Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Classical Reinforcement Learning for Experimental Quantum Error Correction

Volodymyr Sivak, Henry X. Liu, Alec Eickbusch, Baptiste Royer, Ioannis Tsioutsios, Michel Devoret

Published Mar 17, 2021• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The recoverable quantum information: A smart reward for reinforcement learning of quantum error correction

Thomas Fösel, Petru Tighineanu, Talitha Weiß +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2019•0 citations

Compound Error Modeling and Synthesis in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Quantum Error Correction

Ming Liu, Hiroshi Tanaka, Jian Wang

•Jul 23, 2026•0 citations

Adaptive Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Quantum Error Correction in Surface Codes

Sami Rashid Mohammed Shibah

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Teacher Distillation Limits in Reinforcement Learning for Scalable Quantum Error Correction

Carlos Garcia, Hiroshi Tanaka, Luis Rodriguez

•Jul 23, 2026•0 citations

Reinforcement Learning Control of Quantum Error Correction

Volodymyr Sivak, Alexis Morvan, Michael Broughton +296 more

Quantum error correction (QEC) is the primary strategy for protecting a quantum computer from the environment. Its prerequisite is that errors must remain sufficiently rare, which requires perpetually adapting the computer's control parameters to the drifting environment conditions. The current solution to this problem is to terminate the entire quantum computation for recalibration, but it is incompatible with the long runtimes of future quantum algorithms. We address this challenge by unifying calibration with computation. We grant the QEC process a dual role: its error detection events are not only used to correct the logical quantum state, but are also repurposed as a learning signal, teaching a reinforcement learning (RL) agent to continuously steer the control parameters and stabilize the quantum system during computation. We experimentally demonstrate this framework on a Willow superconducting processor, improving the logical stability of the surface code 3.5-fold against injected drift. By synthesizing our full suite of technological advances, we achieve record performance of the surface and color codes, with average logical error per cycle of $7.72(9)\times10^{-4}$ and $8.19(14)\times10^{-3}$ respectively. Numerical simulations of large codes with tens of thousands of control parameters confirm the scalability of our RL framework, revealing an optimization speed that is independent of system size. This work thus enables a new paradigm: a quantum computer that learns from its errors and never stops computing.

quant-pharXiv:2511.08493•Nature•Nov 12, 2025•5 citations

Post-error Correction for Quantum Annealing Processor Using Reinforcement Learning

Tomasz Śmierzchalski, Łukasz Pawela, Zbigniew Puchała +2 more

arXiv:2203.02030•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2022•3 citations
Quantum error correction (QEC) is the primary strategy for protecting a quantum computer from the environment. Its prerequisite is that errors must remain sufficiently rare, which requires perpetually adapting the computer's control parameters to the drifting environment conditions. The current solution to this problem is to terminate the entire quantum computation for recalibration, but it is incompatible with the long runtimes of future quantum algorithms. We address this challenge by unifying calibration with computation. We grant the QEC process a dual role: its error detection events are not only used to correct the logical quantum state, but are also repurposed as a learning signal, teaching a reinforcement learning (RL) agent to continuously steer the control parameters and stabilize the quantum system during computation. We experimentally demonstrate this framework on a Willow superconducting processor, improving the logical stability of the surface code 3.5-fold against injected drift. By synthesizing our full suite of technological advances, we achieve record performance of the surface and color codes, with average logical error per cycle of 7.72(9)×10−47.72(9)\times10^{-4}7.72(9)×10−4 and 8.19(14)×10−38.19(14)\times10^{-3}8.19(14)×10−3 respectively. Numerical simulations of large codes with tens of thousands of control parameters confirm the scalability of our RL framework, revealing an optimization speed that is independent of system size. This work thus enables a new paradigm: a quantum computer that learns from its errors and never stops computing.