Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in physics

Implications of the Quantumness

Sintayehu Tesfa

Published Jan 1, 2020• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-62348-7_10

Related papers

Quantum Implications

Gordon McCabe, Carfax Publishing

Cogito•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Quantum Implication

Leopoldo Román, Rita E. Zuazua

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 1999•9 citations

The meaning of quantumness

Daniel Cossins

The New Scientist•Apr 1, 2025•0 citations

Quantum implications in orthomodular posets

Kadi̇r Emi̇r, Jan Paseka

We show that, for every orthogonal lub-complete poset P, we can introduce multiple-valued implications sharing properties with quantum implications presented for orthomodular lattices by Kalmbach. We call them classical implication, Kalmbach implication, non-tolens implication, Dishkant implication and Sasaki implication. If the classical implication satisfies the order property, then the corresponding orthologic becomes classical and vice versa. If the Kalmbach or non-tolens or Dishkant or Sasaki implication meets the order property, then the corresponding orthologic becomes quantum and vice versa. A related result for the modus ponens rule is obtained.

arXiv:2311.12191•Nov 20, 2023•1 citation

QUANTUM CONSEQUENCES

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Feb 1, 2006•0 citations

Beyond Encryption: A Critical Examination of the Social and Ethical Impacts of Quantum Steganography

Kaustuv Dey, Bilal Ahmed Reshi, Vijay Kumar

Research focusing on quantum steganography (QS) is largely centered on its technical implementation as an emerging field. This emphasis on practical discussion leaves a significant gap in the literature on QS, as researchers neglect to discuss the broader societal and ethical implications of a new technology. The vast majority of technical studies often do not entertain the issue of relevant ‘dual-use’ implications of QS, or other aspects of functionality that may enable greater levels of personal privacy while also enabling covert communications that circumvent current security/monitoring mechanisms. This paper fills the gap in the literature by providing a broad evaluation of the implications to society of QS. When discussing implications, this study considers varied implications and rather than solely utilitarian or functional analysis, the paper considers various implications of the technology on individual privacy, government monitoring, digital autonomy, and access/disadvantage to information security. The principal contribution to the paper is an analysis of the causal implications. This paper also discusses the anticipated safety/risk implications to national security, intellectual property rights, and civil liberties. Also, this study discusses the governance implications created by this new technology, and provides mitigation options. By evaluating the possible implications to privacy, surveillance, autonomy and governance, the paper proposes a much needed ethical discussion prior to fabric level adoption.

Procedia Computer Science•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
We show that, for every orthogonal lub-complete poset P, we can introduce multiple-valued implications sharing properties with quantum implications presented for orthomodular lattices by Kalmbach. We call them classical implication, Kalmbach implication, non-tolens implication, Dishkant implication and Sasaki implication. If the classical implication satisfies the order property, then the corresponding orthologic becomes classical and vice versa. If the Kalmbach or non-tolens or Dishkant or Sasaki implication meets the order property, then the corresponding orthologic becomes quantum and vice versa. A related result for the modus ponens rule is obtained.
Research focusing on quantum steganography (QS) is largely centered on its technical implementation as an emerging field. This emphasis on practical discussion leaves a significant gap in the literature on QS, as researchers neglect to discuss the broader societal and ethical implications of a new technology. The vast majority of technical studies often do not entertain the issue of relevant ‘dual-use’ implications of QS, or other aspects of functionality that may enable greater levels of personal privacy while also enabling covert communications that circumvent current security/monitoring mechanisms. This paper fills the gap in the literature by providing a broad evaluation of the implications to society of QS. When discussing implications, this study considers varied implications and rather than solely utilitarian or functional analysis, the paper considers various implications of the technology on individual privacy, government monitoring, digital autonomy, and access/disadvantage to information security. The principal contribution to the paper is an analysis of the causal implications. This paper also discusses the anticipated safety/risk implications to national security, intellectual property rights, and civil liberties. Also, this study discusses the governance implications created by this new technology, and provides mitigation options. By evaluating the possible implications to privacy, surveillance, autonomy and governance, the paper proposes a much needed ethical discussion prior to fabric level adoption.