Quantum computation is by far the most powerful computational model allowed by the laws of physics. By carefully manipulating microscopic systems governed by quantum mechanics, one can efficiently solve computational problems that may be classically intractable; on the contrary, such speed-ups are rarely possible without the help of classical computation, since most quantum algorithms heavily rely on subroutines that are purely classical. A better understanding of the relationship between classical and quantum computation is indispensable, in particular in an era where the first quantum device exceeding classical computational power is within reach. In the first part of the thesis, we study some differences between classical and quantum computation. We first show that quantum cryptographic hashing is maximally resilient against classical leakage, a property beyond reach for any classical hash function. Next, we consider the limitation of strong (amplitude-wise) simulation of quantum computation. We prove an unconditional and explicit complexity lower bound for a category of simulations called monotone strong simulation and further prove conditional complexity lower bounds for general strong simulation techniques. Both results indicate that strong simulation is fundamentally unscalable. In the second part of the thesis, we propose classical algorithms that facilitate quantum computing. We propose a new classical algorithm for the synthesis of a quantum algorithm paradigm called quantum signal processing. Empirically, our algorithm demonstrates numerical stability and acceleration of more than one magnitude compared to state-of-the-art algorithms. Finally, we propose a randomized algorithm for transversally switching between arbitrary stabilizer quantum error-correcting codes. It has the property of preserving the code distance and thus might prove useful for designing fault-tolerant code-switching schemes.
Quantum computation is by far the most powerful computational model allowed by the laws of physics. By carefully manipulating microscopic systems governed by quantum mechanics, one can efficiently solve computational problems that may be classically intractable; on the contrary, such speed-ups are rarely possible without the help of classical computation, since most quantum algorithms heavily rely on subroutines that are purely classical. A better understanding of the relationship between classical and quantum computation is indispensable, in particular in an era where the first quantum device exceeding classical computational power is within reach. In the first part of the thesis, we study some differences between classical and quantum computation. We first show that quantum cryptographic hashing is maximally resilient against classical leakage, a property beyond reach for any classical hash function. Next, we consider the limitation of strong (amplitude-wise) simulation of quantum computation. We prove an unconditional and explicit complexity lower bound for a category of simulations called monotone strong simulation and further prove conditional complexity lower bounds for general strong simulation techniques. Both results indicate that strong simulation is fundamentally unscalable. In the second part of the thesis, we propose classical algorithms that facilitate quantum computing. We propose a new classical algorithm for the synthesis of a quantum algorithm paradigm called quantum signal processing. Empirically, our algorithm demonstrates numerical stability and acceleration of more than one magnitude compared to state-of-the-art algorithms. Finally, we propose a randomized algorithm for transversally switching between arbitrary stabilizer quantum error-correcting codes. It has the property of preserving the code distance and thus might prove useful for designing fault-tolerant code-switching schemes.
Quantum computers have the potential to push the limits of computation in areas such as quantum chemistry, cryptography, optimization, and machine learning. Even though many quantum algorithms show asymptotic improvement compared to classical ones, the overhead of running quantum computers limits when quantum computing becomes useful. Thus, by optimizing components of quantum algorithms, we can bring the regime of quantum advantage closer. My work focuses on developing efficient subroutines for quantum computation. I focus specifically on algorithms for scalable, fault-tolerant quantum computers. While it is possible that even noisy quantum computers can outperform classical ones for specific tasks, high-depth and therefore fault-tolerance is likely required for most applications. In this thesis, I introduce three sets of techniques that can be used by themselves or as subroutines in other algorithms. The first components are coherent versions of classical sort and shuffle. We require that a quantum shuffle prepares a uniform superposition over all permutations of a sequence. The quantum sort is used within the shuffle and as well as in the next algorithm in this thesis. The quantum shuffle is an essential part of state preparation for quantum chemistry computation in first quantization. Second, I review the progress of Hamiltonian simulations and give a new algorithm for simulating time-dependent Hamiltonians. This algorithm scales polylogarithmic in the inverse error, and the query complexity does not depend on the derivatives of the Hamiltonian. A time-dependent Hamiltonian simulation was recently used for interaction picture simulation with applications to quantum chemistry. Next, I present a fully quantum Boltzmann machine. I show that our algorithm can train on quantum data and learn a classical description of quantum states. This type of machine learning can be used for tomography, Hamiltonian learning, and approximate quantum cloning.
