Multi-party computation (MPC) sorting and searching protocols are frequently used in different databases with varied applications, as in cooperative intrusion detection systems, private computation of set intersection and oblivious RAM. Ivan Damgard et al. have proposed two techniques i.e., bit-decomposition protocol and bit-wise less than protocol for MPC. These two protocols are used as building blocks and have proposed two oblivious MPC protocols. The proposed protocols are based on data-dependent algorithms such as insertion sort and binary search. The proposed multi-party sorting protocol takes the shares of the elements as input and outputs the shares of the elements in sorted order. The proposed protocol exhibits O ( 1 ) constant round complexity and O ( n log n ) communication complexity. The proposed multi-party binary search protocol takes two inputs. One is the shares of the elements in sorted order and the other one is the shares of the element to be searched. If the position of the search element exists, the protocol returns the corresponding shares, otherwise it returns shares of zero. The proposed multi-party binary search protocol exhibits O ( 1 ) round complexity and O ( n log n ) communication complexity. The proposed multi-party sorting protocol works better than the existing quicksort protocol when the input is in almost sorted order. The proposed multi-party searching protocol gives almost the same results, when compared to the general binary search algorithm.
Multi-party computation (MPC) sorting and searching protocols are frequently used in different databases with varied applications, as in cooperative intrusion detection systems, private computation of set intersection and oblivious RAM. Ivan Damgard et al. have proposed two techniques i.e., bit-decomposition protocol and bit-wise less than protocol for MPC. These two protocols are used as building blocks and have proposed two oblivious MPC protocols. The proposed protocols are based on data-dependent algorithms such as insertion sort and binary search. The proposed multi-party sorting protocol takes the shares of the elements as input and outputs the shares of the elements in sorted order. The proposed protocol exhibits O ( 1 ) constant round complexity and O ( n log n ) communication complexity. The proposed multi-party binary search protocol takes two inputs. One is the shares of the elements in sorted order and the other one is the shares of the element to be searched. If the position of the search element exists, the protocol returns the corresponding shares, otherwise it returns shares of zero. The proposed multi-party binary search protocol exhibits O ( 1 ) round complexity and O ( n log n ) communication complexity. The proposed multi-party sorting protocol works better than the existing quicksort protocol when the input is in almost sorted order. The proposed multi-party searching protocol gives almost the same results, when compared to the general binary search algorithm.
Data-oblivious algorithms are a key component of many secure computation protocols. In this work, we show that advances in secure multiparty shuffling algorithms can be used to increase the efficiency of several key cryptographic tools. The key observation is that many secure computation protocols rely heavily on secure shuffles. The best data-oblivious shuffling algorithms require O(n log n), operations, but in the two-party or multiparty setting, secure shuffling can be achieved with only O(n) communication. Leveraging the efficiency of secure multiparty shuffling, we give novel, information-theoretic algorithms that improve the efficiency of securely sorting sparse lists, secure stable compaction, and securely merging two sorted lists. Securely sorting private lists is a key component of many larger secure computation protocols. The best data-oblivious sorting algorithms for sorting a list of n elements require O(n log n) comparisons. Using black-box access to a linear-communication secure shuffle, we give a secure algorithm for sorting a list of length n with t ≪ n nonzero elements with communication O(t log² n + n), which beats the best oblivious algorithms when the number of nonzero elements, t, satisfies t < n/log² n. Secure compaction is the problem of removing dummy elements from a list, and is essentially equivalent to sorting on 1-bit keys. The best oblivious compaction algorithms run in O(n)-time, but they are unstable, i.e., the order of the remaining elements is not preserved. Using black-box access to a linear-communication secure shuffle, we give an information-theoretic stable compaction algorithm with only O(n) communication. Our main result is a novel secure merge protocol. The best previous algorithms for securely merging two sorted lists into a sorted whole required O(n log n) secure operations. Using black-box access to an O(n)-communication secure shuffle, we give the first multi-party secure merge algorithm that requires only O(n log log n) communication. Our algorithm takes as input n secret-shared values, and outputs a secret-sharing of the sorted list. All our algorithms are generic, i.e., they can be implemented using generic secure computations techniques and make black-box access to a secure shuffle. Our techniques extend naturally to the multiparty situation (with a constant number of parties) as well as to handle malicious adversaries without changing the asymptotic efficiency. These algorithm have applications to securely computing database joins and order statistics on private data as well as multiparty Oblivious RAM protocols.
