From this chapter we start our exposition of quantum mechanics. First, we lay down the typical setting of a quantum mechanical problem. The fundamental feature of quantum indeterminism and the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics is emphasized. We proceed by constructing, from the single notion of measurement, all the essential conceptual ingredients of quantum mechanics (i.e., the concepts of observable, state and system). Then we formulate the target questions that quantum mechanics aims to solve. Next, we proceed to state the specific laws that constitute the logical premise of the subject. Finally, we demonstrate how the laws, most dominantly, the superposition principle (the fact that quantum probabilities interfere) provides an improved recipe for obtaining the answers to the target questions of quantum mechanics. This also leads to a more refined definition of the quantum state. In order to be able to quickly introduce the basic framework of quantum mechanics, we restrict the discussion to a simple scenario of “instantaneously subsequent measurements” (where there is no time evolution), and where states can be prepared by a single measurement (in the standard jargon, this would be called, “quantum mechanics without degeneracy”; these are descriptions involving CSCOs comprising just one observable).
Abstract Chapter 9 begins laying a foundation for quantum statistical mechanics with a discussion of relevant topics in quantum mechanics. The fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics are reviewed, beginning with the definition of a quantum state and the introduction of the concept of a state vector in a Hilbert space. The representation of observables as Hermitian operators on Hilbert space vectors is described; it is shown that the eigenvalues of Hermitian operators are real and, therefore, constitute possible outcomes of measurements made on these observables. The notions compatible and non-compatible observables and implication for the measurement problem are presented. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is introduced as generating the time-evolution of the state vector, and it is shown how to cast the Schrödinger equation into a coordinate basis to yield the wave equation of quantum mechanics. Coordinate and momentum bases and their properties are desribed. Several analytically solvable quantum systems are presented as illustrative examples. The chapter concludes with a discussion of spin and the treatment identical particles
The core content of even the most intricate intellectual edifices is often a simple fact or idea. So is it with quantum mechanics; the entire mathematical fabric of the formal description of quantum mechanics stems essentially from the fact that quantum probabilities interfere (i.e., from the superposition principle). This book is dedicated to substantiating this claim. In the process, the book tries to demonstrate how the factual content of quantum mechanics can be transcribed in the formal language of vector spaces and linear transformations by disentangling the empirical content from the usual formal description. More importantly, it tries to bring out what this transcription achieves. The book uses a pedagogic strategy which reverse engineers the postulates of quantum mechanics to device a schematic outline of the empirical content of quantum mechanics from which the postulates are then reconstructed step by step. This strategy is adopted to avoid the disconcerting details of actual experiments (however simplified) to spare the beginner of issues that lurk in the fragile foundations of the subject. In the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the key idea is measurement. But "measurement" carries an entirely different meaning from the connotation that the term carries elsewhere in physics. This book strives to underline this as strongly as possible. The book is intended as an undergraduate text for a first course in quantum mechanics. Since the book is self contained, it may also be used by enthusiastic outsiders interested to get a glimpse of the core content of the subject. Features: Demonstrates why linear algebra is the appropriate mathematical language for quantum mechanics. Uses a reconstructive approach to motivate the postulates of quantum mechanics. Builds the vocabulary of quantum mechanics by showing how the entire body of its conceptual ingredients can be constructed from the single notion of quantum measurement.
Quantum Mechanics fundamentally redefines how we understand and predict physical phenomena at the microscopic level, diverging significantly from classical physics. This chapter introduces the core principles and mathematical tools that form the basis of quantum theory, emphasizing wave-particle duality, the quantum state concept, and the mechanism of wave function collapse. These concepts challenge traditional notions of determinism and locality, replacing them with probabilistic outcomes and non-local interactions. Understanding these principles is crucial for any advanced study in physics, chemistry, and related fields, as they lay the groundwork for exploring more complex quantum phenomena discussed in subsequent chapters.
