Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

TOWARDS A RESOLUTION OF THE PARADOXES OF QUANTUM THEORY

Iii Bartley

Published Apr 15, 2013• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.4324/9780203713990-13

Related papers

SOME OBSERVATIONS ON QUANTUM THEORY

Karl Popper

•Nov 4, 2005•1 citation

QUANTUM THEORY IN THE LIGHT OF MODERN EXPERIMENTS

Charles Paul Enz

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2009•4 citations

THE SLOW RISE OF QUANTUM THEORY

Princeton University Press eBooks•Jun 16, 2020•0 citations

The Paradoxes of Quantum Mechanics

Luigi E. Picasso

UNITEXT for physics•Oct 26, 2015•0 citations

QUANTUM THEORY WITHOUT LOGICAL PARADOXES

V. Lokaj, Na Slovance

In the contribution published in AIP Conference Proceedings, No. 1018 (p. 40-5) some discrepancies in Copenhagen quantum mechanics have been summarized and arguments have been gathered why in the description of microscopic reality hidden-variable theory should be preferred. It has been shown, too, that the earlier gap in physical descriptions of microscopic and macroscopic worlds has been practically removed. All corresponding statements have been based on proofs that had been published earlier and reproduced in the given contribution only partially. In the present paper the whole approach will be explained more systematically. Some important points newly analyzed will be added.

•May 1, 2009•2 citations

On quantum theory

Berthold‐Georg Englert

arXiv:1308.5290•The European Physical Journal D•Nov 1, 2013•56 citations
In the contribution published in AIP Conference Proceedings, No. 1018 (p. 40-5) some discrepancies in Copenhagen quantum mechanics have been summarized and arguments have been gathered why in the description of microscopic reality hidden-variable theory should be preferred. It has been shown, too, that the earlier gap in physical descriptions of microscopic and macroscopic worlds has been practically removed. All corresponding statements have been based on proofs that had been published earlier and reproduced in the given contribution only partially. In the present paper the whole approach will be explained more systematically. Some important points newly analyzed will be added.