Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

SpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology

Entanglement of Thought

Alеxander Raikov

Published Jan 1, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-981-33-6750-0_13

Related papers

Two Quantum Entangled Cheshire Cats

Jie Zhou, L. C. Kwek, Jing‐Ling Chen

Quantum entanglement serves as an important resource for quantum processing. In the original thought experiment of the Quantum Cheshire Cat, the physical properties of the cat (state) can be decoupled from its quantum entities. How do quantum entanglement and weak values affect such thought experiment? Here, we conceive a new thought experiment that exploits quantum entanglement with weak (value) measurement. Specifically, we ask: can two entangled particles exchange physical and quantum properties? We answer the question in the affirmative.

arXiv:2303.17081•Mar 30, 2023•1 citation

Talking entanglement

Rachel Pei Chin Won

Nature Photonics•Aug 28, 2009•0 citations

Discovery of entanglement generation by elastic collision to realise the original Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought experiment

Roman Schnabel

Abstract The amazing quantum effect of ‘entanglement’ was discovered in the 1935 thought experiment by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (‘EPR’)1. The ensuing research opened up fundamental questions and led to experiments that proved that quantum theory cannot be completed by local hidden variables2–4. Remarkably, EPR did not discuss how to create the entanglement in their thought experiment. Here I add this part. What is required in the original EPR thought experiment is a simple elastic particle collision, an unbalanced mass ratio of e.g. 1:3 and initial states that are position and momentum squeezed, respectively. In the limiting case of infinite squeeze factors, the measurement of the position or momentum of one particle allows an absolutely precise conclusion to be drawn about the value of the same quantity of the other particle. The EPR idea has never been tested in this way. I outline a way to do this.

arXiv:2505.09721•npj Quantum Information•May 14, 2025•2 citations

Entanglement

Series on the foundations of natural science and technology•Nov 1, 2025•0 citations

Entanglement Explained by Sequencing Satisfies Lack of Trajectory and The Holographic Principle

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

The implications of entanglement have scared many, but if we use all we understand about existence sequencing is probably the answer given probable experiments that we should have the technology to do within the next 5 years. The simpler the easier to understand. This paper is in the tradition of thought experiments, not all have access for modern technology, a thought of the mind, given that we are further introducing algorithms into not only physics but life in general, sequencing is merely an algorithm.

JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN PHYSICS•Jun 30, 2018•0 citations

Entanglement

John P. Ralston

Morgan & Claypool Publishers eBooks•Apr 1, 2018•0 citations
Quantum entanglement serves as an important resource for quantum processing. In the original thought experiment of the Quantum Cheshire Cat, the physical properties of the cat (state) can be decoupled from its quantum entities. How do quantum entanglement and weak values affect such thought experiment? Here, we conceive a new thought experiment that exploits quantum entanglement with weak (value) measurement. Specifically, we ask: can two entangled particles exchange physical and quantum properties? We answer the question in the affirmative.
Abstract The amazing quantum effect of ‘entanglement’ was discovered in the 1935 thought experiment by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (‘EPR’)1. The ensuing research opened up fundamental questions and led to experiments that proved that quantum theory cannot be completed by local hidden variables2–4. Remarkably, EPR did not discuss how to create the entanglement in their thought experiment. Here I add this part. What is required in the original EPR thought experiment is a simple elastic particle collision, an unbalanced mass ratio of e.g. 1:3 and initial states that are position and momentum squeezed, respectively. In the limiting case of infinite squeeze factors, the measurement of the position or momentum of one particle allows an absolutely precise conclusion to be drawn about the value of the same quantity of the other particle. The EPR idea has never been tested in this way. I outline a way to do this.
The implications of entanglement have scared many, but if we use all we understand about existence sequencing is probably the answer given probable experiments that we should have the technology to do within the next 5 years. The simpler the easier to understand. This paper is in the tradition of thought experiments, not all have access for modern technology, a thought of the mind, given that we are further introducing algorithms into not only physics but life in general, sequencing is merely an algorithm.