Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Operators. Wave function. The Schrodinger Equation.

In the first part of this chapter, the Hamiltonian function and Hamilton-Jacobi equation are presented. The latter is the starting point of Schrödinger’s work to obtain his wave equation. Next, the derivation of the wave equation is given along with the foundations of Schrödinger’s wave mechanics, i.e., the Hamilton’s analogy between optics and mechanics. It is also introduced some applications of the Schrödinger’s new quantum theory to several problems (radial function of the hydrogen atom, Compton effect and quantum harmonic oscillator). Other applications are also indicated in this chapter. The Dirac notation is introduced followed by the derivation of the expectation value in quantum mechanics and its derivation with respect to time. Next, Born’s probability theory and the superposition principle are introduced followed by the derivation of the quantum linear momentum operator. Afterwards, the normalization of a wave function and the orthogonality of a wave function are given followed by the properties of the Hermitian operator. In the end of the chapter, several examples and exercises are presented (168 words).In the first part of this chapter, the Hamiltonian function and Hamilton-Jacobi equation are presented. The latter is the starting point of Schrödinger’s work to obtain his wave equation. Next, the derivation of the wave equation is given along with the foundations of Schrödinger’s wave mechanics, i.e., the Hamilton’s analogy between optics and mechanics. It is also introduced some applications of the Schrödinger’s new quantum theory to several problems (radial function of the hydrogen atom, Compton effect and quantum harmonic oscillator). Other applications are also indicated in this chapter. The Dirac notation is introduced followed by the derivation of the expectation value in quantum mechanics and its derivation with respect to time. Next, Born’s probability theory and the superposition principle are introduced followed by the derivation of the quantum linear momentum operator. Afterwards, the normalization of a wave function and the orthogonality of a wave function are given followed by the properties of the Hermitian operator. In the end of the chapter, several examples and exercises are presented (168 words).

CRC Press eBooksMar 21, 20220 citations

INTRODUCTORY QUANTUM MECHANICS II: THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooksJan 1, 20100 citations

Schrödinger-like Equations and Wave Mechanics: Bridging Quantum and Classical Realms

Oleg A. Chevtchenko

This study delves into the realm of Schrödinger equations and wave mechanics, aiming to see if they could provide a foundation comparable in generality to that formulated in the preceding chapter, and to bridge the gap between classical and quantum physics. It begins by deriving a family of Schrödinger-like equations. The study introduces an intuitive approach for deriving an entire spectrum of Schrödinger-like equations, encompassing classical and novel variants, through the utilization of the complex wave function and its conjugate, along with the assumptionsA01, A08. Examining the concepts of the complex wave function $\psi$ and the multi-vector wave function $\Psi$ reveals their equal generality, suggesting the applicability of Schrödinger-like equations in the context of multi-vectors, including both $\psi$ and the phase $\Phi$ . To explore the correspondence principle between quantum and classical mechanics, a well-studied example is dissected in Section 2.4, necessitating the development of a suitable wave function (2.50). The use of the real function [1, (1.50)] to form the complex test function (2.50) is a logical step, and its substitution into the Schrödinger equations aims to yield an identity. The substitution of (2.50) reveals a discrepancy between the left and right sides of the Schrödinger equations (2.25, 2.26), highlighting their inadequacy in describing the classical mechanics example accurately. This observation underscores the limitations of classical Schrödinger equations and their departure from the correspondence principle. Consequently, a more comprehensive set of Schrödinger-like equations (2.58-2.68) is derived, rendering the previously considered equations (2.25, 2.26) irrelevant. Substituting the test function (2.50) into equations (2.58-2.68) demonstrates their soundness and suitability for the example, establishing the correspondence principle between classical and quantum mechanics. Our analysis indicates that the classical set [1, (1.4-1.6)] exhibits a higher degree of generality than the quantum one (2.58-2.68), thereby deferring the definitive validation of this assertion to forthcoming research endeavours. These findings underscore the potential significance of our framework in bridging the gap between quantum and classical mechanics, promising further exploration and validation in future studies.This study delves into the realm of Schrödinger equations and wave mechanics, aiming to see if they could provide a foundation comparable in generality to that formulated in the preceding chapter, and to bridge the gap between classical and quantum physics. It begins by deriving a family of Schrödinger-like equations. The study introduces an intuitive approach for deriving an entire spectrum of Schrödinger-like equations, encompassing classical and novel variants, through the utilization of the complex wave function and its conjugate, along with the assumptionsA01, A08. Examining the concepts of the complex wave function $\psi$ and the multi-vector wave function $\Psi$ reveals their equal generality, suggesting the applicability of Schrödinger-like equations in the context of multi-vectors, including both $\psi$ and the phase $\Phi$ . To explore the correspondence principle between quantum and classical mechanics, a well-studied example is dissected in Section 2.4, necessitating the development of a suitable wave function (2.50). The use of the real function [1, (1.50)] to form the complex test function (2.50) is a logical step, and its substitution into the Schrödinger equations aims to yield an identity. The substitution of (2.50) reveals a discrepancy between the left and right sides of the Schrödinger equations (2.25, 2.26), highlighting their inadequacy in describing the classical mechanics example accurately. This observation underscores the limitations of classical Schrödinger equations and their departure from the correspondence principle. Consequently, a more comprehensive set of Schrödinger-like equations (2.58-2.68) is derived, rendering the previously considered equations (2.25, 2.26) irrelevant. Substituting the test function (2.50) into equations (2.58-2.68) demonstrates their soundness and suitability for the example, establishing the correspondence principle between classical and quantum mechanics. Our analysis indicates that the classical set [1, (1.4-1.6)] exhibits a higher degree of generality than the quantum one (2.58-2.68), thereby deferring the definitive validation of this assertion to forthcoming research endeavours. These findings underscore the potential significance of our framework in bridging the gap between quantum and classical mechanics, promising further exploration and validation in future studies.

