Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Remarks on the notion of classical systems

Bernard d’Espagnat

Published Jan 1, 1969• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Causal influence in operational probabilistic theories

Paolo Perinotti

We study the relation of causal influence between input systems of a reversible evolution and its output systems, in the context of operational probabilistic theories. We analyse two different definitions that are borrowed from the literature on quantum theory—where they are equivalent. One is the notion based on signalling, and the other one is the notion used to define the neighbourhood of a cell in a quantum cellular automaton. The latter definition, that we adopt in the general scenario, turns out to be strictly weaker than the former: it is possible for a system to have causal influence on another one without signalling to it. Remarkably, the counterexample comes from classical theory, where the proposed notion of causal influence determines a redefinition of the neighbourhood of a cell in cellular automata. We stress that, according to our definition, it is impossible anyway to have causal influence in the absence of an interaction, e.g. in a Bell-like scenario. We study various conditions for causal influence, and introduce the feature that we call no interaction without disturbance , under which we prove that signalling and causal influence coincide. The proposed definition has interesting consequences on the analysis of causal networks, and leads to a revision of the notion of neighbourhood for classical cellular automata, clarifying a puzzle regarding their quantisation that apparently makes the neighbourhood larger than the original one.

arXiv:2012.15213•Quantum•Aug 3, 2021•6 citations

Functional Interpretations of Classical Systems

Justus Diller

De Gruyter eBooks•Dec 31, 2010•0 citations

The separation theorem on the classical system

Tsutomu Hosoi

•Mar 19, 1966•12 citations

Spacetime topology from the tomographic histories approach I: `Classical' Case

I. Raptis, Petros Wallden, Romàn R. Zapatrin

The tomographic histories approach is presented. As an inverse problem, we recover in an operational way the effective topology of the extended configuration space of a system. This means that from a series of experiments we get a set of points corresponding to events. The difference between effective and actual topology is drawn. We deduce the topology of the extended configuration space of a ‘classical ’ (i.e. non-relativistic) system, using certain concepts from the consistent histories approach to Quantum Mechanics, such as the notion of a record. A few remarks about the case of a relativistic system, preparing the ground for a forthcoming paper sequel to this, are made in the end. 1 Introduction with Motivational Remarks In the standard formulation of relativity theory, the spacetime topology is a priori fixed by the theorist to that of a continuous manifold; hence, it is not an observable entity. Only the metric structure is traditionally supposed to be dynamically variable. With the exception of Wheeler’s celebrated, but largely heuristic, spacetime foam scenario

•Jun 16, 2005•0 citations

On the Notion of Composite System

Florio M. Ciaglia, Alberto Ibort, Giuseppe Marmo

arXiv:1908.02976•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2019•3 citations

Remarks on Entanglement and Identical Particles

Fabio Benatti, Roberto Floreanini B, Fabio Franchini +1 more

We argue that in the case of identical particles the most natural identification of separability, that is of absence of non-classical correlations, is via the factorization of mean values of commuting observables. It thus follows that separability and entanglement depend both on the state and on the choice of observables and are not absolute notions. We compare this point of view with a recent novel approach to the entanglement of identical particles, which allows for the definition of an entanglement entropy from a suitably defined reduced particle density matrix, without the need of labelling the system constituents. We contrast this figure of merit with the aforementioned lack of an absolute notion of entanglement by considering few paradigmatic examples.

arXiv:1709.05520•Open Systems & Information Dynamics•Sep 1, 2017•25 citations
We study the relation of causal influence between input systems of a reversible evolution and its output systems, in the context of operational probabilistic theories. We analyse two different definitions that are borrowed from the literature on quantum theory—where they are equivalent. One is the notion based on signalling, and the other one is the notion used to define the neighbourhood of a cell in a quantum cellular automaton. The latter definition, that we adopt in the general scenario, turns out to be strictly weaker than the former: it is possible for a system to have causal influence on another one without signalling to it. Remarkably, the counterexample comes from classical theory, where the proposed notion of causal influence determines a redefinition of the neighbourhood of a cell in cellular automata. We stress that, according to our definition, it is impossible anyway to have causal influence in the absence of an interaction, e.g. in a Bell-like scenario. We study various conditions for causal influence, and introduce the feature that we call no interaction without disturbance , under which we prove that signalling and causal influence coincide. The proposed definition has interesting consequences on the analysis of causal networks, and leads to a revision of the notion of neighbourhood for classical cellular automata, clarifying a puzzle regarding their quantisation that apparently makes the neighbourhood larger than the original one.
The tomographic histories approach is presented. As an inverse problem, we recover in an operational way the effective topology of the extended configuration space of a system. This means that from a series of experiments we get a set of points corresponding to events. The difference between effective and actual topology is drawn. We deduce the topology of the extended configuration space of a ‘classical ’ (i.e. non-relativistic) system, using certain concepts from the consistent histories approach to Quantum Mechanics, such as the notion of a record. A few remarks about the case of a relativistic system, preparing the ground for a forthcoming paper sequel to this, are made in the end. 1 Introduction with Motivational Remarks In the standard formulation of relativity theory, the spacetime topology is a priori fixed by the theorist to that of a continuous manifold; hence, it is not an observable entity. Only the metric structure is traditionally supposed to be dynamically variable. With the exception of Wheeler’s celebrated, but largely heuristic, spacetime foam scenario
We argue that in the case of identical particles the most natural identification of separability, that is of absence of non-classical correlations, is via the factorization of mean values of commuting observables. It thus follows that separability and entanglement depend both on the state and on the choice of observables and are not absolute notions. We compare this point of view with a recent novel approach to the entanglement of identical particles, which allows for the definition of an entanglement entropy from a suitably defined reduced particle density matrix, without the need of labelling the system constituents. We contrast this figure of merit with the aforementioned lack of an absolute notion of entanglement by considering few paradigmatic examples.