Abstract Quantum physics is often considered weird, counterintuitive, and irrelevant at macroscopic scales – something for physicists and other nerds. And yet, more and more people talk about it publicly, including politicians like Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and German chancellor Angela Merkel. What has happened? Why is a theory that is about a century old suddenly in vogue when it is combined with the word technology? And why are people talking about a second quantum revolution?
Abstract Quantum physics is often considered weird, counterintuitive, and irrelevant at macroscopic scales – something for physicists and other nerds. And yet, more and more people talk about it publicly, including politicians like Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and German chancellor Angela Merkel. What has happened? Why is a theory that is about a century old suddenly in vogue when it is combined with the word technology? And why are people talking about a second quantum revolution?
Quantum computing, quantum encryption and quantum teleportation: today's physics journals sound morelike Star Trek than ever. Based on the weird and counterintuitive features of quantum mechanics, these concepts have been brought to fruition in recent years by theorists and experimentalists alike. Indeed, these ideas are now leaving physics laboratories and being used by industry to make real products. Who knows what revolutions await in computation and communications from these budding breakthroughs?
The turn of the XXth century witnessed a revolution in physics comparable to Isaac Newton’s discovery of the universal laws of mechanics and of gravitation three centuries earlier. The world required to be described in novel terms, as the immutable, deterministic view of our familiar universe had given way to a new world picture, one which featured chance, flux, and an incessant upsurge of waves of matter. Such a worldview was so radically new and counterintuitive that it gave rise to strong debates, to the effect that Albert Einstein himself tried to oppose it on the grounds that “God does not play dice”. In spite of the intense debates that accompanied its emergence, quantum mechanics quickly proved an incredibly efficacious new tool to understand and to predict a wide array of new phenomena. It was so successful that in no time it broke free from the environment of research labs to become part of daily life, making it possible, for example, to understand why some materials were conductors, while others were insulators. Along with it, came, too, the discovery of transistors, on which much of modern electronics rests. It also led to understand how novel materials known as superconductors allow the transport of electricity with no loss, thus paving the way for new developments in the fields of medical imagery or energy distribution. Other aspects of the quantum theory led to the development of atomic clocks of astounding accuracy, which would be wrong by no more than fifteen seconds, had they been set at the beginning of the universe. A hundred years later, at the turn of the XXIst century, Quantum mechanics has lost none of its astounding power. Contemporary research has undertaken the task of exploring its less immediately perceptible aspects. Groundbreaking developments have ensued, such as the teleportation of grains of light or the possibility, once predicted by the great physicist Richard Feynman, to build, one day, novel computers which, unlike the ones we are familiar with today, will be able to process innumerable numbers of operations in parallel. The Wright Colloquium will be for us the occasion to explore, in the company of five internationallyknown specialists in the field, some of the fascinating aspects of quantum mechanics. We will appraise how efficiently quantum physics can describe our world, and confront its limitation when it is faced with the infinitely small (in relation to recent experiments carried out at the CERN) as with the incommensurably large scale of sidereal spaces. We will appreciate the extent to which quantum physics already has impacted our everyday lives, and evoke the way in which novel fields such as quantum computers and quantum information will entail profound changes in the future. The quantum adventure has only just begun! Monday 15 November 2010 - 18h30 Jochen Mannhart Center for Electronic Correlations and Magnetism, University of Augsburg, Germany Quantum Physics on the Scale of Daily Life Tuesday 16 November 2010 - 18h30 Wolfgang Ketterle Nobel Laureate 2001 (Physics), Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, U.S.A. When freezing cold is not cold enough New forms of matter close to absolute zero temperature Wednesday 17 November 2010 - 18h30 David Gross Nobel Laureate 2004 (Physics), Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa-Barbara, U.S.A. Quantum Mechanics of the Very, Very Small and the Very, Very Large Thursday 18 November 2010 - 18h30 Alain Aspect CNRS senior scientist and Professor Institut d'Optique and Ecole Polytechnique Palaiseau, France. From Einstein’s intuition to quantum bits: a new quantum age? Vendredi 19 novembre 2010 - 18h30 Rainer Blatt Institute of Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Austrian Academy of Sciences and University of Innsbruck, Austria The Quantum Way of Doing Computations
Ed hai corragio di traitor scherzando un negozio si serio? [And you have the nerve to joke about so serious a business?] – Susanna My amiable friend Professor Mozart dropped by the other day. Now that his NSF grant has been cut way back, he has more time to think about things, and it's a pleasure to chat with him. Some of his views, though, are more than a little peculiar, as the following conversation clearly reveals. “I have to admit,” Mozart began sadly, “that particle physics over the last 40 or 50 years has been a disappointment. Who would have expected that in half a century we wouldn't learn anything really profound?” “Nothing profound?!” I exploded. “What about parity nonconservation? What about the breakdown of time-reversal symmetry?” “To be sure,” sighed Mozart, “we've learned that left can be distinguished from right and that time past is different from time future. But most ordinary people knew the difference between left and right all along, and who except the most highly trained physicists—temporarily, it now turns out—ever doubted for a moment that they could tell the future from the past? So establishing that the asymmetry is really there after all is certainly commendable. But about really serious problems we've discovered nothing—nothing whatsoever about the central puzzle.” “And just what might that puzzle be?” I urged, for he seemed in danger of succumbing to an attack of melancholia. He revived. “All particle physics has taught us about the central mystery is that quantum mechanics still works. Perfectly, as far as anybody can tell. What a letdown!” “Letdown? It's a triumph!” “Letdown!” he insisted. “Think of the previous half-century, when we went down from the macroscopic by seven or eight orders of magnitude. What delicious confusion! All the verities of the preceding two centuries, held by physicists and ordinary people alike, simply fell apart—collapsed. We had to start all over again, and we came up with something that worked just beautifully but was so strange that nobody had any idea what it meant except Bohr, and practically nobody could understand him . So naturally we kept probing further, getting to smaller and smaller length scales, waiting for the next revolution to shed some light on the meaning of the old one. But what happened? For 65 years, since 1925, we've been probing, at finer and finer levels.
Although many of the solitons described in previous chapters were discovered and studied in the 20th century, they could have been discovered and understood by physicists of the previous century. What I have in mind, of course, is the distinction between classical (19th century) and quantum physics (20th century). It happened that the quantum revolution in physics started at the frontier of the two centuries. At the end of 1900 the German physicist Max Planck (1858–1947) boldly introduced the notion of quanta of energy in the processes of emission of light by atoms. He also introduced a new fundamental constant in physics, the Planck constant h . The significance of this revolutionary step was not recognized until much later. Planck himself did not realize that he had started one of the greatest revolutions in physics. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.