Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Closure structures and orthocomplementation of state-property-systems of contextual systems.

Bart D’Hooghe

Published Jan 1, 2010• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

On the Orthocomplementation of State–Property–Systems of Contextual Systems

Bart D’Hooghe

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jun 29, 2010•3 citations

Orthocomplementation and Compound Systems

Boris Ischi

arXiv:quant-ph/0410085•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 2005•2 citations

State Property Systems and Closure Spaces: A Study of Categorical Equivalence

Diederik Aerts, Eva Colebunders, Ann Van Der Voorde +1 more

arXiv:quant-ph/0105108•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 1999•64 citations

State Property Systems of Contextual Quantumlike Models.

Bart D’Hooghe

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

ON THE ORTHOCOMPLEMENTATION OF STATE-PROPERTY-SYSTEMS OF CONTEXTUAL SYSTEMS

Bart D’Hooghe

•Mar 5, 2014•0 citations

Bell Non-Closure and the Law of Declared Authority: A Structural Correspondence

Stacy B. Gildenston, Pyrate Ruby Passell

Bell’s theorem eliminates the class of local hidden-variable models under the joint assumptions of locality and realism. The Law of Declared Authority establishes that legitimate action in decision systems cannot be derived from internal system state alone; an external authority declaration is required. This paper presents a structural correspondence between these two non-closure results. It identifies a shared formal structure in which meaningful properties are not closed over internal system state and instead depend on external contextual parameters. The claim is strictly structural and does not assert physical or ontological equivalence across domains.

•Feb 25, 2026•0 citations
Bell’s theorem eliminates the class of local hidden-variable models under the joint assumptions of locality and realism. The Law of Declared Authority establishes that legitimate action in decision systems cannot be derived from internal system state alone; an external authority declaration is required. This paper presents a structural correspondence between these two non-closure results. It identifies a shared formal structure in which meaningful properties are not closed over internal system state and instead depend on external contextual parameters. The claim is strictly structural and does not assert physical or ontological equivalence across domains.