Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics

Universality of the Heisenberg Limit for Estimates of Random Phase Shifts

Dominic William Berry, Michael J. W. Hall, Marcin Zwierz, Howard M. Wiseman

Published Jan 1, 2012• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Recent work has suggested that it is possible to perform phase measurements more accurately than the Heisenberg limit. We show that, when one averages over random phase shifts, the Heisenberg limit is universal.
DOI
10.1364/qels.2012.qtu2e.7

Related papers

Universality of the Heisenberg limit for estimates of random phase shifts

Michael J. W. Hall, Dominic William Berry, Marcin Zwierz +1 more

The Heisenberg limit traditionally provides a lower bound on the phase uncertainty scaling as $1/\ensuremath{\langle}N\ensuremath{\rangle}$, where $\ensuremath{\langle}N\ensuremath{\rangle}$ is the mean number of photons in the probe. However, this limit has a number of loopholes which potentially might be exploited to achieve measurements with even greater accuracy. Here we close these loopholes by proving a completely rigorous form of the Heisenberg limit for the average error over all phase shifts, applicable to any estimate of a completely unknown phase shift. Our result gives a completely general, constraint-free, and nonasymptotic statement of the Heisenberg limit. It holds for all phase estimation schemes, including multiple passes, nonlinear phase shifts, multimode probes, and arbitrary measurements.

arXiv:1111.0788•Physical Review A•Apr 13, 2012•78 citations

Optimal Heisenberg-style bounds for the average performance of arbitrary phase estimates

Dominic William Berry, Michael J. W. Hall, Marcin Zwierz +1 more

The ultimate bound to the accuracy of phase estimates is often assumed to be given by the Heisenberg limit. Recent work seemed to indicate that this bound can be violated, yielding measurements with much higher accuracy than was previously expected. The Heisenberg limit can be restored as a rigorous bound to the accuracy provided one considers the accuracy averaged over the possible values of the unknown phase, as we have recently shown [Phys. Rev. A 85, 041802(R) (2012)]. Here we present an expanded proof of this result together with a number of additional results, including the proof of a previously conjectured stronger bound in the asymptotic limit. Other measures of the accuracy are examined, as well as other restrictions on the generator of the phase shifts. We provide expanded numerical results for the minimum error and asymptotic expansions. The significance of the results claiming violation of the Heisenberg limit is assessed, followed by a detailed discussion of the limitations of the Cram\'er-Rao bound.

arXiv:1209.3547•Physical Review A•Nov 13, 2012•50 citations

Sub-Heisenberg estimation of non-random phase shifts

Ángel Rivas, Alfredo Luis

We provide evidence that the uncertainty in detection of small and deterministic phase-shift deviations from a working point can be lower than the Heisenberg bound, for a fixed finite mean number of photons. We achieve that by exploiting nonlinearity of estimators and coherence with the vacuum.

arXiv:1105.6310•New Journal of Physics•Sep 26, 2012•58 citations

Quantum Measurements Cannot be Proved to be Random

Caroline Rogers

We show that it is impossible to prove that the outcome of a quantum measurement is random.

arXiv:1008.5022•Aug 30, 2010•0 citations

Breaking the weak Heisenberg limit

Alfredo Luis

We provide a very simple case showing that the weak form of the Heisenberg limit can be beaten while the prior information is improved without bias.

arXiv:1607.07668•Physical Review A•Mar 13, 2017•17 citations

Sub-Heisenberg phase uncertainties

Luca Pezzè

Phase shift estimation with uncertainty below the Heisenberg limit, $\ensuremath{\Delta}{\ensuremath{\phi}}_{\mathrm{HL}}\ensuremath{\propto}1/{\overline{N}}_{T}$, where ${\overline{N}}_{T}$ is the total average number of particles employed, is a mirage of linear quantum interferometry. Recently, Rivas and Luis, [New J. Phys. 14, 093052 (2012)] proposed a scheme to achieve a phase uncertainty $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\propto}1/{\overline{N}}_{T}^{k}$, with $k$ an arbitrary exponent. This sparked an intense debate in the literature which, ultimately, does not exclude the possibility to overcome $\ensuremath{\Delta}{\ensuremath{\phi}}_{\mathrm{HL}}$ at specific phase values. Our numerical analysis of the Rivas and Luis proposal shows that sub-Heisenberg uncertainties are obtained only when the estimator is strongly biased. No violation of the Heisenberg limit is found after bias correction or when using a bias-free Bayesian analysis.

Physical Review A•Dec 12, 2013•23 citations
The Heisenberg limit traditionally provides a lower bound on the phase uncertainty scaling as $1/\ensuremath{\langle}N\ensuremath{\rangle}$, where $\ensuremath{\langle}N\ensuremath{\rangle}$ is the mean number of photons in the probe. However, this limit has a number of loopholes which potentially might be exploited to achieve measurements with even greater accuracy. Here we close these loopholes by proving a completely rigorous form of the Heisenberg limit for the average error over all phase shifts, applicable to any estimate of a completely unknown phase shift. Our result gives a completely general, constraint-free, and nonasymptotic statement of the Heisenberg limit. It holds for all phase estimation schemes, including multiple passes, nonlinear phase shifts, multimode probes, and arbitrary measurements.
The ultimate bound to the accuracy of phase estimates is often assumed to be given by the Heisenberg limit. Recent work seemed to indicate that this bound can be violated, yielding measurements with much higher accuracy than was previously expected. The Heisenberg limit can be restored as a rigorous bound to the accuracy provided one considers the accuracy averaged over the possible values of the unknown phase, as we have recently shown [Phys. Rev. A 85, 041802(R) (2012)]. Here we present an expanded proof of this result together with a number of additional results, including the proof of a previously conjectured stronger bound in the asymptotic limit. Other measures of the accuracy are examined, as well as other restrictions on the generator of the phase shifts. We provide expanded numerical results for the minimum error and asymptotic expansions. The significance of the results claiming violation of the Heisenberg limit is assessed, followed by a detailed discussion of the limitations of the Cram\'er-Rao bound.
Phase shift estimation with uncertainty below the Heisenberg limit, $\ensuremath{\Delta}{\ensuremath{\phi}}_{\mathrm{HL}}\ensuremath{\propto}1/{\overline{N}}_{T}$, where N‾T{\overline{N}}_{T}NT​ is the total average number of particles employed, is a mirage of linear quantum interferometry. Recently, Rivas and Luis, [New J. Phys. 14, 093052 (2012)] proposed a scheme to achieve a phase uncertainty $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\propto}1/{\overline{N}}_{T}^{k}$, with kkk an arbitrary exponent. This sparked an intense debate in the literature which, ultimately, does not exclude the possibility to overcome $\ensuremath{\Delta}{\ensuremath{\phi}}_{\mathrm{HL}}$ at specific phase values. Our numerical analysis of the Rivas and Luis proposal shows that sub-Heisenberg uncertainties are obtained only when the estimator is strongly biased. No violation of the Heisenberg limit is found after bias correction or when using a bias-free Bayesian analysis.