In previous studies, It is said that the interaction of elementary particles is caused by the absorption and emission of virtual particles as quantum fluctuations that exist under the limitation of the uncertainty principle. For example, it is said that electromagnetic interaction is generated by the exchange of virtual photons by charged particles, and Coulomb force is generated. In this paper, we suppose that the possibility of the existence of interacting ”real” particles themselves, rather than the mathematically assumed particles called ”virtual particles”, is distributed at all points in space by the uncertainty principle. And then, we try to describe how the interaction occurs due to the ”collision of possibility of existence of particle” of the particles. Also, using the semiclassical method,and heat field theory.under the condition that the density displayed by the distribution function is preserved. In this way, we discuss the transformation of quantum orbitals into systems that can be described as classical trajectory.
In previous studies, It is said that the interaction of elementary particles is caused by the absorption and emission of virtual particles as quantum fluctuations that exist under the limitation of the uncertainty principle. For example, it is said that electromagnetic interaction is generated by the exchange of virtual photons by charged particles, and Coulomb force is generated. In this paper, we suppose that the possibility of the existence of interacting ”real” particles themselves, rather than the mathematically assumed particles called ”virtual particles”, is distributed at all points in space by the uncertainty principle. And then, we try to describe how the interaction occurs due to the ”collision of possibility of existence of particle” of the particles. Also, using the semiclassical method,and heat field theory.under the condition that the density displayed by the distribution function is preserved. In this way, we discuss the transformation of quantum orbitals into systems that can be described as classical trajectory.
Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) has been extremely successful inits predictive capability for atomic phenomena. Thus the greatest hope for any alternative view is solely to mimic the predictive capability of quantum mechanics (QM), and perhaps its usefulness will lie in gaining a better understanding of microscopic phenomena. Many “paradoxes” and problematic situations emerge in QED. To combat the QED problems, the field of Stochastics Electrodynamics (SE) emerged, wherein a random “zero point radiation” is assumed to fill all of space in an attmept to explain quantum phenomena, without some of the paradoxical concerns. SE, however, has greater failings. One is that the electromagnetic field energy must be infinit eto work. We have examined a deterministic side branch of SE, “self field” electrodynamics, which may overcome the probelms of SE. Self field electrodynamics (SFE) utilizes the chaotic nature of electromagnetic emissions, as charges lose energy near atomic dimensions, to try to understand and mimic quantum phenomena. These fields and charges can “interact with themselves” in a non-linear fashion, and may thereby explain many quantum phenomena from a semi-classical viewpoint. Referred to as self fields, they have gone by other names in the literature: “evanesccent radiation”, “virtual photons”, and “vacuum fluctuations”. Using self fields, we discuss the uncertainty principles, the Casimir effects, and the black-body radiation spectrum, diffraction and interference effects, Schrodinger's equation, Planck's constant, and the nature of the electron and how they might be understood in the present framework. No new theory could ever replace QED. The self field view (if correct) would, at best, only serve to provide some understanding of the processes by which strange quantum phenomena occur at the atomic level. We discuss possible areas where experiments might be employed to test SFE, and areas where future work may lie.
The uncertainty principle (linked to p,x or E,t) plays an important role in quantum mechanics. For example, an electron with an exact momentum p is described by a wavefunction exp(ipx). This function exists at all x points and so it is suggested in the literature that there is complete uncertainty as to the electron’s position. (More specifically P(x)=exp(-ipx)exp(ipx) normalization constant=constant and so all x points have the same probability.) Thus if p is completely certain, it is said that position x is completely unknown. We note, however, that exp(ipx) consists of cos(px) and sin(px) which are repeated probability distributions (with zero endpoints). Thus even though they exist in all of space, due to repetition which in turn is due to spatial invariance, there is a specific length number, namely the wavelength. Thus we argue that in classical physics there is a set of points (x,p), but in quantum mechanics ( p , x with its dx interval), with the latter being equal to hbar/p. Then the only uncertainty is within the dx interval i.e. the wavelength and spatial density is linked to momentum i.e. there is dynamical probability. In particular, there is a frequency hbar/E and a wavelength hbar/p which define an internal clock and ruler and the two are independent. Thus within a wavelength one has a probabilistic picture (in order to have endpoints defining the dx interval) and no sense of time, yet on average time exists because of hbar/E and the particle moves in space with a constant v. This begs the question: How do time and space x arise in such a scenario? We speculate the following. Assume there exists a property called energy which defines an object. This object, however, may break into two different objects. As a result, one introduces a parameter called time to distinguish between the two systems (E) and (E1,E2). For a certain time range one has a single object, while for a later time interval, one has two objects. Each of the two objects in the second system, however, needs to be distinguished as well and so another parameter, namely space x is used for this. If the two objects existed at the same x and t, how would one know there were two unless another parameter were introduced? We use t and x as the distinguishing parameters and furthermore give these a measure i.e. dt and dx. We then argue that from these ideas one may show the notion of speed and direction (because there are two objects) as well as conservation of momentum arises. Given the notion of an interval, we argue it must be described by a probability distribution and we link this to constant/p and exp(ipx). We finally note that since spatial density is linked to dynamical probability, one must consider motion associated with a density which may lead even to collective motion.
In quantum mechanics, the probabilistic interpretation, the complementarity principle (wave-particle duality), and the uncertainty principle form the foundation of the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation. However, this interpretation occasionally produces results that conflict with physical reasoning and intuition, leading to a long-standing debate that has persisted for nearly a century. Based on the conditions of action quantization and determinacy relations, this study reveals that the trajectory of an elementary particle forms a virtual line. At discrete points along this line, the particle exhibits particle-like properties, whereas in the regions between these points, the particle's existence cannot be detected. The most fundamental form of matter is the matter field. Its motion is wave-like and is described by a continuous wave equation and wave function over the entire spacetime domain. At specific spacetime points defined by xn =nh px and tn = nh E⁄ for n=1,2,3,…, the quantized matter field gives rise to the excitation and annihilation of elementary particles, indicating their discontinuous nature. This creation–annihilation process constitutes the wave motion of the matter field. The time and spatial scales associated with this process correspond to one period and one wavelength of the matter field wave, respectively. The Schrödinger equation, in this context, is understood as the non-relativistic equation of motion for a low-speed matter field. The eigenfunction of an elementary particle is, in essence, a wave function that describes the dynamic behavior of the matter field, encompassing the processes of its motion, as well as the generation and annihilation of the particle.
Abstract Virtual particles are expected to occur in microscopic processes, as they are introduced, for instance, by Feynman in quantum electrodynamics as photons performing in an unknown way in the interaction between two electrons. This note describes macroscopic virtual particles as they appear in classical evanescent modes and in quantum mechanical tunnelling particles. Remarkably, these large virtual particles are present in wave mechanics of elastic, electromagnetic, and Schrödinger fields.