Book Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International)Nov 23, 20230 citations

Proposing the 'IN Sign' for Enhanced Interpretations of Schrödinger's Equation in Quantum Mechanics

Hasan Abdulsalam Ali Emran

This study proposes an addition to Schrödinger's equation by introducing the 'IN sign,' enabling the energy operator and wave function to interact dynamically and swap roles. This modification allows the energy operator to act within a field of waves and incorporates additional quantum states. The 'IN sign' is a step toward understanding wave function evolution across multiple variables, offering potential applications in quantum mechanics and topological studies. Purpose: This research aims to enhance Schrödinger's equation by integrating the 'IN sign,' allowing dynamic interaction between the energy operator and the wave function while extending its application to complex potentials and topological frameworks. Significance: The proposed modification has profound implications in quantum mechanics, enabling more comprehensive modeling of wave functions and their interactions across multidimensional systems.This study proposes an addition to Schrödinger's equation by introducing the 'IN sign,' enabling the energy operator and wave function to interact dynamically and swap roles. This modification allows the energy operator to act within a field of waves and incorporates additional quantum states. The 'IN sign' is a step toward understanding wave function evolution across multiple variables, offering potential applications in quantum mechanics and topological studies. Purpose: This research aims to enhance Schrödinger's equation by integrating the 'IN sign,' allowing dynamic interaction between the energy operator and the wave function while extending its application to complex potentials and topological frameworks. Significance: The proposed modification has profound implications in quantum mechanics, enabling more comprehensive modeling of wave functions and their interactions across multidimensional systems.

Journal of Educational Research and PoliciesMar 27, 20250 citations

Introductory Quantum Mechanics II: The Schrödinger Equation

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooksJun 1, 20100 citations

\psi

and the multi-vector wave function

\Psi

reveals their equal generality, suggesting the applicability of Schrödinger-like equations in the context of multi-vectors, including both

\psi

and the phase

\Phi

. To explore the correspondence principle between quantum and classical mechanics, a well-studied example is dissected in Section 2.4, necessitating the development of a suitable wave function (2.50). The use of the real function [1, (1.50)] to form the complex test function (2.50) is a logical step, and its substitution into the Schrödinger equations aims to yield an identity. The substitution of (2.50) reveals a discrepancy between the left and right sides of the Schrödinger equations (2.25, 2.26), highlighting their inadequacy in describing the classical mechanics example accurately. This observation underscores the limitations of classical Schrödinger equations and their departure from the correspondence principle. Consequently, a more comprehensive set of Schrödinger-like equations (2.58-2.68) is derived, rendering the previously considered equations (2.25, 2.26) irrelevant. Substituting the test function (2.50) into equations (2.58-2.68) demonstrates their soundness and suitability for the example, establishing the correspondence principle between classical and quantum mechanics. Our analysis indicates that the classical set [1, (1.4-1.6)] exhibits a higher degree of generality than the quantum one (2.58-2.68), thereby deferring the definitive validation of this assertion to forthcoming research endeavours. These findings underscore the potential significance of our framework in bridging the gap between quantum and classical mechanics, promising further exploration and validation in future studies.