Abstract The book starts with a description of classical mechanics then discusses the quantum phenomena that require us to give up our commonsense classical intuitions. We consider the physical and conceptual arguments that led to the standard von Neumann-Dirac formulation of quantum mechanics and how the standard theory explains quantum phenomena. This includes a discussion of how the theory’s two dynamical laws work with the standard interpretation of states to explain determinate measurement records, quantum statistics, interference effects, entanglement, decoherence, and quantum nonlocality. A careful understanding of how the standard theory works ultimately leads to the quantum measurement problem. We consider how the measurement problem threatens the logical consistency of the standard theory then turn to a discussion of the main proposals for resolving it. This includes collapse formulations of quantum mechanics like Wigner’s extension of the standard theory and the GRW approach and no-collapse formulations like pure wave mechanics, the various many-worlds theories, and Bohmian mechanics. In discussing alternative formulations of quantum mechanics we pay particular attention to the explanatory role played by each theory’s empirical ontology and associated metaphysical commitments and the conceptual trade-offs between theoretical options.
Quantum Mechanics represents one of the greatest triumphs of the scientific enterprise of the twentieth century. The stunning success of quantum theory has led to many revolutionary inventions and its extraordinary concepts describe the heart of several important real world applications like transistors and lasers. The theory makes accurate predictions about a wide range of physical phenomena and has historically withstood the tests and scrutiny of every experimental investigation. However, inspite of the fact that quantum theory is widely regarded by the scientific establishment as the fundamental theory of nature and is immensly successful and useful, its conceptual framework makes many predictions which are difficult to comprehend “classically. The theory is, pardoxically, powerful and confusing at the same time. Quantum theory’s unusual predictions originate from its basic formailsm which involves concepts like probability amplitudes and the linear superposition principle(Dirac, 1947). The quantum view appears abstract and counterintuitive and at odds with classical perceptions. Many of the conceptual problems of quantum mechanics are encompassed in what is known as the quantum measurement problem(Peres, 1986; von Neumann, 1932; Wheeler & Zurek, 1983). Conventionally, the measurement paradox is supposedly ’resolved’ by forcing a notion of a sudden collapse of the state vector of the system being measured. However, the nature of this mechanism is at odds with the basic tenets of quantum mechanics and hence may lie outside its realm thus questioning the validity of the theory it self. Closely related with the problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is the question of its connection with the emergence of classicality and the elusive boundary between quantum and classical worlds. What is the connection between the ‘classical’ and the ‘quantum’ worlds? Is there a definite relationship? Are classical mechanics and quantum mechanics two mutually exclusive incompatible theories or are they two aspects of the same underlying philosophy? Classical objects are eventually composed of elements of the microworld which can be described quantum mechanically. So, how and where can there be a boundary between the two worlds? In the following section we begin by introducing the quantum measurement problem. In the next section we will discuss attempts to understand and explain away the underlying paradoxes in quantum theory as highlighted in the quantum measurement problem and the question of the quantum-classical connection. From among the various explanations that seek a resolution to the conceptual problems of quantum mechanics, we focus on the ‘environment induced decoherence theory’ an approach that employs the methods developed by several authors to analyse the quantum mechanics of Measurement in Quantum Mechanics: Decoherence and the Pointer Basis
From here, we start relaxing the constraints that we had imposed in the earlier chapters for simplicity, and start moving towards more general scenarios. First, measurements with inadequate resolution, employing insufficiently selective measurement devices have been introduced. In this book they have been termed imprecise measurements. Here, we admit for the first time that all measurements do not prepare quantum states. We argue how the description of imprecise observables requires the use of Hermitian operators with degenerate eigenvalues: degeneracy encodes insufficient selectiveness. The general law of state preparation, the standard jargon for which is “collapse postulate”, is described in its full glory here. We then move on to introduce the idea of compatibility of observables and demonstrate how certain groups of imprecise measurements can collaborate to prepare states. This leads to the important idea of “complete set of compatible observables” and the related concepts of “complete and incomplete measurements”. Subsequently, the association of compatible observables and commuting operators is established which also connects complete set of compatible observables and complete set of commuting operators (both of which are accronymed CSCO, without ambiguity). We also give an explicit illustration of the algebraic construction of a CSCO.