Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Geometry of mixed states and degeneracy structure of geometric phases for multi-level quantum systems. A unitary group approach

Elisa Ercolessi, Giuseppe Marmo, G. Mor, Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

Published May 3, 2001• 22 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We analyze the geometric aspects of unitary evolution of general states for a multilevel quantum system by exploiting the structure of coadjoint orbits in the unitary group Lie algebra. Using the same method in the case of SU(3) we study the effect of degeneracies on geometric phases for three-level systems. This is shown to lead to a highly nontrivial generalization of the result for two-level systems in which degeneracy results in a "monopole" structure in parameter space. The rich structures that arise are related to the geometry of adjoint orbits in SU(3). The limiting case of a two-level degeneracy in a three-level system is shown to lead to the known monopole structure.

Related papers

GEOMETRY OF MIXED STATES AND DEGENERACY STRUCTURE OF GEOMETRIC PHASES FOR MULTI-LEVEL QUANTUM SYSTEMS: A UNITARY GROUP APPROACH

E. ERCOLESSI, G. MARMO, G. MORANDI +1 more

We analyze the geometric aspects of unitary evolution of general states for a multilevel quantum system by exploiting the structure of coadjoint orbits in the unitary group Lie algebra. Using the same methods in the case of SU(3) we study the effect of degeneracies on geometric phases for three-level systems. This is shown to lead to a highly nontrivial generalization of the result for two-level systems in which degeneracy results in a "monopole" structure in parameter space. The rich structures that arise are related to the geometry of adjoint orbits in SU(3). The limiting case of a two-level degeneracy in a three-level system is shown to lead to the known monopole structure.

arXiv:quant-ph/0105007•International Journal of Modern Physics A•Dec 20, 2001•25 citations

Comprehensive Analysis of Geometric Phase for SU(3) Representations

Abhirup Chatterjee, Sobhan Kumar Sounda

Geometric Phase in Quantum Mechanics is generally formulated entirely in terms of geometric structure of the Complex Hilbert Space. We will exploit this fact in case of mixed states for three level open systems undergoing depolarization using the eight dimensional Poincare sphere in the SU(2) Polarisation picture and non unit vector rays in H3 within the limit of pure state approach may be found to be in agreement with the Pancharatnam Phase, Berry Phase and Aharonov-Anandan Phase.

quant-pharXiv:2511.08323•Nov 12, 2025•0 citations

A generalized Pancharatnam geometric phase formula for three-level quantum systems

Arvind, K. S. Mallesh, Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

We describe a recently developed generalization of the Poincaré sphere method, to represent pure states of a three-level quantum system in a convenient geometrical manner. The construction depends on the properties of the group SU(3) and its generators in the defining representation, and uses geometrical objects and operations in an eight-dimensional real Euclidean space. This construction is then used to develop a generalization of the well known Pancharatnam geometric phase formula, for evolution of a three-level system along a geodesic triangle in state space.

arXiv:quant-ph/9605042•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 7, 1997•103 citations

Analysis of Gauge Invariant Geometric Phase for Optical Systems Undergoing Depolarization Modeled by SU(3) Polarization Scheme

A. Chatterjee

Geometric Phase in Quantum Mechanics is generally formulated entirely in terms of geometric structure of the Complex Hilbert Space. We will exploit this fact in case of mixed states for three level open systems undergoing depolarization using the eight di- mensional Poincare sphere and non unit vector rays in H3 within the limit of pure state approach may be found to be in agreement with the Pancharatnam Phase, Berry Phase and Aharonov-Anandan Phase. We will consider the Depolarization of the Three di- mensional fields by introducing the stokes parameters and by redefining the definition of Degree of Polarization using the SU(3) algebra to describe the quantum light depolariza- tion of Non-paraxial beams by minimal reservoir coupling models modeled by Lindblad Master equations and connect the solution of that with the geometric phase for systems undergoing depolarization.

•Nov 17, 2025•0 citations

Group theoretical aspects of the geometric phase in quantum mechanics.

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

The geometric phase in quantum mechanics was originally elucidated in the context of the adiabatic theorem. This and other limitations were later removed. We show how this phase can be presented as the simplest functional of smooth open curves of unit vectors in Hilbert space, invariant under the two groups of local phase changes and monotonic reparametrisations. This viewpoint clarifies the role of the early Pancharatnam criterion for two Hilbert space vectors to be `in phase', in the later geometric phase context. Noncyclic evolution is handled in a very direct manner. Connections to the Bargmann invariants of quantum mechanics are immediate and can be exploited. A class of geometric phases arises in connection with unitary representations of Lie groups. In this case a surprisingly complete analysis of the structure of the geometric phase is possible, motivated by the Wigner-Eckart theorem. The interplay between geometric phase ideas and Lie group unitary representations is extraordinarily rich; the differential geometric structures of Lie groups and coset spaces play very important roles and allow classification of all possible geometric phases associated with a given Lie group. Examples involving SU(2), SU(3) and the metaplectic group Mp(2) are presented.

