Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics and Philosophy II

Luka Boršić, Dragan Poljak, Ivana Skuhala Karasman, Franjo Sokolić

Published Jan 1, 2020• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Physics and Philosophy

James A. McWilliams, George M. Buckley

•Jan 1, 1948•1 citation

Some Trends in the Philosophy of Physics

Henrik Zinkernagel

A short review of some recent developments in the philosophy of physics is presented. I focus on themes which illustrate relations and points of common interest between philosophy of physics and three of its `neighboring' elds: Physics, metaphysics and general philosophy of science. The main examples discussed in these three `border areas' are (i) decoherence and the interpretation of quantum mechanics; (ii) time in physics and metaphysics; and (iii)methodological issues surrounding the multiverse idea in modern cosmology.

THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science•May 19, 2011•21 citations

Approach to Physical Reality: A Note on Poincare Group & the Philosophy of Nagarjuna

Michele Caponigro

We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincar\'{e} group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract the completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?

Prespacetime journal•Nov 18, 2017•0 citations

Physics and Philosophy

Nature•Feb 1, 1956•8 citations

Physics and Philosophy

Luka Boršić, Ivana Skuhala Karasman, Franjo Sokolić

•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Approach to Physical Reality: a note on Poincare Group and the philosophy of Nagarjuna

David Vernette, Punam Tandan, Michele Caponigro

We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincare group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?

arXiv:0704.1665•Apr 13, 2007•1 citation
A short review of some recent developments in the philosophy of physics is presented. I focus on themes which illustrate relations and points of common interest between philosophy of physics and three of its `neighboring' elds: Physics, metaphysics and general philosophy of science. The main examples discussed in these three `border areas' are (i) decoherence and the interpretation of quantum mechanics; (ii) time in physics and metaphysics; and (iii)methodological issues surrounding the multiverse idea in modern cosmology.
We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincar\'{e} group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract the completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?
We argue about a possible scenario of physical reality based on the parallelism between Poincare group and the sunyata philosophy of Nagarjuna. The notion of "relational" is the common denominator of two views. We have approached the relational concept in third-person perspective (ontic level). It is possible to deduce different physical consequence and interpretation through first-person perspective approach. This relational interpretation leave open the questions: i)we must abandon the idea for a physical system the possibility to extract completeness information? ii)we must abandon the idea to infer a possible structure of physical reality?