The study of quantum computations that can be simulated efficiently classically is of interest for numerous reasons. On a fundamental level, such an investigation sheds light on the intrinsic computational power that is harnessed in quantum mechanics as compared to classical physics. More practically, understanding which quantum computations do not offer any speed-ups over classical computation provides insights in where (not) to look for novel quantum algorithmic primitives. On the other hand, classical simulation of many-body systems is a challenging task, as the dimension of the Hilbert space scales with the number of particles. Therefore, to understand the properties of the systems, suitable approximation methods need to be employed. The lectures will be divided into two parts. In the first part we discuss classical simulation of quantum computation from several perspectives. We review a number of well-known examples of classically simulatable quantum computations, such as the Gottesman-Knill theorem, matchgate simulation and tensor contraction methods. We further discuss simulation methods that are centred on classical sampling methods (‘weak simulation’), and illustrate how these techniques outperform methods that rely on the exact computation of measurement probabilities (‘strong simulation’). The second part focuses on "Entanglement and variational wavefunctions in quantum many body physics". We review the idea of entanglement in quantum many-body systems and how it helps us to understand the success of numerical renormalization group methods. In particular we will discuss a few variational wave-function based methods for simulating strongly correlated quantum systems, which include (1) matrix product states (2) multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz (3) projected entangled pair states and (4) continuous matrix product states for quantum field theories.
Quantum computing may solve selected classes of problems more efficiently than classical computers, with applications in areas such as cryptography, chemistry, and optimization. However, current quantum systems remain limited in scale and reliability and depend on substantial classical-computing support. This thesis investigates this challenge in two complementary contexts: classical simulation, where efficient computation enables the exploration of larger quantum systems; and quantum error correction, where efficient real-time decoding enables more reliable quantum operation.The first part examines the classical simulation of quantum computers, focusing on the computational and memory challenges that limit its scalability. It organizes the field across device, gate, and algorithmic levels, with particular attention to state-vector, path-based, hybrid, and tensor-based methods. The survey relates their computation, memory, data-movement, and communication bottlenecks to acceleration approaches for CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, and distributed systems. It further highlights recurring optimization strategies, including reduced precision, data compression, parallel execution, improved memory locality, specialized matrix units, and reconfigurable hardware, providing a common framework for current techniques and future acceleration opportunities.The second part addresses the real-time classical processing required for quantum error correction. Starting from a high-accuracy Graph Neural Network surface-code decoder, it applies algorithm-hardware co-design through hardware-guided pruning and retraining, input-graph filtering, quantization, and a custom FPGA architecture. For code distances up to d=7, the resulting designs satisfy both max-latency and average-latency decoding requirements while reducing the logical error rate by 13% and 40%, respectively, compared with the evaluated Minimum Weight Perfect Matching baseline.Together, these works show how classical computer-architecture techniques can support quantum computing from scalable exploration through simulation to reliable operation through real-time error correction.
Quantum computing devices can solve problems that are infeasible for classical computers. While rigorously proving speedups over existing classical algorithms demonstrates the usefulness of quantum computers, analyzing the limits on efficient processes for computational tasks allows us to better understand the power of quantum computation. Indeed, hard problems for quantum computers also enable useful cryptographic applications. In this dissertation, we aim to understand the limits on efficient quantum computation and base applications on hard problems for quantum computers. We consider models in which a classical machine can leverage the power of a quantum device, which may be affected by noise or behave adversarially. We present protocols and tools for detecting errors in a quantum machine and estimate how serious the deviation is. We construct a non-interactive protocol that enables a purely classical party to delegate any quantum computation to an untrusted quantum prover. In the setting of error-prone quantum hardware, we employ formal methods to construct a logical system for reasoning about the robustness of a quantum algorithm design. We also study the limits of ideal quantum computers for computational tasks and give asymptotically optimal algorithms. In particular, we give quantum algorithms which provide speedups for the polynomial interpolation problem and show their optimality. Finally, we study the performance of quantum algorithms that learn properties of a matrix using queries that return its action on an input vector. In particular, we show that for various linear algebra problems, there is no quantum speedup, while for some problems, exponential speedups can be achieved.