•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Geometry of mixed states for a q-bit and Fisher information

Elisa Ercolessi, Michele Schiavina

After a review of the pure state case, we discuss from a geometrical point of view the meaning of the Quantum Fisher metric in the case of mixed states for a two-level system, i.e. for a q-bit, by examining the structure of the fiber bundle of states, which can also be identified with a co-adjoint orbit of the unitary group. We show that the full quantum Fisher tensor has a symmetric part that coincides with the metric of the manifold of SU(2), i.e. the 3-dimensional sphere $S^3$, and an anti-symmetric part that is intrinsically related to the KKS-symplectic form that is naturally defined on co-adjoint orbits.

•May 11, 2012•0 citations
We analyze the geometric aspects of unitary evolution of general states for a multilevel quantum system by exploiting the structure of coadjoint orbits in the unitary group Lie algebra. Using the same method in the case of SU(3) we study the effect of degeneracies on geometric phases for three-level systems. This is shown to lead to a highly nontrivial generalization of the result for two-level systems in which degeneracy results in a "monopole" structure in parameter space. The rich structures that arise are related to the geometry of adjoint orbits in SU(3). The limiting case of a two-level degeneracy in a three-level system is shown to lead to the known monopole structure.
We analyze the geometric aspects of unitary evolution of general states for a multilevel quantum system by exploiting the structure of coadjoint orbits in the unitary group Lie algebra. Using the same methods in the case of SU(3) we study the effect of degeneracies on geometric phases for three-level systems. This is shown to lead to a highly nontrivial generalization of the result for two-level systems in which degeneracy results in a "monopole" structure in parameter space. The rich structures that arise are related to the geometry of adjoint orbits in SU(3). The limiting case of a two-level degeneracy in a three-level system is shown to lead to the known monopole structure.
We describe a recently developed generalization of the Poincaré sphere method, to represent pure states of a three-level quantum system in a convenient geometrical manner. The construction depends on the properties of the group SU(3) and its generators in the defining representation, and uses geometrical objects and operations in an eight-dimensional real Euclidean space. This construction is then used to develop a generalization of the well known Pancharatnam geometric phase formula, for evolution of a three-level system along a geodesic triangle in state space.
Geometric Phase in Quantum Mechanics is generally formulated entirely in terms of geometric structure of the Complex Hilbert Space. We will exploit this fact in case of mixed states for three level open systems undergoing depolarization using the eight di- mensional Poincare sphere and non unit vector rays in H3 within the limit of pure state approach may be found to be in agreement with the Pancharatnam Phase, Berry Phase and Aharonov-Anandan Phase. We will consider the Depolarization of the Three di- mensional fields by introducing the stokes parameters and by redefining the definition of Degree of Polarization using the SU(3) algebra to describe the quantum light depolariza- tion of Non-paraxial beams by minimal reservoir coupling models modeled by Lindblad Master equations and connect the solution of that with the geometric phase for systems undergoing depolarization.
The geometric phase in quantum mechanics was originally elucidated in the context of the adiabatic theorem. This and other limitations were later removed. We show how this phase can be presented as the simplest functional of smooth open curves of unit vectors in Hilbert space, invariant under the two groups of local phase changes and monotonic reparametrisations. This viewpoint clarifies the role of the early Pancharatnam criterion for two Hilbert space vectors to be `in phase', in the later geometric phase context. Noncyclic evolution is handled in a very direct manner. Connections to the Bargmann invariants of quantum mechanics are immediate and can be exploited. A class of geometric phases arises in connection with unitary representations of Lie groups. In this case a surprisingly complete analysis of the structure of the geometric phase is possible, motivated by the Wigner-Eckart theorem. The interplay between geometric phase ideas and Lie group unitary representations is extraordinarily rich; the differential geometric structures of Lie groups and coset spaces play very important roles and allow classification of all possible geometric phases associated with a given Lie group. Examples involving SU(2), SU(3) and the metaplectic group Mp(2) are presented.
After a review of the pure state case, we discuss from a geometrical point of view the meaning of the Quantum Fisher metric in the case of mixed states for a two-level system, i.e. for a q-bit, by examining the structure of the fiber bundle of states, which can also be identified with a co-adjoint orbit of the unitary group. We show that the full quantum Fisher tensor has a symmetric part that coincides with the metric of the manifold of SU(2), i.e. the 3-dimensional sphere S3S^3S3, and an anti-symmetric part that is intrinsically related to the KKS-symplectic form that is naturally defined on co-adjoint orbits.