Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chinese Physics Letters

Comment on “Cryptanalysis and Improvement of a Quantum Network System of QSS-QDC Using χ-Type Entangled States" [Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 (2012) 110305]

Zhihao Liu, Hanwu Chen

Published Jul 1, 2013• 4 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We point out that the quantum secret sharing (QSS) protocol proposed by Gao et al. [ Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 (2012) 110305 ] has some defects. Thus, some strategies are given to mend them.
DOI
10.1088/0256-307x/30/7/079903

Related papers

Reply to the Comment on “Cryptanalysis and Improvement of a Quantum Network System of QSS-QDC Using χ-Type Entangled States" [Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 (2012) 110305]

Gan Gao, Ming Fang, Mu-Tian Cheng

We first make a small modification to the improved protocol in order to enhance its efficiency. Secondly, the explanation that our improved protocol can prevent Trent from using the {|Ψ ± 2 〉,|Φ ± 2 〉} basis is given.

Chinese Physics Letters•Jul 1, 2013•3 citations

Cryptanalysis and Improvement of a Quantum Network System of QSS-QDC Using χ-Type Entangled States

Gan Gao, Ming Fang, Mu-Tian Cheng

In the paper [ Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 (2012) 050303 ] of Hong et al., two quantum secret sharing protocols were proposed. We study the security of the second protocol and find that it is insecure. Acting as the communication center, Trent may eavesdrop Alice's secret messages without introducing any error. Finally, a feasible improvement of the second protocol is given.

Chinese Physics Letters•Nov 1, 2012•7 citations

Comment on “A Quantum Network System of QSS-QDC Using χ-Type Entangled States" [Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 (2012) 050303]

Zhihao Liu, Hanwu Chen, Wenjie Liu +1 more

Two quantum secret sharing (QSS) protocols in a multiuser quantum direct communication (QDC) network system were put forward by Hong et al. [ Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 (2012) 050303 ]. However, we find that either agent (Bob or Charlie) alone can obtain half the information about the sender's secret without collaboration with the other, which does not satisfy the security requirement of QSS. Moreover, the secret message sent by Alice in the second protocol can be eavesdropped on or its communication can be disturbed by the builder of quantum channels (Trent).

Chinese Physics Letters•Mar 1, 2013•6 citations

Reply to the Comment on “A Quantum Network System of QSS-QDC Using χ—Type Entangled States"

Changho Hong, Hyung-Jin Yang

Chinese Physics Letters•Jun 1, 2013•2 citations

Comment on “Quantum secret sharing between multiparty and multiparty without entanglement”

Chuan-Ming Li, Chi-Chao Chang, Tzonelih Hwang

Recently, Yan and Gao [Phys. Rev. A 72, 012304 (2005)] presented a quantum secret sharing protocol which allows a secret message to be shared between two groups of parties ($m$ parties in group 1 and $n$ parties in group 2). Their protocol is claimed to be secure that, except with the cooperation of the entire group 1 or group 2, no subgroup of either group 1 or group 2 can extract the secret message. However, this study points out that the $m\text{th}$ party (the last party to process the quantum state) of group 1 can maliciously replace the secret message with an arbitrary message without the detection of the other parties.

Physical Review A•Jan 6, 2006•35 citations

Solution to Information Leakage in a Quantum Network System of QSS-QDC Using χ-Type Entangled States

Tian-Yu Ye

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 26, 2013•0 citations
Two quantum secret sharing (QSS) protocols in a multiuser quantum direct communication (QDC) network system were put forward by Hong et al. [ Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 (2012) 050303 ]. However, we find that either agent (Bob or Charlie) alone can obtain half the information about the sender's secret without collaboration with the other, which does not satisfy the security requirement of QSS. Moreover, the secret message sent by Alice in the second protocol can be eavesdropped on or its communication can be disturbed by the builder of quantum channels (Trent).
Recently, Yan and Gao [Phys. Rev. A 72, 012304 (2005)] presented a quantum secret sharing protocol which allows a secret message to be shared between two groups of parties (mmm parties in group 1 and nnn parties in group 2). Their protocol is claimed to be secure that, except with the cooperation of the entire group 1 or group 2, no subgroup of either group 1 or group 2 can extract the secret message. However, this study points out that the mthm\text{th}mth party (the last party to process the quantum state) of group 1 can maliciously replace the secret message with an arbitrary message without the detection of the other parties.