Quantum computing is an emerging technology that has the potential to change the perspectives and applications of computing in general. A wide range of applications are enabled: from faster algorithmic solutions of classically still difficult problems to theoretically more secure communication protocols. A quantum computer uses the quantum mechanical effects of particles or particle-like systems, and a major similarity between quantum and classical computers consists of both being abstracted as information processing machines. Whereas a classical computer operates on classical digital information, the quantum computer processes quantum information, which shares similarities with analog signals. One of the central differences between the two types of information is that classical information is more fault-tolerant when compared to its quantum counterpart. Faults are the result of the quantum systems being interfered by external noise, but during the last decades quantum error correction codes (QECC) were proposed as methods to reduce the effect of noise. Reliable quantum circuits are the result of designing circuits that operate directly on encoded quantum information, but the circuit’s reliability is also increased by supplemental redundancies, such as sub-circuit repetitions. Reliable quantum circuits have not been widely used, and one of the major obstacles is their vast associated resource overhead, but recent quantum computing architectures show promising scalabilities. Consequently the number of particles used for computing can be more easily increased, and that the classical control hardware (inherent for quantum computation) is also more reliable. Reliable quantum circuits haev been investigated for almost as long as general quantum computing, but their limited adoption (until recently) has not generated enough interest into their systematic design. The continuously increasing practical relevance of reliability motivates the present thesis to investigate some of the first answers to questions related to the background and the methods forming a reliable quantum circuit design stack. The specifics of quantum circuits are analysed from two perspectives: their probabilistic behaviour and their topological properties when a particular class of QECCs are used. The quantum phenomena, such as entanglement and superposition, are the computational resources used for designing quantum circuits. The discrete nature of classical information is missing for quantum information. An arbitrary quantum system can be in an infinite number of states, which are linear combinations of an exponential number of basis states. Any nontrivial linear combination of more than one basis states is called a state superposition. The effect of superpositions becomes evident when the state of the system is inferred (measured), as measurements are probabilistic with respect to their output: a nontrivial state superposition will collapse to one of the component basis states, and the measurement result is known exactly only after the measurement. A quantum system is, in general, composed from identical subsystems, meaning that a quantum computer (the complete system) operates on multiple similar particles (subsystems). Entanglement expresses the impossibility of separating the state of the subsystems from the state of the complete system: the nontrivial interactions between the subsystems result into a single indivisible state. Entanglement is an additional source of probabilistic behaviour: by measuring the state of a subsystem, the states of the unmeasured subsystems will probabilistically collapse to states from a well defined set of possible states. Superposition and entanglement are the building blocks of quantum information teleportation protocols, which in turn are used in state-of-the-art fault-tolerant quantum computing architectures. Information teleportation implies that the state of a subsystem is moved to a second subsystem without copying any information during the process. The probabilistic approach towards the design of quantum circuits is initiated by the extension of classical test and diagnosis methods. Quantum circuits are modelled similarly to classical circuits by defining gate-lists, and missing quantum gates are modelled by the single missing gate fault. The probabilistic approaches towards quantum circuits are facilitated by comparing these to stochastic circuits, which are a particular type of classical digital circuits. Stochastic circuits can be considered an emulation of analogue computing using digital components. A first proposed design method, based on the direct comparison, is the simulation of quantum circuits using stochastic circuits by mapping each quantum gate to a stochastic computing sub-circuit. The resulting stochastic circuit is compiled and simulated on FPGAs. The obtained results are encouraging and illustrate the capabilities of the proposed simulation technique. However, the exponential number of possible quantum basis states was translated into an exponential number of stochastic computing elements. A second contribution of the thesis is the proposal of test and diagnosis methods for both stochastic and quantum circuits. Existing verification (tomographic) methods of quantum circuits were targeting the reconstruction of the gate-lists. The repeated execution of the quantum circuit was followed by different but specific measurement at the circuit outputs. The similarities between stochastic and quantum circuits motivated the proposal of test and diagnosis methods that use a restricted set of measurement types, which minimise the number of circuit executions. The obtained simulation results show that the proposed validation methods improve the feasibility of quantum circuit tomography for small and medium size circuits. A third contribution of the thesis is the algorithmic formalisation of a problem encountered in