Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Understanding and mitigating decoherence in fluxonium qubits – Energy relaxation

Hantao Sun, Feng Wu, Hsiang‐Sheng Ku, Hao Deng, Dawei Ding, Ran Gao, Xun Gao, Jiang Xun, Zhisheng Li, Xiaotong Ni, Jin Qin, Zhijun Song, Chengchun Tang, Tenghui Wang, Wenlong Yu, Tian Xia, Gengyan Zhang, Xiaohang Zhang, Jingwei Zhou, Xing Zhu, Additional Contributing Aql Members, Yaoyun Shi, Jianxin Chen, Hui‐Hai Zhao, Chunqing Deng

Published Mar 17, 2021• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Understanding and mitigating decoherence in fluxonium qubits – Dephasing

Gengyan Zhang, Hantao Sun, Hao Deng +22 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 17, 2021•0 citations

Relaxation mechanisms of the fluxonium qubit

Nicholas A. Masluk, Archana Kamal, Vladimir Manucharyan +3 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 25, 2011•0 citations

Decoherence mechanisms in a fluxonium qubit

Long B. Nguyen, Yen‐Hsiang Lin, Nicholas Grabon +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2017•0 citations

Numerical Modeling of Quasiparticle-Induced Dissipation in Fluxonium Qubits

Kate Azar, Max Hays, Kyle Serniak

Nonequilibrium quasiparticles (QPs) generated by stray infrared and ionizing radiation can limit the performance of superconducting quantum processors and present challenges for quantum error correction schemes. Models of QP-induced energy relaxation commonly assume that the characteristic energy of the QPs and the qubit transition energy are both small relative to the superconducting gap. Under these assumptions, certain qubits such as the fluxonium would exhibit protection against QP-induced dissipation at specific bias points. Here, we show that this is not necessarily the case, numerically analyzing the predicted rate of QP-induced dissipation in fluxonium qubits for different QP energy distributions and for QPs created via photon-assisted tunneling processes. We find that accounting for small numerical factors, existing theoretical models predict sensitivity to QP-induced errors at bias points previously thought to be protected. We find that inclusion of asymmetry in the superconducting gap energy across the junction can reintroduce suppression of QP-induced relaxation, as expected. Additionally, for QPs created by photon-assisted tunneling, we predict that $T_1$ protection will only occur for a specific energy of pair-breaking radiation. This understanding of fluxonium sensitivity to QP-induced dissipation informs the development of fluxonium-based processors and future QP-mitigation strategies.

quant-pharXiv:2607.24946•Jul 29, 2026•0 citations

Spectroscopy and decoherence of plasmons and fluxons in superconducting fluxonium qubit

Long B. Nguyen, Yen‐Hsiang Lin, Nicholas Grabon +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 17, 2016•0 citations

Quasiparticle Poisoning of Superconducting Fluxonium Qubits

Kesavan Manivannan

Superconducting qubits based on Josephson junctions have emerged as a leading hardware platform in the quest to realize large-scale quantum computers. However, qubit decoherence remains a major hurdle on the path toward fault-tolerant quantum computing. In particular, excess quasiparticle (QP) excitations constitute a significant source of dissipation in superconducting quantum devices. The empirically observed QP density in these systems is orders of magnitude larger than that predicted by Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory. Moreover, QP poisoning due to high-energy particle impacts can cause correlated errors that simultaneously affect multiple qubits, thereby impeding quantum error correction. Although QP-induced decoherence has been extensively studied in widely implemented transmon qubits, its impact on fluxonium qubits, a leading alternative architecture, remains far less explored. In this thesis, we investigate energy relaxation in fluxonium qubits induced by controlled QP poisoning using an on-chip Josephson injector junction that generates Cooper-pair-breaking phonons and photons. We separately measure the relaxation and excitation rates, instead of the conventional energy relaxation time. For specific injection parameters, we observe an apparent reversal of the rates, with the excitation rate exceeding the relaxation rate. We further measure the rates as a function of external flux to disentangle the effects of QP tunneling across the small junction and the junction array superinductor. Across all measured samples, differing in qubit spectra and injection conditions, we infer roughly an order of magnitude higher QP density at the small junction than in the array junctions. Our findings advance the understanding of QP-induced decoherence in fluxonium qubits and provide insight for reconciling discrepancies in reported bounds on QP densities, potentially enabling the development of QP mitigation strategies tailored to fluxonium qubits.

•May 10, 2026•0 citations
Nonequilibrium quasiparticles (QPs) generated by stray infrared and ionizing radiation can limit the performance of superconducting quantum processors and present challenges for quantum error correction schemes. Models of QP-induced energy relaxation commonly assume that the characteristic energy of the QPs and the qubit transition energy are both small relative to the superconducting gap. Under these assumptions, certain qubits such as the fluxonium would exhibit protection against QP-induced dissipation at specific bias points. Here, we show that this is not necessarily the case, numerically analyzing the predicted rate of QP-induced dissipation in fluxonium qubits for different QP energy distributions and for QPs created via photon-assisted tunneling processes. We find that accounting for small numerical factors, existing theoretical models predict sensitivity to QP-induced errors at bias points previously thought to be protected. We find that inclusion of asymmetry in the superconducting gap energy across the junction can reintroduce suppression of QP-induced relaxation, as expected. Additionally, for QPs created by photon-assisted tunneling, we predict that T1T_1T1​ protection will only occur for a specific energy of pair-breaking radiation. This understanding of fluxonium sensitivity to QP-induced dissipation informs the development of fluxonium-based processors and future QP-mitigation strategies.
Superconducting qubits based on Josephson junctions have emerged as a leading hardware platform in the quest to realize large-scale quantum computers. However, qubit decoherence remains a major hurdle on the path toward fault-tolerant quantum computing. In particular, excess quasiparticle (QP) excitations constitute a significant source of dissipation in superconducting quantum devices. The empirically observed QP density in these systems is orders of magnitude larger than that predicted by Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory. Moreover, QP poisoning due to high-energy particle impacts can cause correlated errors that simultaneously affect multiple qubits, thereby impeding quantum error correction. Although QP-induced decoherence has been extensively studied in widely implemented transmon qubits, its impact on fluxonium qubits, a leading alternative architecture, remains far less explored. In this thesis, we investigate energy relaxation in fluxonium qubits induced by controlled QP poisoning using an on-chip Josephson injector junction that generates Cooper-pair-breaking phonons and photons. We separately measure the relaxation and excitation rates, instead of the conventional energy relaxation time. For specific injection parameters, we observe an apparent reversal of the rates, with the excitation rate exceeding the relaxation rate. We further measure the rates as a function of external flux to disentangle the effects of QP tunneling across the small junction and the junction array superinductor. Across all measured samples, differing in qubit spectra and injection conditions, we infer roughly an order of magnitude higher QP density at the small junction than in the array junctions. Our findings advance the understanding of QP-induced decoherence in fluxonium qubits and provide insight for reconciling discrepancies in reported bounds on QP densities, potentially enabling the development of QP mitigation strategies tailored to fluxonium qubits.