Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference

Signal velocity, causality, and quantum noise in superluminal light propagation

A. Kuzmich, Arthur Dogariu, L.J. Wang

Published Jun 25, 2003• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Summary form only given. We consider superluminal pulse propagation in the framework of a microscopic atomic theory. Quantum fluctuations of the ground-state atomic coherences that provide gain are responsible for the excess noise in this situation. The excess noise grows exponentially with the magnitude of pulse advancement (referenced to propagation in vacuum), therefore preventing a signal being sent faster than c.

DOI
10.1109/qels.2002.1031273

Related papers

Signal Velocity, Causality, and Quantum Noise in Superluminal Light Pulse Propagation

A. Kuzmich, Arthur Dogariu, L. J. Wang +2 more

We consider pulse propagation in a linear anomalously dispersive medium where the group velocity exceeds the speed of light in vacuum ( c) or even becomes negative. A signal velocity is defined operationally based on the optical signal-to-noise ratio, and is computed for cases appropriate to the recent experiment where such a negative group velocity was observed. It is found that quantum fluctuations limit the signal velocity to values less than c.

arXiv:physics/0101068•Physical Review Letters•Apr 30, 2001•198 citations

Signal velocity, causality, and quantum noise in superluminal light pulse propagation

A. Kuzmich, Arthur Dogariu, L.J. Wang

Summary form only given. It is well known that the group velocity v/sub g/ of a light pulse can exceed c in an anomalously dispersive medium. As discussed many years ago by Sommerfeld and Brillouin, a group velocity greater than c does not violate causality because it is not the velocity of information transmission. They noted that the "frontal velocity," the velocity at which an infinitely sharp step-function-like disturbance of the light intensity propagates, can serve as a velocity of information transfer. We suggest here an operational definition of the signal velocity and apply it to the recently observed superluminal propagation of a light pulse in a gain medium.

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Nov 13, 2002•32 citations

Quantum noise and superluminal propagation

Bilha Segev, Peter W. Milonni, J. F. Babb +1 more

Causal ``superluminal'' effects have recently been observed and discussed in various contexts. The question arises whether such effects could be observed with extremely weak pulses, and what would prevent the observation of an ``optical tachyon.'' Aharonov, Reznik, and Stern (ARS) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2190 (1998)] have argued that quantum noise will preclude the observation of a superluminal group velocity when the pulse consists of one or a few photons. In this paper we reconsider this question both in a general framework and in the specific example, suggested by Chiao, Kozhekin, and Kurizki (CKK) [Phys. Rev. 77, 1254 (1996)], of off-resonant, short-pulse propagation in an optical amplifier. We derive in the case of the amplifier a signal-to-noise ratio that is consistent with the general ARS conclusions when we impose their criteria for distinguishing between superluminal propagation and propagation at the speed c. However, results consistent with the semiclassical arguments of CKK are obtained if weaker criteria are imposed, in which case the signal can exceed the noise without being ``exponentially large.'' We show that the quantum fluctuations of the field considered by ARS are closely related to superfluorescence noise. More generally, we consider the implications of unitarity for superluminal propagation and quantum noise and study, in addition to the complete and truncated wave packets considered by ARS, the residual wave packet formed by their difference. This leads to the conclusion that the noise is mostly luminal and delayed with respect to the superluminal signal. In the limit of a very weak incident signal pulse, the superluminal signal will be dominated by the noise part, and the signal-to-noise ratio will therefore be very small.

arXiv:quant-ph/0004047•Physical Review A•Jul 19, 2000•34 citations

Atomic coherence effects which produce superluminal (but causal) propagation of wavepackets

R. Y. Chiao

Analytic, limited-bandwidth signals, e.g. Gaussian wavepackets, whose frequencies lie in a transparent spectral window far below the resonance of an amplifying atomic medium, can propagate with phase, group, energy and 'signal' velocities (as defined by Sommerfeld and Brillouin) all exceeding the vacuum speed of light c. This 'superluminal' propagation may occur without significant distortion or gain. The front velocity, however, is not superluminal, and therefore Einstein causality is not violated. Applications will be discussed, including the possibility of using superluminal atomic coherence in condensed matter (e.g. macroscopic mass currents in superfluid helium which arise from vortex motions) for efficient gravitational antennae.