teleportation-based quantum computing architectures. The teleportation results are probabilistic and require corrections represented as quantum gates from a particular set. However, there are known commutation properties of these gates with the gates used in the circuit. The corrections are not applied as dynamic gate insertions (during the circuit’s execution) into the gate-lists, but their effect is tracked through the circuit, and the corrections are applied only at circuit outputs. The simulation results show that the algorithmic solution is applicable for very large quantum circuits. Topological quantum computing (TQC) is based on a class of fault-tolerant quantum circuits that use the surface code as the underlying QECC. Quantum information is encoded in lattice-like structures and error protection is enabled by the topological properties of the lattice. The 3D structure of the lattice allows TQC computations to be visualised similarly to knot diagrams. Logical information is abstracted as strands and strand interactions (braids) represent logical quantum gates. Therefore, TQC circuits are abstracted using a geometrical description, which allows circuit input-output transformations (correlations) to be represented as geometric sub-structures. TQC design methods were not investigated prior to this work, and the thesis introduces the topological computational model by first analysing the necessary concepts. The proposed TQC design stack follows a top-down approach: an arbitrary quantum circuit is decomposed into the TQC supported gate set; the resulting circuit is mapped to a lattice of appropriate dimensions; relevant resulting topological properties are extracted and expressed using graphs and Boolean formulas. Both circuit representations are novel and applicable to TQC circuit synthesis and validation. Moreover, the Boolean formalism is broadened into a formal mechanism for proving circuit correctness. The thesis introduces TQC circuit synthesis, which is based on a novel logical gate geometric description, whose formal correctness is demonstrated. Two synthesis methods are designed, and both use a general planar representation of the circuit. Initial simulation results demonstrate the practicality and performance of the methods. An additional group of proposed design methods solves the problem of automatic correlation construction. The methods use validity criteria which were introduced and analysed beforehand in the thesis. Input-output correlations existing in the circuit are inferred using both the graph and the Boolean representation. The thesis extends the TQC state-of-the-art by recognising the importance of correlations in the validation process: correlation construction is used as a sub-routine for TQC circuit validation. The presented cross-layer validation procedure is useful when investigating both the QECC and the circuit, while a second proposed method is QECC-independent. Both methods are scalable and applicable even to very large circuits. The thesis completes with the analysis of TQC circuit identities, where the developed Boolean formalism is used. The proofs of former known circuit identities were either missing or complex, and the presented approach reduces the length of the proofs and represents a first step towards standardising them. A new identity is developed and detailed during the process of illustrating the known circuit identities. Reliable quantum circuits are a necessity for quantum computing to become reality, and specialised design methods are required to support the quest for scalable quantum computers. This thesis used a twofold approach towards this target: firstly by focusing on the probabilistic behaviour of quantum circuits, and secondly by considering the requirements of a promising quantum computing architecture, namely TQC. Both approaches resulted in a set of design methods enabling the investigation of reliable quantum circuits. The thesis contributes with the proposal of a new quantum simulation technique, no
The simulation of quantum physical systems is expected to be an important application for quantum computers. The work presented in this dissertation aims to improve the resource requirements of quantum computers for solving simulation problems, by providing both novel quantum algorithms and improved implementations of existing ones. I present three main results that cover diverse aspects of simulation including equilibrium physics, the preparation of useful quantum states, and simulations based on classical stochastic processes. The results rely on established quantum algorithms and other recent techniques which I review. My first original contribution is a new quantum algorithm to sample from the thermal Gibbs state of quantum Hamiltonians. The complexity of this algorithm has an exponentially improved dependence on precision compared to an earlier quantum algorithm, and also provides polynomial improvements in other parameters. My second contribution is an improved algorithm to implement reflections about the eigenstates of unitary operators and Hamiltonians, an operation that can be used to prepare ground states of many-body Hamiltonians by quantum amplitude amplification. The improved algorithm for implementing reflections significantly reduces the number of ancilla qubits required over earlier implementations. The improvement relies in part on a novel quantum algorithm for efficiently preparing states with Gaussian-like amplitudes, which may have broad applications. I also prove a lower bound for implementing reflections, which shows that our algorithm is almost optimal. My third and final contribution regards quantum algorithms for classical stochastic processes, which are of importance in statistical physics. I present a quantum algorithm that estimates the average running time of a stochastic process, and provides a quadratic speed-up over a comparable classical algorithm.