Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Fair Sampling and Entanglement in Transverse-Field Quantum Annealing

Asher Lantz, Chris M. Herdman

Published Mar 15, 2021• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Fair sampling of weighted ground state configurations in quantum annealing

Bhuvanesh Sundar, David Damanik, Leonardo Dueñas‐Osorio +1 more

APS•May 1, 2019•0 citations

Quantum annealing with a non-vanishing final value of the transverse field

光嗣 西村, Kohji Nishimura, 秀稔 西森 +1 more

•Oct 1, 2017•0 citations

Acceleration of quantum annealing by individual control of the transverse field

友紀 須佐, Yuki Susa

•Jun 1, 2018•0 citations

Exponential Speedup of Quantum Annealing by Inhomogeneous Driving of the Transverse Field

友紀 須佐, Yuki Susa, 悠 山城 +5 more

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Uncertain fate of fair sampling in quantum annealing

Mario S. Könz, Guglielmo Mazzola, Andrew J. Ochoa +2 more

Recently, it was demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally on the D-Wave quantum annealer that transverse-field quantum annealing does not find all ground states with equal probability. In particular, it was proposed that more complex driver Hamiltonians beyond transverse fields might mitigate this shortcoming. Here, we investigate the mechanisms of (un)fair sampling in quantum annealing. While higher-order terms can improve the sampling for selected small problems, we present multiple counterexamples where driver Hamiltonians that go beyond transverse fields do not remove the sampling bias. Using perturbation theory we explain why this is the case. In addition, we present large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulations for spin glasses with known degeneracy in two space dimensions and demonstrate that the fair-sampling performance of quadratic driver terms is comparable to standard transverse-field drivers. Our results suggest that quantum annealing machines are not well suited for sampling applications, unless postprocessing techniques to improve the sampling are applied.

arXiv:1806.06081•Physical Review A•Sep 20, 2019•47 citations

Quantum Computation and Quantum Annealing

Akseli Partanen

•Sep 15, 2017•0 citations
Recently, it was demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally on the D-Wave quantum annealer that transverse-field quantum annealing does not find all ground states with equal probability. In particular, it was proposed that more complex driver Hamiltonians beyond transverse fields might mitigate this shortcoming. Here, we investigate the mechanisms of (un)fair sampling in quantum annealing. While higher-order terms can improve the sampling for selected small problems, we present multiple counterexamples where driver Hamiltonians that go beyond transverse fields do not remove the sampling bias. Using perturbation theory we explain why this is the case. In addition, we present large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulations for spin glasses with known degeneracy in two space dimensions and demonstrate that the fair-sampling performance of quadratic driver terms is comparable to standard transverse-field drivers. Our results suggest that quantum annealing machines are not well suited for sampling applications, unless postprocessing techniques to improve the sampling are applied.