The development of solid-state quantum technologies requires the understanding of quantum measurements in interacting, nonisolated quantum systems.In general, a permanent coupling of detectors to a quantum system leads to memory effects that have to be taken into account in interpreting the measurement results.In this thesis we develop a microscopic framework for correlations in non-Markovian weak measurements.A special point of interest are the different orders of quantum mechanical operators that appear naturally in such a scheme.First, we analyze a generic setup of two detectors coupled to a quantum system and derive a compact formula in the weak-measurement limit that interpolates between an instantaneous (text-book type) and almost continuous -detector dynamics-dependent -measurement.A quantum memory effect that we term system-mediated detector-detector interaction is crucial to observe noncommuting observables simultaneously.A response function of the observed system variables introduces an antisymmetric operator order to the total result.We propose a mesoscopic double-dot detector setup in which the memory effect is tunable and that can be used to explore the transition to non-Markovian quantum measurements experimentally.The response and noise functions which we find to describe the system-mediated detector-detector interaction are analyzed in detail.They are compared to the phenomenological "equilibrium order" approach for non-Markovian measurements which was introduced in Ref. [1].We give an overview of the broad spectrum of results beyond "equilibrium order" in the microscopic model in a compendium of different detectors and discuss general mathematical properties of the detector functions.As the quantum measurement problem is not banned from our theory by operation in the weak measurement limit, but deferred from the system of interest to the detectors, we comment on the influence of the detector readout procedure on the results.Finally, we combine the phenomenological proposal for nonsymmetrized correlations in quantum noninvasive measurements [1] and our microscopic derivation of the systemmediated detector-detector interaction of second order to investigate higher-order correlations of non-Markovian weak quantum measurements.The general third-order correlator is introduced and the underlying physical processes are identified and discussed.We find a more complex behavior than in second-order correlations with four types of system operator orders which we denote third cumulant, noise susceptibility I and II and second-order susceptibility.We introduce a convenient diagrammatic description which we illustrate by an example of measuring the third-order correlations of the tunnel current through a barrier.v I would like to express my deep gratitude to all the people who contributed to this thesis.Special thanks to my supervisor Wolfgang Belzig for offering me the opportunity to work in his research group, for the numerous helpful discussions in which I learned a lot and which gave impetus to this work again and again, for being always patient and an excellent guidance during my studies.I also wish to express great thanks to my other collaborators, Adam Bednorz, whose ideas are an important part of the foundation of this work and who was always ready to comment new results and bring things forward, and Christoph Bruder, who was a great help in thinking through results and formulating them in an understandable manner while preparing parts of this work for publication.Many thanks to Maxim Trushin, who was willing to discuss our weak measurement formalism with the example of a graphene coherence measurement, and who contributed the initial idea of a optical detection of pseudospin superposition states as well as the description of the carrier statistics using the Liouville-von Neumann equation and very important parts of the discussion of the results.In this context I also want to acknowledge valuable discussions with Daniele Brida about the optical detection scheme and with Bertrand Reulet about third-order current correlations.Finally, I wish to thank the current and former members of the Quantum Transport Group
In quantum mechanics, conservation laws are usually understood only statistically and only in the context of unitary evolution: during such evolution, if an observable commutes with the Hamiltonian, its expectation value and Born-rule probability distribution remain unchanged. Individual measurement outcomes, however, disrupt even this weak form of statistical conservation. Recently, though, it has been argued that a stronger, non-statistical form of conservation, valid at the level of individual measurement outcomes, can be recovered. The proposal relies on the claim that any superposition of eigenstates of a conserved quantity must ultimately be prepared relative to another physical system, which serves as the relevant reference frame and remains correlated with the system being prepared. On this enlarged description, the change observed in the measured system is claimed to be exactly compensated by an opposite change in the preparer, thereby restoring conservation at the level of individual measurement outcomes. We analyze this proposal and argue that it faces significant conceptual difficulties. We show that the proposed mechanism is not adequately justified and, moreover, does not establish conservation in individual measurement outcomes as claimed.
