Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Fundamental theories of physics

Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime

Felix C. Binder, Luis Alfonso Correa, Christian Gogolin, Janet Anders, Gerardo Adesso

Published Jan 1, 2018• 527 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-99046-0

Related papers

Does the Third Law of Thermodynamics Hold in the Quantum Regime?

R. F. O’connell

arXiv:quant-ph/0609159•Journal of Statistical Physics•Jul 1, 2006•22 citations

Quantum Thermodynamics

Takahiro Sagawa

SpringerBriefs in mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2022•2 citations

Structural Admissibility Regimes (SAR): Quantum and Thermodynamic Regimes from Finite Admissibility

Ravikumar Rajappa

This paper develops the quantum and thermodynamic regime structure of the Structural Admissibility Regimes (SAR) framework under finite admissibility capacity. Building on the algebraic foundations of the SAR series and the Unified Structural Admissibility System, we analyze how compatibility structure and refinement algebra generate quantum-type and thermodynamic-type behavior as admissible finite-capacity regimes. Within this framework, complex amplitude geometry arises from compatibility relations among admissible refinements, and admissible participation acquires a quadratic structure determined by compatibility organization. Cross-cut incompatibility under finite capacity produces structural selection, yielding an intrinsic mechanism for structural measurement and quantum entanglement without introducing collapse postulates or external probabilistic assumptions. Structural entropy is defined through accessible compatibility organization within the refinement algebra. Its monotonic behavior under non-invertible admissible evolution establishes an intrinsic structural arrow of time. Redistribution of admissible accessibility generates transport processes, fluctuations, and nonequilibrium thermodynamic regimes. Amplitude-level refinement dynamics and entropy-ordered accessibility evolution therefore emerge as complementary manifestations of a single admissibility-driven refinement algebra. The resulting analysis identifies structural constraints that any finite-capacity quantum or thermodynamic regime must satisfy, providing a pre-dynamical algebraic infrastructure within which domain-specific quantum and thermodynamic theories may be consistently formulated. Part of the Structural Admissibility Regimes (SAR) Applied Series, following the Unified Structural Admissibility System and preceding applications to gravitational and cosmological regimes.

•Mar 6, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Thermodynamics

Jochen Gemmer B, M. Michel, Günter Mahler A

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2009•316 citations

Quantum Quenches in the Thermodynamic Limit

Marcos Rigol

We introduce a linked-cluster based computational approach that allows one to study quantum quenches in lattice systems in the thermodynamic limit. This approach is used to study quenches in one-dimensional lattices. We provide evidence that, in the thermodynamic limit, thermalization occurs in the nonintegrable regime but fails at integrability. A phase transitionlike behavior separates the two regimes.

arXiv:1401.2160•Physical Review Letters•Apr 29, 2014•121 citations

Quantum thermodynamics

M. Hossein Partovi

Physics Letters A•Jun 1, 1989•57 citations
This paper develops the quantum and thermodynamic regime structure of the Structural Admissibility Regimes (SAR) framework under finite admissibility capacity. Building on the algebraic foundations of the SAR series and the Unified Structural Admissibility System, we analyze how compatibility structure and refinement algebra generate quantum-type and thermodynamic-type behavior as admissible finite-capacity regimes. Within this framework, complex amplitude geometry arises from compatibility relations among admissible refinements, and admissible participation acquires a quadratic structure determined by compatibility organization. Cross-cut incompatibility under finite capacity produces structural selection, yielding an intrinsic mechanism for structural measurement and quantum entanglement without introducing collapse postulates or external probabilistic assumptions. Structural entropy is defined through accessible compatibility organization within the refinement algebra. Its monotonic behavior under non-invertible admissible evolution establishes an intrinsic structural arrow of time. Redistribution of admissible accessibility generates transport processes, fluctuations, and nonequilibrium thermodynamic regimes. Amplitude-level refinement dynamics and entropy-ordered accessibility evolution therefore emerge as complementary manifestations of a single admissibility-driven refinement algebra. The resulting analysis identifies structural constraints that any finite-capacity quantum or thermodynamic regime must satisfy, providing a pre-dynamical algebraic infrastructure within which domain-specific quantum and thermodynamic theories may be consistently formulated. Part of the Structural Admissibility Regimes (SAR) Applied Series, following the Unified Structural Admissibility System and preceding applications to gravitational and cosmological regimes.