In this work, we present two new actively secure, constant-round multi-party computation (MPC) protocols with security against all-but-one corruptions. Our protocols both start with an actively secure MPC protocol, which may have linear round complexity in the depth of the circuit, and compile it into a constant-round protocol based on garbled circuits, with very low overhead. Our first protocol takes a generic approach using any secret-sharing-based MPC protocol for binary circuits, and a correlated oblivious transfer functionality. Our second protocol builds on secret-sharing-based MPC with information-theoretic MACs. This approach is less flexible, being based on a specific form of MPC, but requires no additional oblivious transfers to compute the garbled circuit. In both approaches, the underlying secret-sharing-based protocol is only used for one actively secure F2 multiplication per AND gate . An interesting consequence of this is that, with current techniques, constant-round MPC for binary circuits is not much more expensive than practical, non-constant-round protocols. We demonstrate the practicality of our second protocol with an implementation and perform experiments with up to 9 parties securely computing the AES and SHA-256 circuits. Our running times improve upon the best possible performance with previous protocols in this setting by 60 times.
Secure multi-party computation (MPC) allows a set of parties to compute a function jointly while keeping their inputs private. Compared with the MPC based on garbled circuits, some recent research results show that MPC based on secret sharing (SS) works at a very high speed. Moreover, SS-based MPC can be easily vectorized and achieve higher throughput. In SS-based MPC, however, we need many communication rounds for computing concrete protocols like equality check, less-than comparison, etc. This property is not suited for large-latency environments like the Internet (or WAN). In this paper, we construct semi-honest secure communication-efficient two-party protocols. The core technique is Beaver triple extension, which is a new tool for treating multi-fan-in gates, and we also show how to use it efficiently. We mainly focus on reducing the number of communication rounds, and our protocols also succeed in reducing the number of communication bits (in most cases). As an example, we propose a less-than comparison protocol (under practical parameters) with three communication rounds. This is less than a half compared with the previous work. Moreover, the number of communication bits is also 38.4% fewer. As a result, total online execution time is 56.1% shorter than the previous work adopting the same settings. Although the computation costs of our protocols are more expensive than those of previous work, we confirm via experiments that such a disadvantage has small effects on the whole online performance in the typical WAN environments.
Bit-decomposition is an important primitive in multi-party computation (MPC). Given a sharing of secret x, it allows the parties to compute the sharings of the bits of x in constant rounds. With the help of bit-decomposition, we will be able to construct constant-rounds protocols for various MPC problems, such as equality test, comparison, public modulo reduction and private exponentiation, which are four main applications of bit-decomposition. However, when considering perfect security, bit-decomposition does not have a linear communication complexity. Thus any protocols involving bit-decomposition inherit this inefficiency, i.e. the communication complexity is non-linear. Constructing protocols for MPC problems without relying on bit-decomposition is a meaningful work because this may provide us with perfect secure protocols with linear communication complexity. It is already proved that equality test, comparison and public modulo reduction can be solved without involving bit-decomposition and the communication complexity can be reduced to linear. However, it remains an open problem whether private exponentiation could be done without relying on bit-decomposition. In this paper, maybe somewhat surprisingly, we show that it can. That is to say, we construct
Integer division is one of the most fundamental arithmetic operators and is ubiquitously used. However, the existing division protocols in secure multi-party computation (MPC) are inefficient and very complex, and this has been a barrier to applications of MPC such as secure machine learning. We already have some secure division protocols working in ℤ2n. However, these existing results have drawbacks that those protocols needed many communication rounds and needed to use bigger integers than in/output. In this paper, we improve a secure division protocol in two ways. First, we construct a new protocol using only the same size integers as in/output. Second, we build efficient constant-round building blocks used as subprotocols in the division protocol. With these two improvements, communication rounds of our division protocol are reduced to about 36% (87 rounds → 31 rounds) for 64-bit integers in comparison with the most efficient previous one.
Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) allows a set of parties, each having its own private data, to compute a function of their joint data such that the parties only learn the output of this function and everything else about their data is hidden. MPC is a fundamental cryptographic abstraction that captures many other natural cryptographic primitives as special cases. It also has a wide range of practical applications such as conducting secure electronic auctions, delegating sensitive computation to untrusted cloud service providers, secure computation on genomic data and training machine learning models on private data.A long-standing open problem in this area is to construct MPC protocols that have {\\it optimal} (two-round) round complexity under the {\\it weakest} possible cryptographic hardness assumptions.We {\\it completely resolve} this problem by showing lower bounds and matching upper bounds on the hardness assumptions required for constructing round-optimal MPC. Specifically, we obtain the following results.\\begin{itemize}\\item \\textbf{Black-Box Separation.} We show that there exists no construction of two-round semi-honest MPC protocol for general functions that makes black-box use of a two-round oblivious transfer. As a corollary, a similar separation holds when starting with any 2-party functionality other than oblivious transfer. \\item \\textbf{Non-Black-Box Construction.} We show that the above negative result can be bypassed by making non-black-box use of a two-round oblivious transfer. Specifically, starting from a semi-honest (resp. malicious) secure two-round oblivious transfer protocol, we construct a two-round MPC protocol against semi-honest (resp. malicious) adversaries. \\end{itemize}Since any two-round MPC protocol for general functionalities implies a two-round oblivious transfer as a special case, the above two results show that non-black-box use of oblivious transfer is {\\it necessary and sufficient} to construct round-optimal MPC protocols.