Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki

About two interpretations of the Uncertainty relations for the Energy and Time

Nikolai Sergeevich krylov, V. Fock

Published Dec 1, 1947• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Half-Life and the Uncertainty Principle

E. N. Petrova, Sergey Anatol'evich Pirogov

An attempt is made to give an accurate mathematical interpretation of the energy–time uncertainty relation.

Problems of Information Transmission•Dec 1, 2023•0 citations

Time-energy uncertainty relation for quantum events

Matteo Fadel, Lorenzo Maccone

Textbook quantum mechanics treats time as a classical parameter and not as a quantum observable with an associated Hermitian operator. For this reason, to make sense of usual time-energy uncertainty relations such as $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}t\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}E\ensuremath{\gtrsim}\ensuremath{\hbar}$, the term $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}t$ must be interpreted as a time interval and not as a time measurement uncertainty due to quantum noise. However, quantum clocks allow for a measurement of the ``time at which an event happens'' by conditioning the system's evolution on an additional quantum degree of freedom. Within this framework we derive here two uncertainty relations that relate the uncertainty in the quantum measurement of the time at which a quantum event happens on a system to its energy uncertainty.

arXiv:2108.13974•Physical Review A•Nov 24, 2021•10 citations

On the Uncertainty Relation between Time and Energy

CRC Press eBooks•May 21, 2004•7 citations

Energy–time uncertainty relations and time operators

Al. Ivanov

Journal of Mathematical Chemistry•Sep 22, 2006•6 citations

1 On the Uncertainty Relation between Time and Energy

L.D. Faddeev, L.A. Khalfin, I.V. Komarov

The physical meaning of the uncertainty relation between time and energy appears to be not completely clear until now. This fact is not surprising since the interpretation of the time-energy relation is much more difficult than the interpretation of the similar relation between the coordinate and momentum. Indeed, the latter relation is easily derived from the quantum-mechanical formalism and does not require the examination of the course of the physical process in time. The relation between time and energy, however, essentially requires such an examination, and there arises a question whether Schro¨dinger’s equation may be used or not in deriving this relation, the latter possibility being not excluded since the relation may be interpreted to correspond to a measurement act, which does not obey Schro¨dinger’s equation.

CRC Press eBooks•May 21, 2004•4 citations

Time-Energy Uncertainty Principle in Bilocal Geometry and the Dual Minkowski Structure in $\mathbb{R}^{3,3}$

Tymiński, Andrzej

In the bilocal space $\mathbb{R}^{3,3}$, quantum time can be defined as the distance between two states of the same particle. This construction leads to the Minkowski interval$ds^2 = t^2 - r^2$and to the interpretation of $t$ as a time coordinate emerging geometrically. In the present paper we develop the dual side of this construction by introducing the gradient energy operator$\hat{E} = -i\hbar(\nabla_2 - \nabla_1).$We show that the time and gradient energy operators form a canonically conjugate pair:$[\hat{t},\hat{E}] = 2 i \hbar,$which leads to a relational uncertainty principle of the time--energy type$\Delta t \,\Delta E \gtrsim \hbar.$At the same time the intervals $(t,r)$ and $(E,p)$ form two equivalent Minkowski spacetimes arising from a single bilocal geometry. This formalism reveals a hidden geometric structure of quantum theory, in which time, energy and mass appear as emergent quantities resulting from relations between states.

•Dec 2, 2025•0 citations
Textbook quantum mechanics treats time as a classical parameter and not as a quantum observable with an associated Hermitian operator. For this reason, to make sense of usual time-energy uncertainty relations such as $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}t\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}E\ensuremath{\gtrsim}\ensuremath{\hbar}$, the term $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}t$ must be interpreted as a time interval and not as a time measurement uncertainty due to quantum noise. However, quantum clocks allow for a measurement of the ``time at which an event happens'' by conditioning the system's evolution on an additional quantum degree of freedom. Within this framework we derive here two uncertainty relations that relate the uncertainty in the quantum measurement of the time at which a quantum event happens on a system to its energy uncertainty.
The physical meaning of the uncertainty relation between time and energy appears to be not completely clear until now. This fact is not surprising since the interpretation of the time-energy relation is much more difficult than the interpretation of the similar relation between the coordinate and momentum. Indeed, the latter relation is easily derived from the quantum-mechanical formalism and does not require the examination of the course of the physical process in time. The relation between time and energy, however, essentially requires such an examination, and there arises a question whether Schro¨dinger’s equation may be used or not in deriving this relation, the latter possibility being not excluded since the relation may be interpreted to correspond to a measurement act, which does not obey Schro¨dinger’s equation.
Time-Energy Uncertainty Principle in Bilocal Geometry and the Dual Minkowski Structure in R3,3\mathbb{R}^{3,3}R3,3
In the bilocal space R3,3\mathbb{R}^{3,3}R3,3, quantum time can be defined as the distance between two states of the same particle. This construction leads to the Minkowski intervalds2=t2−r2ds^2 = t^2 - r^2ds2=t2−r2and to the interpretation of ttt as a time coordinate emerging geometrically. In the present paper we develop the dual side of this construction by introducing the gradient energy operatorE^=−iℏ(∇2−∇1).\hat{E} = -i\hbar(\nabla_2 - \nabla_1).E^=−iℏ(∇2​−∇1​).We show that the time and gradient energy operators form a canonically conjugate pair:[t^,E^]=2iℏ,[\hat{t},\hat{E}] = 2 i \hbar,[t^,E^]=2iℏ,which leads to a relational uncertainty principle of the time--energy typeΔt ΔE≳ℏ.\Delta t \,\Delta E \gtrsim \hbar.ΔtΔE≳ℏ.At the same time the intervals (t,r)(t,r)(t,r) and (E,p)(E,p)(E,p) form two equivalent Minkowski spacetimes arising from a single bilocal geometry. This formalism reveals a hidden geometric structure of quantum theory, in which time, energy and mass appear as emergent quantities resulting from relations between states.