Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Simulating the Fermi-Hubbard model on Google's superconducting quantum processor

Jiang Zhang, Vadim Smelyanskiy

Published Mar 15, 2021• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Emulating the 1-Dimensional Fermi-Hubbard Model with Superconducting Qubits

Jan-Michael Reiner, Michael Marthaler, Gerd Schön

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 14, 2016•0 citations

Practical demonstration of quantum approximate optimization on Google’s superconducting qubit processor

Matthew P. Harrigan

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 2, 2020•0 citations

Quantum Simulation of the Fermi-Hubbard Model

Geoffrey Ji, Christie Chiu, Annabelle Bohrdt +7 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2019•0 citations

Quantum simulation of a Fermi–Hubbard model using a semiconductor quantum dot array

Toivo Hensgens, T. Fujita, Laurens Janssen +6 more

arXiv:1702.07511•Nature•Aug 1, 2017•352 citations

Quantum simulations of a Fermi-Hubbard model using a semiconductor quantum dot array

Toivo Hensgens, T. Fujita, Laurens Janssen +5 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2017•0 citations

Towards Studying Superconductivity in the Fermi-Hubbard Model on Rydberg Atoms

Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, Nora M. Bauer

We present a method for calculating the ground state energy of the Fermi-Hubbard model leveraging Rydberg atom processors and sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD). By exploiting the perturbative relationship between the Fermi-Hubbard and Heisenberg models, the procedure samples from the Heisenberg model as prepared on the Rydberg atom processor, and uses the samples to diagonalize the Fermi-Hubbard model for large U. We include anisotropy and next-nearest-neighbor interactions and discuss the relevant regime for quasi-superconductivity in the 1-dimensional Fermi- Hubbard model. Numerical and experimental results on the Aquila quantum processor are presented for ground state energy calculations as well as the chemical potential. We find that the Heisenberg model sampling in the studied regime is sufficient to converge near to the ground state for up to 56 qubits, and we see a clear advantage of Rydberg atom sampling as opposed to random sampling even with 10x more samples for diagonalization. We also present a gate-based implementation of the gate-based SQD algorithm on IBM Quantum hardware for 56-qubit Hubbard model as a benchmark. Finally, we provide a gap analysis for studying emergent superconductivity using this method.

quant-pharXiv:2603.06529•Quantum Science and Technology•Mar 9, 2026•0 citations
We present a method for calculating the ground state energy of the Fermi-Hubbard model leveraging Rydberg atom processors and sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD). By exploiting the perturbative relationship between the Fermi-Hubbard and Heisenberg models, the procedure samples from the Heisenberg model as prepared on the Rydberg atom processor, and uses the samples to diagonalize the Fermi-Hubbard model for large U. We include anisotropy and next-nearest-neighbor interactions and discuss the relevant regime for quasi-superconductivity in the 1-dimensional Fermi- Hubbard model. Numerical and experimental results on the Aquila quantum processor are presented for ground state energy calculations as well as the chemical potential. We find that the Heisenberg model sampling in the studied regime is sufficient to converge near to the ground state for up to 56 qubits, and we see a clear advantage of Rydberg atom sampling as opposed to random sampling even with 10x more samples for diagonalization. We also present a gate-based implementation of the gate-based SQD algorithm on IBM Quantum hardware for 56-qubit Hubbard model as a benchmark. Finally, we provide a gap analysis for studying emergent superconductivity using this method.