Conservation principles are essential to describe and quantify dynamical processes in all areas of physics.Classically, a conservation law holds because the description of reality can be considered independent of an observation (measurement).In quantum mechanics, however, invasive observations change quantities drastically, irrespective of any classical conservation law.One may hope to overcome this nonconservation by performing a weak, almost noninvasive measurement.Interestingly, we find that the nonconservation is manifest even in weakly measured correlations if some of the other observables do not commute with the conserved quantity.Our observations show that conservation laws in quantum mechanics should be considered in their specific measurement context.We provide experimentally feasible examples to observe the apparent nonconservation of energy and angular momentum.
We study theoretically a weak measurement of an observable
A and its impact on a subsequent strong measurement of another observable
B. We assume that both measurements are described by the Gaussian point detectors. It is shown that a decrease of the system-detector interaction during the measurement of
A results in an increase of the fluctuations of
A, while the mean value of
A is kept unaltered. The ratio ${(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}A)}_{\mathrm{weak}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{measurement}}/{(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}A)}_{\mathrm{strong}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{measurement}}$ turns out to be universal, i.e., independent of the physical system, its quantum state, and the quantity measured. Most of our attention is focused on analyzing outcomes of the subsequent strong measurement of the quantity
B, namely, on the mean value
B and the variance ${(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}B)}^{2}$. We derive explicit analytic corrections for
B and ${(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}B)}^{2}$ arising due to the prior weak measurement of
A. Importantly, the leading-order impact of the weak measurement of
A on
B and ${(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}B)}^{2}$ is encoded in the terms ${\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}_{s}\ensuremath{\langle}\ensuremath{\psi}|[\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{A},[\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{A},{\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{B}}^{k}]]{|\ensuremath{\psi}\ensuremath{\rangle}}_{s}$, where
k=1,2 and ${|\ensuremath{\psi}\ensuremath{\rangle}}_{s}$ is the quantum state vector of our system before the measurements. Our additional contribution consists of deriving Heisenberg-like uncertainty relations for the product ${(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}A)}_{\mathrm{weak}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{measurement}}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}{(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}B)}_{\mathrm{strong}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{measurement}}$ and analyzing the case of minimum uncertainty. Finally, our theoretical developments are illustrated numerically via studying the
s states of the hydrogen atom, assuming $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{A}=\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{r}$ (atomic radius) and $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{B}=\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{H}$ (energy).
Conservation principles are essential to describe and quantify dynamical processes in all areas of physics. Classically, a conservation law holds objectively because the description of reality can be considered independent of an observation (measurement). In quantum mechanics, however, invasive observations change quantities drastically, irrespective of any classical conservation law. One may hope to overcome this nonconservation by performing a weak, almost noninvasive measurement. Interestingly, we find that the nonconservation is manifest even in weakly measured correlations if some of the other observables do not commute with the conserved quantity. Our observations show that applications of conservation laws in quantum mechanics should be considered in their specific measurement context. We provide experimentally feasible examples to observe the apparent nonconservation of energy and angular momentum.
When a measurement is made on a system that is not in an eigenstate of the measured observable, it is often assumed that some conservation law has been violated. Discussions of the effect of measurements on conserved quantities often overlook the possibility of entanglement between the measured system and the preparation apparatus. The preparation of a system in any particular state necessarily involves interaction between the apparatus and the system. Since entanglement is a generic result of interaction, as shown by Gemmer and Mahler[1], and by Durt[2,3] one would expect some nonzero entanglement between apparatus and measured system, even though the amount of such entanglement is extremely small. Because the apparatus has an enormous number of degrees of freedom relative to the measured system, even a very tiny difference between the apparatus states that are correlated with the orthogonal states of the measured system can be sufficient to account for the perceived deviation from strict conservation of the quantity in question. Hence measurements need not violate conservation laws.