Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The physical origin of the Einstein Podolsky Rosen experiment

Diederik Aerts

Published Jan 1, 1983• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The Physical Origin of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox

Dirk Aerts

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1985•22 citations

THE FHYSICAL ORIGIN OF THE EOOTEIN-roOOISKY-RC6EN PARAOOX

Diederik Aerts, Theoretische Natuurkunde

We shOll that quantum mechanics cannot describe separated physical systems and that this incapacity is at the origin of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox. We refer to a more general theory where separated systems can be des­ cribed. We analyse again the EPR problen and the EPR experiments in the li/itlt of this result. We give an exarple of a rracroscopic physical system that violates Bell inequalities and shOll that this system is a good analogy to the two par­ ticles in the singlet spin state used for the EPR experiments.

•Jan 1, 1985•0 citations

Discovery of the Solution to the "Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox"

Roman Schnabel

In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (EPR) published a thought experiment that is entirely correct, has been demonstrated in real experiments, and is now the most famous in quantum physics. Their pioneering work described, for the first time, quantum correlations and can be regarded as a very early glimpse into today's 'deep' quantum technologies, by which I mean those that enhance functionality by making use of quantum correlations. However, their work also contains a paradox that Erwin Schroedinger had already recognised as such in 1935 and which has since been cemented by the so-called Bell experiments. Here, I am now able to pinpoint the origin of the paradox within the chain of reasoning, which ultimately resolves the paradox.

quant-pharXiv:2604.09826•Apr 14, 2026•0 citations

The physics of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

B. H. Kellett

Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 1977•6 citations

Krótka (pre)historia argumentu EPR

Tadeusz Pabjan

The 1935 thought experiment of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen is one of the most important episodes in the history of the dispute about the correct interpretation of quantum mechanics. The present paper deals with the origin of the EPR paper and discusses some other thought experiments that preceded the formulation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument. Special attention is paid to the evolution of a simply photon-box experiment, which was devised by Einstein in 1930 and then modified by him several times before 1935. It is argued that the scheme of the original EPR argument is in fact contained in these few seminal experiments.

Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce)•Dec 20, 2010•0 citations

Casual Interpretation of the Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen Experiment

David Böhm

•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations
We shOll that quantum mechanics cannot describe separated physical systems and that this incapacity is at the origin of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox. We refer to a more general theory where separated systems can be des­ cribed. We analyse again the EPR problen and the EPR experiments in the li/itlt of this result. We give an exarple of a rracroscopic physical system that violates Bell inequalities and shOll that this system is a good analogy to the two par­ ticles in the singlet spin state used for the EPR experiments.
In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (EPR) published a thought experiment that is entirely correct, has been demonstrated in real experiments, and is now the most famous in quantum physics. Their pioneering work described, for the first time, quantum correlations and can be regarded as a very early glimpse into today's 'deep' quantum technologies, by which I mean those that enhance functionality by making use of quantum correlations. However, their work also contains a paradox that Erwin Schroedinger had already recognised as such in 1935 and which has since been cemented by the so-called Bell experiments. Here, I am now able to pinpoint the origin of the paradox within the chain of reasoning, which ultimately resolves the paradox.
The 1935 thought experiment of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen is one of the most important episodes in the history of the dispute about the correct interpretation of quantum mechanics. The present paper deals with the origin of the EPR paper and discusses some other thought experiments that preceded the formulation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument. Special attention is paid to the evolution of a simply photon-box experiment, which was devised by Einstein in 1930 and then modified by him several times before 1935. It is argued that the scheme of the original EPR argument is in fact contained in these few seminal experiments.