Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Bell's inequality in terms of probabilities

Thomas V Marcella

Published Mar 15, 2021• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Non-Kolmogorov probability models and modified Bell’s inequality

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We analyze the proof of Bell’s inequality and demonstrate that this inequality is related to one particular model of probability theory, namely Kolmogorov measure-theoretical axiomatics from 1933. We found a (numerical) statistical correction to Bell’s inequality. Such an additional term εφ on the right-hand side of Bell’s inequality can be considered as a probability invariant of a quantum state φ. This is a measure of nonreproducibility of hidden variables in different runs of experiments. Experiments to verify Bell’s inequality can be considered as just experiments to estimate the constant εφ. It seems that Bell’s inequality could not be used as a crucial reason to deny local realism. We consider deterministic as well as stochastic hidden variables models.

arXiv:quant-ph/0003017•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 2000•50 citations

Bell’s Inequality for Conditional Probabilities

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2009•2 citations

Generalized structure of Bell inequalities for bipartite arbitrary-dimensional systems

Seungwoo Lee, Yong Wook Cheong, Jinhyoung Lee

We propose a generalized structure of Bell inequalities for arbitrary $d$-dimensional bipartite systems, which includes the existing two types of Bell inequalities introduced by Collins et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002)] and Son et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 060406 (2006)]. We analyze Bell inequalities in terms of correlation functions and joint probabilities, and show that the coefficients of correlation functions and those of joint probabilities are in Fourier transform relations. We finally show that the coefficients in the generalized structure determine the characteristics of quantum violation and tightness.

arXiv:quant-ph/0512176•Physical Review A•Sep 7, 2007•18 citations

On the Applicability of Bell's Inequality

Pierre A. Millette

Progress in physics•Jul 1, 2016•0 citations

Bell's inequality

Keith Hannabuss

Nature•Oct 3, 1991•6 citations

Bell-Type Inequalities in Fuzzy Probability Calculus

Jarosław Pykacz

Bell-type inequalities, used in mathematical physics as a criterion to check whether a physical situation allows description in terms of classical (Kolmogorovian) or quantum probability calculus are applied to various fuzzy probability models. It occurs that the standard set of Bell-type inequalities does not allow to distinguish Kolmogorovian probabilities from fuzzy probabilities based on the most frequently used Zadeh intersection or probabilistic intersection, but it allows to distinguish all these models from fuzzy probability models based on Giles (Łukasiewicz) intersection. It is proved that if we use fuzzy set intersections pointwisely generated by Frank's fundamental triangular norms Ts(x,y), then the borderline between fuzzy probability models that can be distinguished from Kolmogorovian ones and these fuzzy probability models that cannot be distinguished is for .

International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems•Apr 1, 2001•18 citations
We analyze the proof of Bell’s inequality and demonstrate that this inequality is related to one particular model of probability theory, namely Kolmogorov measure-theoretical axiomatics from 1933. We found a (numerical) statistical correction to Bell’s inequality. Such an additional term εφ on the right-hand side of Bell’s inequality can be considered as a probability invariant of a quantum state φ. This is a measure of nonreproducibility of hidden variables in different runs of experiments. Experiments to verify Bell’s inequality can be considered as just experiments to estimate the constant εφ. It seems that Bell’s inequality could not be used as a crucial reason to deny local realism. We consider deterministic as well as stochastic hidden variables models.
We propose a generalized structure of Bell inequalities for arbitrary ddd-dimensional bipartite systems, which includes the existing two types of Bell inequalities introduced by Collins et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002)] and Son et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 060406 (2006)]. We analyze Bell inequalities in terms of correlation functions and joint probabilities, and show that the coefficients of correlation functions and those of joint probabilities are in Fourier transform relations. We finally show that the coefficients in the generalized structure determine the characteristics of quantum violation and tightness.
Bell-type inequalities, used in mathematical physics as a criterion to check whether a physical situation allows description in terms of classical (Kolmogorovian) or quantum probability calculus are applied to various fuzzy probability models. It occurs that the standard set of Bell-type inequalities does not allow to distinguish Kolmogorovian probabilities from fuzzy probabilities based on the most frequently used Zadeh intersection or probabilistic intersection, but it allows to distinguish all these models from fuzzy probability models based on Giles (Łukasiewicz) intersection. It is proved that if we use fuzzy set intersections pointwisely generated by Frank's fundamental triangular norms Ts(x,y), then the borderline between fuzzy probability models that can be distinguished from Kolmogorovian ones and these fuzzy probability models that cannot be distinguished is for .