Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Communications Realized II

Yasuhiko Arakawa, Masahide Sasaki, Hideyuki Sotobayashi

Published Sep 1, 2007• 4 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging II

Ronald E. Meyers, Yanhua H. Shih

•Oct 1, 2004•2 citations

Introduction to Part II: Quantum Communications

Gianfranco Cariolaro

Signals and communication technology•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Quantum Communications

Gianfranco Cariolaro

Signals and communication technology•Jan 1, 2015•204 citations

Optical Quantum Information and Quantum Communication

Anirban Pathak, Anindita Banerjee

This Spotlight aims to provide a general introduction to linear and nonlinear optical components that are frequently used to implement the protocols for quantum computation and communication. The role of each optical element is described briefly, and it is shown that these optical elements can be combined to constitute quantum circuits for performing various quantum computing and communication tasks. Present challenges and future scopes are also mentioned briefly. Specifically, after introducing the qubit, it is stated that a quantum gate is a device that transforms a quantum state into another quantum state. Thus, most of the optical components (e.g., a beamsplitter, a wave plate, a mirror, a polarizing beamsplitter) can be viewed as quantum gates because each of these optical elements can transform a quantum state into another quantum state. This fact is the basis for constructing useful quantum circuits using optical elements. Finally, a few proposals for optical realizations of schemes for quantum communication and computation are described. In classical computation and communication, we use classical gates and bits. Similarly, in quantum computation and communication, we use their quantum analogs, i.e., quantum gates and qubit(s) [quantum bit(s)]. We have already mentioned that a bit can be realized in various ways. In the same way, a qubit can also be realized in various ways, and accordingly, corresponding quantum gates that would operate on qubits can also be realized in various ways. Here, we focus on a specific implementation: optical implementation, where qubits are realized using photons and quantum gates, and circuits are realized using various optical components. Specific merits of this realization lie in the following facts: (i) in quantum communication we need to transmit qubits from one location to the other, and transmission of photons is easier than any other realization of qubits; (ii) the effect of the environment (e.g., external electric and magnetic fields) on photons is less compared to any other implementations of qubits; and (iii) integrated optics are already a well-developed field. Keeping these points in mind, this Spotlight describes basic optical elements and how to use those elements to implement various schemes of quantum computation and communication. We will mostly describe realizations using bulk optics. However, in most cases, it is not difficult to transform these bulk-optics-based realizations into integrated optics. To begin with, in Section 1.1, we formally define a qubit and describe two alternative ways of realizing a qubit using a photon.

SPIE eBooks•Jun 9, 2016•3 citations

Error Probability Analysis of Quantum Communication with Phase-squeezed M-PSK

Nikos A. Mitsiou, Ioannis Krikidis

In this paper, we investigate the symbol error probability (SEP) of phase-squeezed M-ary phase-shift keying (M-PSK). Since the relevant observable for M-PSK detection is the optical phase, we adopt the adaptive Mark-II receiver which is a physically realizable phase measurement. First, we develop a theoretical analysis based on the phase probability operator measure (POM) of the Mark-II scheme in the Fock basis. Then, we develop two SEP methods based on the statistics of the received PSK symbol and the error introduced by the Mark-II measurement. The first method derives the phase probability density induced by the squeezed state noise and incorporates the additional Mark-II phase uncertainty through an angular convolution. Since this convolution does not admit a simple closed form, we also introduce an effective tangential-variance model, which yields a closed form SEP expression in terms of the Owen's T-function. Numerical results show that phase squeezing substantially reduces the SEP of M-PSK compared to coherent state transmission, with greater gains for higher constellation orders. Notably, for the investigated scenario, squeezing can almost double the photon efficiency of M-PSK as the mean number of transmitted photons increases. Finally, the proposed approximations closely follow the Mark-II POM analysis, typically within an accuracy of 2-4 photons, and therefore provide accurate and computationally efficient tools for analyzing phase squeezed quantum M-PSK communication.

arXiv:2606.13286•Jun 11, 2026•0 citations

Quantum communications

John Rarity, P. R. Tapster

Applied Physics B•Sep 1, 1992•4 citations
This Spotlight aims to provide a general introduction to linear and nonlinear optical components that are frequently used to implement the protocols for quantum computation and communication. The role of each optical element is described briefly, and it is shown that these optical elements can be combined to constitute quantum circuits for performing various quantum computing and communication tasks. Present challenges and future scopes are also mentioned briefly. Specifically, after introducing the qubit, it is stated that a quantum gate is a device that transforms a quantum state into another quantum state. Thus, most of the optical components (e.g., a beamsplitter, a wave plate, a mirror, a polarizing beamsplitter) can be viewed as quantum gates because each of these optical elements can transform a quantum state into another quantum state. This fact is the basis for constructing useful quantum circuits using optical elements. Finally, a few proposals for optical realizations of schemes for quantum communication and computation are described. In classical computation and communication, we use classical gates and bits. Similarly, in quantum computation and communication, we use their quantum analogs, i.e., quantum gates and qubit(s) [quantum bit(s)]. We have already mentioned that a bit can be realized in various ways. In the same way, a qubit can also be realized in various ways, and accordingly, corresponding quantum gates that would operate on qubits can also be realized in various ways. Here, we focus on a specific implementation: optical implementation, where qubits are realized using photons and quantum gates, and circuits are realized using various optical components. Specific merits of this realization lie in the following facts: (i) in quantum communication we need to transmit qubits from one location to the other, and transmission of photons is easier than any other realization of qubits; (ii) the effect of the environment (e.g., external electric and magnetic fields) on photons is less compared to any other implementations of qubits; and (iii) integrated optics are already a well-developed field. Keeping these points in mind, this Spotlight describes basic optical elements and how to use those elements to implement various schemes of quantum computation and communication. We will mostly describe realizations using bulk optics. However, in most cases, it is not difficult to transform these bulk-optics-based realizations into integrated optics. To begin with, in Section 1.1, we formally define a qubit and describe two alternative ways of realizing a qubit using a photon.
In this paper, we investigate the symbol error probability (SEP) of phase-squeezed M-ary phase-shift keying (M-PSK). Since the relevant observable for M-PSK detection is the optical phase, we adopt the adaptive Mark-II receiver which is a physically realizable phase measurement. First, we develop a theoretical analysis based on the phase probability operator measure (POM) of the Mark-II scheme in the Fock basis. Then, we develop two SEP methods based on the statistics of the received PSK symbol and the error introduced by the Mark-II measurement. The first method derives the phase probability density induced by the squeezed state noise and incorporates the additional Mark-II phase uncertainty through an angular convolution. Since this convolution does not admit a simple closed form, we also introduce an effective tangential-variance model, which yields a closed form SEP expression in terms of the Owen's T-function. Numerical results show that phase squeezing substantially reduces the SEP of M-PSK compared to coherent state transmission, with greater gains for higher constellation orders. Notably, for the investigated scenario, squeezing can almost double the photon efficiency of M-PSK as the mean number of transmitted photons increases. Finally, the proposed approximations closely follow the Mark-II POM analysis, typically within an accuracy of 2-4 photons, and therefore provide accurate and computationally efficient tools for analyzing phase squeezed quantum M-PSK communication.