Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Can Macroscopic Objects Entanglement and Microscopic Objects Entanglement Be Entangled Simultaneously?

Zheng Yi-Fan, Xian-Tong An, Kai-Xia Rao, Yin Huang, Zhi‐Rong Zhong

Published Mar 1, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10773-021-04743-x

Related papers

Entanglement of macroscopic objects

Benjamin P. Stein

Physics Today•Nov 1, 2001•0 citations

Entanglement and Quantum Superposition of a Macroscopic-Macroscopic system

F. De Martini

arXiv:0903.1992•Foundations of Physics•Feb 4, 2010•7 citations

Decoherence bypass of macroscopic superpositions in quantum measurement

Dominique Spehner, Fritz Haake

We study a class of quantum measurement models. A microscopic object is entangled with a macroscopic pointer such that a distinct pointer position is tied to each eigenvalue of the measured object observable. Those different pointer positions mutually decohere under the influence of an environment. Overcoming limitations of previous approaches we (i) cope with initial correlations between pointer and environment by considering them initially in a metastable local thermal equilibrium, (ii) allow for object–pointer entanglement and environment-induced decoherence of distinct pointer readouts to proceed simultaneously, such that mixtures of macroscopically distinct object–pointer product states arise without intervening macroscopic superpositions, and (iii) go beyond the Markovian treatment of decoherence.

arXiv:0709.0469•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Feb 5, 2008•5 citations

Quantum measurements without macroscopic superpositions

Dominique Spehner, Fritz Haake

We study a class of quantum measurement models. A microscopic object is entangled with a macroscopic pointer such that each eigenvalue of the measured object observable is tied up with a specific pointer deflection. Different pointer positions mutually decohere under the influence of a bath. Object-pointer entanglement and decoherence of distinct pointer readouts proceed simultaneously. Mixtures of macroscopically distinct object-pointer states may then arise without intervening macroscopic superpositions. Initially, object and apparatus are statistically independent while the latter has pointer and bath correlated according to a metastable local thermal equilibrium. We obtain explicit results for the object-pointer dynamics with temporal coherence decay in general neither exponential nor Gaussian. The decoherence time does not depend on details of the pointer-bath coupling if it is smaller than the bath correlation time, whereas in the opposite Markov regime the decay depends strongly on whether that coupling is Ohmic or super-Ohmic.

arXiv:0711.0943•Physical Review A•May 20, 2008•14 citations

Quantum Entanglement in Some Physical Systems

Marcin Wieśniak

The summary of the Author's results on Bell inequalities and macroscopic entanglement.

arXiv:0710.1775•Oct 9, 2007•2 citations

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

Amita Dua, Chayannika Singh

In the 17th century, it was thought that motion of macroscopic and microscopic objects could be well-expressed by using the laws of classical mechanics. But towards the end of 19th century, experimental studies showed that classical mechanics failed when applied to microscopic objects. This was mainly because classical mechanics did not take into account the concept of de-Broglie’s dual nature of matter and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Also, classical mechanics does not put any restrictions on the values of dynamical properties (likes position, momentum, energy etc.) calculated for microscopic object. According to classical mechanics, microscopic objects can have any value of dynamical properties, ( exact, large or small is permissible). Also any number of properties can be calculated simultaneously for a system.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 15, 2024•11 citations
We study a class of quantum measurement models. A microscopic object is entangled with a macroscopic pointer such that a distinct pointer position is tied to each eigenvalue of the measured object observable. Those different pointer positions mutually decohere under the influence of an environment. Overcoming limitations of previous approaches we (i) cope with initial correlations between pointer and environment by considering them initially in a metastable local thermal equilibrium, (ii) allow for object–pointer entanglement and environment-induced decoherence of distinct pointer readouts to proceed simultaneously, such that mixtures of macroscopically distinct object–pointer product states arise without intervening macroscopic superpositions, and (iii) go beyond the Markovian treatment of decoherence.
We study a class of quantum measurement models. A microscopic object is entangled with a macroscopic pointer such that each eigenvalue of the measured object observable is tied up with a specific pointer deflection. Different pointer positions mutually decohere under the influence of a bath. Object-pointer entanglement and decoherence of distinct pointer readouts proceed simultaneously. Mixtures of macroscopically distinct object-pointer states may then arise without intervening macroscopic superpositions. Initially, object and apparatus are statistically independent while the latter has pointer and bath correlated according to a metastable local thermal equilibrium. We obtain explicit results for the object-pointer dynamics with temporal coherence decay in general neither exponential nor Gaussian. The decoherence time does not depend on details of the pointer-bath coupling if it is smaller than the bath correlation time, whereas in the opposite Markov regime the decay depends strongly on whether that coupling is Ohmic or super-Ohmic.
In the 17th century, it was thought that motion of macroscopic and microscopic objects could be well-expressed by using the laws of classical mechanics. But towards the end of 19th century, experimental studies showed that classical mechanics failed when applied to microscopic objects. This was mainly because classical mechanics did not take into account the concept of de-Broglie’s dual nature of matter and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Also, classical mechanics does not put any restrictions on the values of dynamical properties (likes position, momentum, energy etc.) calculated for microscopic object. According to classical mechanics, microscopic objects can have any value of dynamical properties, ( exact, large or small is permissible). Also any number of properties can be calculated simultaneously for a system.