Schrödinger’s approach to the equations of quantum theory is not unique. Heisenberg worked out an alternative formulation. We already know how to calculate expectation values in principle, even if we don’t have the mathematical skill to do it in practice. If a system is changing and developing over time, then it makes sense to suppose that the expectation values of its physical variables will also change over time. en, the expression ∇t〈O〉 will tell us the rate at which this change is happening (look back at the de nition of ∇t in Chapter 12).
Schrödinger’s approach to the equations of quantum theory is not unique. Heisenberg worked out an alternative formulation. We already know how to calculate expectation values in principle, even if we don’t have the mathematical skill to do it in practice. If a system is changing and developing over time, then it makes sense to suppose that the expectation values of its physical variables will also change over time. en, the expression ∇t〈O〉 will tell us the rate at which this change is happening (look back at the de nition of ∇t in Chapter 12).
In classical physics, if you want to calculate what’s going to happen in a given situation, you basically have two options open to you. You can carefully specify the positions and momenta of all the particles involved, list the forces acting, and then plug the lot into Newton’s laws of motion and calculate away. Alternatively, you can inspect all the kinetic energies, potential energies, and any other form of energy involved and work through a calculation based on energy conservation. As it happens, the second approach, using energy, is the more amenable to a straightforward quantum development. The first Ehrenfest relationship should be compared with the classical formulation px=mdxdt. Moving on from Ehrenfest’s theorem, let us revisit Heisenberg’s equation of motion and explore one of its significant consequences. The left-hand side of this relationship is the time rate of change of the expectation value of the operator. Let’s think carefully about what that means.
Abstract The second chapter introduces the notion of wave functions and their equation of motion proposed by Erwin Schrödinger. The interpretation and normalization of the wave function are discussed, leading to the continuity equation. The chapter also introduces basic mathematical operations that can be carried out for wave functions and operators, describing e.g., how to calculate scalar products and commutators, as well as expectation values and variances of observables. With these tools at hand, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is re-examined, focusing on the example of a Gaussian wave packet, which is studied both in position space and momentum space. We also discuss the time evolution of general states and of the exemplary wave packet. Finally, we will see how classical physics is recovered as a limiting case of the quantum-mechanical description
The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.
In the first two chapters we have examined the basic principles – superposition (p. 18), complementarity (p. 19), quantization (p. 44), statistical algorithm (p. 57), and correspondence (p. 72) (see also Subsec. 2.3.4) – and the basic entities, observables and states, of quantum mechanics, as well as the main differences with respect to classical mechanics. While what we have discussed so far is rather a static picture of observables and states, in this chapter we shall deal with quantum dynamics, i.e. with the time evolution of quantum-mechanical systems. Historically, after Bohr had provided a quantized description of the atom (see Subsec. 1.5.4), Einstein showed the quantized nature of photons (see Subsec. 1.2.1), and de Broglie hypothized the wave-like nature of matter (see Subsec. 1.5.5), the first building block of quantum mechanics was provided by the commutation relations, proposed by Heisenberg in 1925, whose consequence is represented by the uncertainty relation (see Subsec. 2.2.7 and Sec. 2.3). This was the subject of the previous chapters. The dynamical part of the theory was proposed by Schrödinger in 1926, and is known as the Schrödinger equation. It is also known as wave mechanics (see Subsec. 1.5.7). In this chapter we shall show that Heisenberg's and Schrödinger's formulations are only two different aspects of the same theory. We shall also come back to this point in Sec. 8.1.1. Here, first we shall derive the fundamental equation which rules quantum dynamics (Sec. 3.1), and, in Sec. 3.2, we shall summarize the main properties of the Schrödinger equation.
I consider in this book a formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Usually QM is formulated based on the notion of time and space, both of which are thought a priori given quantities or notions. However, when we try to define the notion of velocity or momentum, we encounter a difficulty as we will see in chapter 1. The problem is that if the notion of time is given a priori, the velocity is definitely determined when given a position, which contradicts the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg. We then set the basis of QM on the notion of position and momentum operators as in chapter 2. Time of a local system then is defined approximately as a ratio ∣x∣/∣v∣ between the space coordinate x and the velocity v. In this formulation of QM, we can keep the uncertainty principle, and time is a quantity that does not have precise values unlike the usually supposed notion of time has. The feature of local time is that it is a time proper to each local system, which is defined as a finite set of quantum mechanical particles. We now have an infinite number of local times that are unique and proper to each local system. Based on the notion of local time, the motion inside a local system is described by the usual Schrodinger equation. We investigate such motion in a given local system in part II. This is a usual quantum mechanics. After some excursion of the investigation of local motion, we consider in part III the relative relation or motion between plural local systems. In the final part IV, we will prove that there is at least one Universe wave function ϕ in which all local systems have local motions and thus local times. This concludes our formulation of Quantum Mechanics.
I consider in this book a formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Usually QM is formulated based on the notion of time and space, both of which are thought a priori given quantities or notions. However, when we try to define the notion of velocity or momentum, we encounter a difficulty as we will see in chapter 1. The problem is that if the notion of time is given a priori, the velocity is definitely determined when given a position, which contradicts the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg. We then set the basis of QM on the notion of position and momentum operators as in chapter 2. Time of a local system then is defined approximately as a ratio ∣x∣/∣v∣ between the space coordinate x and the velocity v. In this formulation of QM, we can keep the uncertainty principle, and time is a quantity that does not have precise values unlike the usually supposed notion of time has. The feature of local time is that it is a time proper to each local system, which is defined as a finite set of quantum mechanical particles. We now have an infinite number of local times that are unique and proper to each local system. Based on the notion of local time, the motion inside a local system is described by the usual Schrödinger equation. We investigate such motion in a given local system in part II. This is a usual quantum mechanics. After some excursion of the investigation of local motion, we consider in part III the relative relation or motion between plural local systems. In the final part IV, we will prove that there is at least one Universe wave function ϕ in which all local systems have local motions and thus local times. This concludes our formulation of Quantum Mechanics.