Quantum Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Aug 1, 1994•18 citations

Velocity of detectable information in faster-than-light pulses

Ahmed H. Dorrah, Mo Mojahedi

The velocity of detectable information (signal velocity) in a medium capable of supporting abnormal (superluminal or negative) group velocities is calculated. This is carried out by tracking the time instant at which the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the detector output reaches a predetermined threshold while considering the total classical and quantum noise of the channel in addition to the detector noise. Furthermore, the method of steepest descent is incorporated to systematically study various forms of pulse reshaping associated with superluminal propagation and its effect on SNR. By studying the behavior of SNR as a function of both space and time, the present analysis predicts the existence of a cutoff distance beyond which signal velocity of a superluminal pulse is delayed as compared to a companion pulse traveling the same distance in vacuum. Finally, the interplay between the relative strength of the medium-generated noise and the detector noise and its effect on signal velocity is discussed.

Physical Review A•Sep 16, 2014•7 citations

Superluminal (but causal) propagation of wave packets in transparent media with inverted atomic populations

R. Y. Chiao

The propagation of limited-bandwidth signals, such as Gaussian wave packets, tuned to a transparent spectral region far below the resonance of an inverted two-level atomic medium, can be superluminal, i.e., with phase, group, and energy velocities all exceeding the vacuum speed of light c. Causality is not violated, however. Little distortion and gain can accompany this propagation.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1993•249 citations
Summary form only given. We consider superluminal pulse propagation in the framework of a microscopic atomic theory. Quantum fluctuations of the ground-state atomic coherences that provide gain are responsible for the excess noise in this situation. The excess noise grows exponentially with the magnitude of pulse advancement (referenced to propagation in vacuum), therefore preventing a signal being sent faster than c.
Summary form only given. It is well known that the group velocity v/sub g/ of a light pulse can exceed c in an anomalously dispersive medium. As discussed many years ago by Sommerfeld and Brillouin, a group velocity greater than c does not violate causality because it is not the velocity of information transmission. They noted that the "frontal velocity," the velocity at which an infinitely sharp step-function-like disturbance of the light intensity propagates, can serve as a velocity of information transfer. We suggest here an operational definition of the signal velocity and apply it to the recently observed superluminal propagation of a light pulse in a gain medium.
Causal ``superluminal'' effects have recently been observed and discussed in various contexts. The question arises whether such effects could be observed with extremely weak pulses, and what would prevent the observation of an ``optical tachyon.'' Aharonov, Reznik, and Stern (ARS) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2190 (1998)] have argued that quantum noise will preclude the observation of a superluminal group velocity when the pulse consists of one or a few photons. In this paper we reconsider this question both in a general framework and in the specific example, suggested by Chiao, Kozhekin, and Kurizki (CKK) [Phys. Rev. 77, 1254 (1996)], of off-resonant, short-pulse propagation in an optical amplifier. We derive in the case of the amplifier a signal-to-noise ratio that is consistent with the general ARS conclusions when we impose their criteria for distinguishing between superluminal propagation and propagation at the speed c. However, results consistent with the semiclassical arguments of CKK are obtained if weaker criteria are imposed, in which case the signal can exceed the noise without being ``exponentially large.'' We show that the quantum fluctuations of the field considered by ARS are closely related to superfluorescence noise. More generally, we consider the implications of unitarity for superluminal propagation and quantum noise and study, in addition to the complete and truncated wave packets considered by ARS, the residual wave packet formed by their difference. This leads to the conclusion that the noise is mostly luminal and delayed with respect to the superluminal signal. In the limit of a very weak incident signal pulse, the superluminal signal will be dominated by the noise part, and the signal-to-noise ratio will therefore be very small.
Analytic, limited-bandwidth signals, e.g. Gaussian wavepackets, whose frequencies lie in a transparent spectral window far below the resonance of an amplifying atomic medium, can propagate with phase, group, energy and 'signal' velocities (as defined by Sommerfeld and Brillouin) all exceeding the vacuum speed of light c. This 'superluminal' propagation may occur without significant distortion or gain. The front velocity, however, is not superluminal, and therefore Einstein causality is not violated. Applications will be discussed, including the possibility of using superluminal atomic coherence in condensed matter (e.g. macroscopic mass currents in superfluid helium which arise from vortex motions) for efficient gravitational antennae.
The velocity of detectable information (signal velocity) in a medium capable of supporting abnormal (superluminal or negative) group velocities is calculated. This is carried out by tracking the time instant at which the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the detector output reaches a predetermined threshold while considering the total classical and quantum noise of the channel in addition to the detector noise. Furthermore, the method of steepest descent is incorporated to systematically study various forms of pulse reshaping associated with superluminal propagation and its effect on SNR. By studying the behavior of SNR as a function of both space and time, the present analysis predicts the existence of a cutoff distance beyond which signal velocity of a superluminal pulse is delayed as compared to a companion pulse traveling the same distance in vacuum. Finally, the interplay between the relative strength of the medium-generated noise and the detector noise and its effect on signal velocity is discussed.