Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

II. The topological structure of the space of states

Published Oct 29, 2007• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-51916-5_3

Related papers

The topological structure of the space of states

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•0 citations

Physics of Difference II: Comparison Structure and the Emergence of Topology

Yasuaki Tamura

AbstractWe investigate the minimal structural conditions under which relational accessibility organization admits a topological representation within physical description. Starting solely from the existence of distinguishable states and admissible comparison relations, we analyze how accessibility structures arise without introducing prior notions of space, geometry, metric structure, probability, or dynamics.Within the present framework, comparison between states is interpreted as a structural relation governing the accessibility of distinctions. The consistency requirements imposed on admissible comparisons induce preorder-like relational organization on the state space. We show that such comparison-induced accessibility structures admit neighborhood-like representations and may be organized in a form compatible with topological description.Importantly, the present framework does not interpret topology as a primitive geometric entity. Rather, topological structure is treated as a mathematical representation of relational accessibility induced by admissible comparison structure. In this perspective, neighborhood relations characterize accessibility coherence among distinguishable states rather than spatial proximity in a preexisting geometric manifold.We further show that equivalence structures associated with comparison naturally introduce classes of states that are indistinguishable within a given accessibility framework while remaining structurally distinct in the underlying state space. This provides a relational interpretation of local accessibility organization without invoking observer-dependent notions or externally imposed representational scales.The present work does not introduce new mathematical constructions. Instead, it identifies structural conditions under which topological representation becomes compatible with a minimal relational framework of physical description.

•May 11, 2026•0 citations

The algebraic structure of the space of states

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•0 citations

Dynamic Topology Quantum State Space Structure (DTSSS)

Jincheng Zhang

This paper presents a novel approach to quantum state space representation based on dynamic topology. We introduce a new framework, Dynamic Topology Quantum State Space Structure (DTSSS), which leverages topological properties to model quantum state evolution. This model offers a fundamentally different perspective on quantum mechanics, enabling a deeper understanding of quantum states through their dynamic transformations. The core of DTSSS involves employing topological tools to optimize the structure of quantum states during evolution, thereby facilitating more accurate predictions of quantum state trajectories. This work addresses the limitations of traditional approaches by embracing the inherent dynamism of quantum systems. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DTSSS through a series of illustrative examples, showcasing its potential for advanced quantum simulation and analysis.

•Sep 7, 2026•0 citations

I. The algebraic structure of the space of states

Springer eBooks•Oct 29, 2007•0 citations

Quantization from First Principles: The Structural Origin of ℏ and Spin from Phase Topology

Maksym Altunin

Planck’s constant h has long been introduced axiomatically in quantum mechanics, with its numerical value fixed empirically. Yet its structural necessity and intrinsic relation to the topology of phase space remain unresolved. In this work we develop a phase-ontological framework — the Omega-model — in which monodromy provides the fundamental mechanism of quantization. The structural chain is established as: Topology → Monodromy → Quantization Rules → h as universal coherence threshold.Within this perspective, h is not derived as a numerical constant but identified as a universal unit of minimal coherent action that calibrates the model’s internal parameters. This formulation yields a unified topological explanation for (i) the inevitability of quantized action and (ii) the dichotomy of bosonic versus fermionic statistics, interpreted as trivial and nontrivial monodromy, respectively. Consistency of the coherence criterion with foundational quantum experiments and even recent high-energy anomalies demonstrates that the Omega-model offers a coherent bridge between topology, phase coherence, and the structural foundations of quantum theory.

•Aug 20, 2025•0 citations
AbstractWe investigate the minimal structural conditions under which relational accessibility organization admits a topological representation within physical description. Starting solely from the existence of distinguishable states and admissible comparison relations, we analyze how accessibility structures arise without introducing prior notions of space, geometry, metric structure, probability, or dynamics.Within the present framework, comparison between states is interpreted as a structural relation governing the accessibility of distinctions. The consistency requirements imposed on admissible comparisons induce preorder-like relational organization on the state space. We show that such comparison-induced accessibility structures admit neighborhood-like representations and may be organized in a form compatible with topological description.Importantly, the present framework does not interpret topology as a primitive geometric entity. Rather, topological structure is treated as a mathematical representation of relational accessibility induced by admissible comparison structure. In this perspective, neighborhood relations characterize accessibility coherence among distinguishable states rather than spatial proximity in a preexisting geometric manifold.We further show that equivalence structures associated with comparison naturally introduce classes of states that are indistinguishable within a given accessibility framework while remaining structurally distinct in the underlying state space. This provides a relational interpretation of local accessibility organization without invoking observer-dependent notions or externally imposed representational scales.The present work does not introduce new mathematical constructions. Instead, it identifies structural conditions under which topological representation becomes compatible with a minimal relational framework of physical description.
This paper presents a novel approach to quantum state space representation based on dynamic topology. We introduce a new framework, Dynamic Topology Quantum State Space Structure (DTSSS), which leverages topological properties to model quantum state evolution. This model offers a fundamentally different perspective on quantum mechanics, enabling a deeper understanding of quantum states through their dynamic transformations. The core of DTSSS involves employing topological tools to optimize the structure of quantum states during evolution, thereby facilitating more accurate predictions of quantum state trajectories. This work addresses the limitations of traditional approaches by embracing the inherent dynamism of quantum systems. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DTSSS through a series of illustrative examples, showcasing its potential for advanced quantum simulation and analysis.
Planck’s constant h has long been introduced axiomatically in quantum mechanics, with its numerical value fixed empirically. Yet its structural necessity and intrinsic relation to the topology of phase space remain unresolved. In this work we develop a phase-ontological framework — the Omega-model — in which monodromy provides the fundamental mechanism of quantization. The structural chain is established as: Topology → Monodromy → Quantization Rules → h as universal coherence threshold.Within this perspective, h is not derived as a numerical constant but identified as a universal unit of minimal coherent action that calibrates the model’s internal parameters. This formulation yields a unified topological explanation for (i) the inevitability of quantized action and (ii) the dichotomy of bosonic versus fermionic statistics, interpreted as trivial and nontrivial monodromy, respectively. Consistency of the coherence criterion with foundational quantum experiments and even recent high-energy anomalies demonstrates that the Omega-model offers a coherent bridge between topology, phase coherence, and the structural foundations of quantum theory.